scudsworth

no

lol, lot of words for a No True Scotsman. clearly there are intelligent and evil people in the world, however you refuse to engage with a basic question like this

wow, a mangled vscode fork that's now also codex? the future is so bright

skill issue

wow. the new york times, writing about counter strike. i dont know if i've ever seen a more powerful no click zone

seems like marketing paffle tbh

very interesting. im going to continue using tmux instead of doing any of that.

relevant context:

"UPDATE: I thought it might be obvious from this post, but wanted to call out that I'm not a developer. Just a curious PM experimenting with Vibe Coding."

aeiou

windows vista was prep work for ar interfaces

it doesn't seem like this would supercede a court order

pleased to see a paragraph-long comment in the examples. now thats good coding.

"bosses": ah, good. i shall demoralize and imprison my employees to prevent them from doing this. this will be good for productivity

i mean it sounds like that doctor had it right then? i dont think this reads as a win for "online self-diagnosis", ai-empowered or otherwise.

>Our head of product is a reformed lawyer who taught himself to code while working here. He’s shipped 150 PRs in the last 12 months.

>The product manager he sits next to has shipped 130 PRs in the last 12 months.

this is actually horrifying, lol. i haven't even considered product guys going ham on the codebase

the sharp legal minds of hackernews

oh no! not your perception of the situation!!

- Supporting Wikipedia’s moderators and patrollers with AI-assisted workflows that automate tedious tasks in support of knowledge integrity;

so, a chatbot on top of some tooling probably

- Giving Wikipedia’s editors time back by improving the discoverability of information on Wikipedia to leave more time for human deliberation, judgment, and consensus building;

extremely vague, but probably the "train a specialized ai on our own corpus to answer questions about it" style bot helper? these make stuff up left and right too

- Helping editors share local perspectives or context by automating the translation and adaptation of common topics;

automated translations would be a big step in the wrong direction

- Scaling the onboarding of new Wikipedia volunteers with guided mentorship.

you can't do "mentorship" with ai in any real way. all in all seems a box checking exercise for their ML officer.

reinvent is in vegas

must say i wasnt impressed with the interview coder code nor its organization. skimmed another of his repos and it was basically a minimal chat app wrapping a dozen-ish prompts along the lines of "you are the user's horny anime wife. chat horny style to them. but not tooo horny."

first footnote: ok ok they're trained token by token, BUT

something tells me that this pathetic messaging approach is not going to be the one that squares the circle between "piracy is illegal" and "information wants to be free"

whats the product here exactly? 8 llm prompts? at least, according to the about page, they're using "Ethical" ai models. lol

"claude can now ddos random websites . . . more so"

lol @ "just continue generating code, so continue then, continue until you will hit closing tags, continue generating code"

whats a dry monkey

incredibly revealing statistic, lol

i love when the llm can be its work of

well, that was a waste of 3 minutes