scurnus

"The United States should lead"; "This will also determine whether advanced AI strengthens the networks that the United States and its allies already have"

These points are a bit conflicting, it is not clear what resources the rest of the world will have to narrow the gap. This move is a written attempt to maintain the top place and control over the rest of the world. It doesn't make sense for other companies to help you, what are you giving to them?

This political move will probably fail, because you don't have allies trust. The legislation nightmare from all the countries you operate in will come, and you have to deal with it, if you want take money out of everyone pockets.

Workers will get many boards for sure, you are underestimating unions and protests, it just won't be accepted that there isn't any job for people. The change will be diluted, to try to make economy absorb it.

It is not possible to have for 300k+ orgs the entities circles ordered by importance for the specific organization.

The feature is you can double click on Jacques Chirac and observe its connections to orgs like "the republicans", " rally for republic" and so on. The fun is in exploring graphs. You can also click investigate for a brief bio synthesis,

7M+ people and 3M+ organizations mapped, you can visualize entities associated with an organizations up to 1k nodes, or visualize someones graph visualization(relatives, partners, phd advisors, org connected to entity. Wikidata based. There is also a feed section: https://humansmap.com/?feed=1 Better for mobile use, here you can explore family dynasties, org memberships, interesting relationships. I increased db size lately, so there is still some latency, due to entities not cached in memory and limited ram.

The way they are doing it is by trying to get the attention and staying on top of the news, it is a game they are playing that benefits both OpenAI and Anthropic. The more people discuss SF drama, the less attention Chinese Labs and others get.

Regarding product and credibility normal people have a completely different view about LLMs, most don't even know difference between models and probably don't even care about Millenium problems, but care instead if chatgpt can solve their day to day problems. This is just them trying to have the throne on the AI companies space, outside it this result won't matter.

OpenAI tried to collaborate and share the results together with a fixed timeline, to avoid this mess but it was inevitable. There is a conflict of interest, where the other researcher works at Anthropic, who will also try to take credit.

Where they may be in the wrong is if they took user data regarding the problem, how will we know if they did or not?