2,352 karma · joined November 25, 2010
Email: sasha@selectnull.com
meet.hn/city/45.3267976,14.442208/Grad-Rijeka
Socials: - bsky.app/profile/https://bsky.app/profile/selectnull.com - github.com/https://github.com/selectnull
Interests: Networking, Programming, Web Development
---
Approximately at the time when majority of the Mozilla resources started going into non-browser projects. And pretty much for the same reason.
Hmmm... no. Why should I? Just let me use git.
`curl` (and similarly important projects) have a tremendous leverage with the big tech and I don't see any of them on curl's sponsors page. Why not?
The sales pitch (and yes, treating the project like a business implies sales) would be simple: we are curl, you depend on us, pay us 1M/anually and with that money we'll hire the experts that we need to continue the development and support of the project. Raise a few millions (recurring) and secure the project's financial stability. Pay yourself a respectable salary, hire people. If "the big tech" refuses, publicly call them out on it. Connect with other prominent projects and act together. The internet depends on you, you should be awarded.
I have a tremendous respect for curl as a project and Daniel as a person (based on his writtings, never met him) and I know it's easy to comment out the stuff on the internet from a safe distance, but I still wonder if things could be actually different.
So, Anthropic acquires Bun team because claude-code uses Bun. They port Bun from Zig to Rust presumably because Rust "is better" (imagine big air quotes here). Again presumably, they want to make claude-code "better". Why make it so complicated? With all the power of LLMs they have, surely they can make claude-code the best possible by writting it in Rust directly.
I own a cute domain for that: repositoryum.com. I had the plans for it, but it's one of those that never came to a realization.
Honestly, that's such a low bar to hit.
Nevertheless, very cool. Love those keyboards, planning to replace my K1 with a new one soon.
I didn't see a single comment of "I will fork it" type.
In the email you have linked to, he does not support tivoization. He simply says that he finds the term offensive (which is really funny coming from him).
Torvalds has also publicly stated that he doesn't think that tivoization benefits users, but it's not his battle to fight. More info on that topic can be found in the linked YT (linked at the precise time he is answering the question about tivoization, but the whole video is about GPL v2 vs GPL v3).
YT video: https://youtu.be/PaKIZ7gJlRU?si=RK5ZHizoidgVA1xO&t=288
[init]
defaultBranch = masterEach of the 4 charts have data for Ferron and Caddy, but then include data for lighttpd, apache, nginx and traefik selectively for each chart, such that each chart has exactly four selected servers.
That doesn't inspire confidence.
Please list the prices.
Damned if you do and damned if you don't.
I don't see myself having the time to implement all the features I sometimes (half-assed) think of. It's semi useful tool, sometimes.