657 karma · joined March 9, 2011
[1]: https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1i8rujw/notes_o...
The AI gets "rewards" (like points) for doing two things correctly:
Accuracy : Getting the right answer. For example, math answers must be in a specific format (e.g., inside a box) so a computer can easily check them. For coding problems, test cases verify if the code works.
Format : Using the <think> and <answer> tags properly. This forces the AI to organize its responses clearly.
So in this case, the training program can extract the model's answer by parsing <answer> tag. We can eval the answer and evaluate if it's correct or not. If it's correct give reward, else: no reward.
Create N such answers from a single question, create N reward array. This is enough for the RL algorithm to guide the model to be more smart.
Anything bigger, many people seem to like ClearPath servos. Price to performance seem to be pretty good.
One QUIC connection is equivalent to two TCP connections in that regard. So QUIC will only backoff half amount compared to TCP. In the design docs, they mention it's okay since one QUIC connection is equivalent to multiple TCP connections that a browser makes.
[1]: https://www.computer.org/csdl/trans/tc/preprint/07110563.pdf [2]: https://github.com/couchbase/forestdb
The theme seaborn uses is actually a direct clone from ggplot2 from R
http://www.pvk.ca/Blog/2012/07/30/binary-search-is-a-patholo...
http://www.erlang.org/doc/man/gen_server.html#Module:code_ch...
For example:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1840717/achieving-code-sw...
BTW, You can even support downgrade. :)
This statement is simply not true. I live in South Korea and I always run it all night in summer.