Totally agree on the confidence metric. The way chatbots spew complete falsities in such a confident tone is really disheartening. I want to use AI more but I don't feel I can trust it at all. If I can't trust it and have to search for other resources to verify it's claims, the value is really diminished.
I disagree that op has a "broadly accurate view". That's the entire point of my response. I didn't say they needed therapy. I suggested therapy might help them if they're looking to improve this "view".
I was responding to the first paragraph. I think it's unlikely that: "people... don't want my opinion" or "I am not allowed to wear" or "I am not allowed to discuss" (because they are from a lower class).
This seems like a pretty dark take. It may be accurate, but seems unlikely or at least incomplete. Even if it was accurate, viewing the world through such a myopic lens isn't going to help you or anybody else. A therapist might be able to help you out, if you're looking for it.
I don't think that's equivalent. If you buy a Ford car, you aren't forced to buy tires from the Ford dealership. You're not a "Ford Customer" beholden to the Ford Motor Company when it comes to everything related to the car. If you buy a Dell desktop you aren't forced to buy all software through a Dell marketplace. I'm sure if these companies could, they would, and apple can and so they do. But is that the world we want? Sure, in a totally "free" market apple should be able to do want ever they want. But are we more interested in freedom for corporations or freedom for people? Would things be better for everyone if we used the power of government to prevent these anticompetitive practices? Why can't apple offer good reason for iPhone users to buy software through their marketplace and take the 30%, all the while allowing users to choose to download software outside of the marketplace?
I would imagine that, with more experience, anticipating the (more consistent) actions of a machine would be easier than anticipating the actions of an unknown human in an unknown state.
It's articles like these that make things more confusing for folks who are learning about auth/session security. It's obvious the author has developed strong convictions without really understanding the subject.
I can't make it past the first sentence:
> ...utilize JSON Web tokens (JWTs) for session handling instead of cookies.
One has nothing to do with the other. You can use a jwt and cookies. You can use a db session and use a jwt and not use cookies. Etc etc
I thought keybase was really on to something. It's ashame they sold out. I'm surprised nothing has picked up where it left off in relation to identity declaration/proof.
Legalize possession of personal quantities of all drugs.
Highly regulate the sale and production of drugs -- limiting sale to personal possession amounts, tracking sales to prevent store hopping.
Highly regulate where drugs can be used -- not in public, on the streets.
Use tax money strictly for rehab treatment, enforcing regulation, drug research, building safe injection houses, etc.
You can't just decriminalize drugs, you have to control the production and sale. This ensures quality control and gives social workers direct access to drug users, not to mention removing the black market and the hell that comes with it.
I share the same sentiment. I don't like this "in bed with nextjs" and obsessed with server-side thing. Server rendered apps have their place, but so do spas. Let the spa haters hate. You can make great, performant apps with strictly client side rendering. For some applications, it's the best choice.
Yea, I've been using both and really like the direction of remix. Why did react become so intertwined with nextjs and obsessed with ssr? I wish react stayed focused as a light spa library we all learned and loved and let the ssr frameworks do their own thing.
I've used react daily since the early days. I like hooks but I don't really know what the _real_ problem was that they solved. Getting rid of class components?
> The transactional aspect is specifically to compensate for not doing as they please, so what are you talking about?
I'm just saying that this statement is categorically false, in that, there are people who engage in sex work at their pleasure. You're dismissal of their existence, in fact, proves your ignorance.
I disagree. Table_id is more descriptive and easier to use when joining -- no need to alias if you're selecting multiple table keys, can use USING for joins, etc
I disagree. When considering a broader timeline, we live in a time of extraordinary wealth, safety, and ease (especially in the west). It just happens that these things don't necessarily make us happy or even mentally healthy. Media channels constantly pump us with negativity-- fear, jealousy, and hatred of the other. I think most people just need a serious attitude adjustment. Life isn't easy no matter how many luxuries you have. Everything is likely doomed when considering the larger timeline. Suck it up and make your world a better place.