10 karma · joined March 6, 2026
Not only that, the less coding you do in general? Guess what, fixing issues that in the past wouldve been a doddle (muscle memory) become less harder due to atrophy.
Swear most people dont think straight and cant see the obvious.
I came to the same conclusion when producing a video with Grok. Did the job but utterly painful and it was definitely very costly - I used 50 free-trial accounts and maxed them out each day for a month.
Im pretty sure these conclusions hold across all models and therefore the technology by extension.
If you look at my post history I'm essentially saying the same stuff lol.
I test to see the way people think now. People like you would pass my interview.
I don't get why people try to simplify - you're removing important details that determine performance and therefore output. This leads to false conclusions.
Lol why? You've been suckered in and will eventually crash and burn. But carry on.
Just remember when things go wrong - it's your ass on the line.
Personally I have been able to produce a very good output with Grok in relation to a video. However, it was insanely painful and very annoying to produce. In retrospect I would've much preferred to have hired humans.
Not to mention I used about 50 free-trial Grok accounts, so who knows what the costs involved were? Tens of thousands no doubt.
But that won't generate the returns Model producers need :) This is the issue. So they will keep pushing nonsense.
Its not rocket science to measure actually. The issue is most people dont know how to think properly to invent the right proxies.
The iPod project was done in months, not years. Im convinced most people aren't as good at programming / focusing on the right stuff as they claim.
This place is full of bozos.
Apple has already shown this decades ago - they got the iPhone and iPod developed and out the door in relatively short-time scales given the impact of the products on the world. Once you know what you want, exactly what you want, things moves fast - really fast.
Guys like you dont get it. You think OAI, Amazon etc can freely put large amounts of money into this for 5-10 years? Lmao - delusional. Investors are impatient. Show huge jumps in revenue this year or you no longer have permission to put monumental amounts of money into this anymore.
Short of that they'll just destroy the stock price by selling off; leaving employees who get paid via SBC very unhappy.
Job done fella.
There's a lot of perverse interests and incentives at play.
Sunk cost fallacy is very real, for all involved. Especially the model producers and their investors.
Sunk cost fallacy is also real for dev's who are now giving up how they used to work - they've made a sunk investment in learning to use LLMs etc. Hence the 'there's no going back' comments that crop up on here.
As I said in this thread - anyone who can think straight - Im referring to those who adhere to fundamental economic principles - can see what's going on from a mile away.
No simply 'producing a feature' aint it bud. That's one piece of the puzzle.
Humans are funny. But most cant seem to understand that the tool is a mirage and they are putting false expectations on it. E.g. management of firms cutting back on hiring under the expectation that LLMs will do magic - with many cheering 'this is the worst itll be bro!!".
I just hope more people realise before Anthropic and OAI can IPO. I would wager they are in the process of cleaning up their financials for it.
People who actually know how to think can see it a mile away.
Shipping speed never/is was the issue. Most companies are terrible at figuring out what exactly they should be allocating resources behind.
Speeding up does not solve the problem that most humans who are at the top of the hierarchy are poor thinkers. In fact it compounds it. More noise, nice.
Also dont forget theres only so many viable revenue-generating and cost-saving projects to take. And said above - overhiring in COVID.