Isn't it this case no matter who wrote the code? How do you ever run anything if you're worried about bugs?
500 karma · joined June 11, 2012
And stealth games especially will probably rely a lot on shadows and other visual things, which make rendering more expensive.
However, Windows may be in trouble with more tech-literate people who do know how to change it. I can only speak for myself, but I've been a Windows user since 95. All but one of my programming jobs over the last 20 years have also been working on Windows. But I really dislike the direction Microsoft are taking and I find Windows to be terribly slow these days, with each version seemingly worse than the previous one. So I decided to look elsewhere.
A couple of months ago I bought a new laptop with the express intention of running Linux on it and giving it a good college try (I didn't want to mess around with dual-booting and I still need Windows on my main PC for work... for now). I know very little about Linux, but I've decided I'm not going to use Windows past 10 so it's time to find something else.
I went with Debian running dwm (Debian because I value stability over everything else, and dwm because I like the suckless philosophy) and it's honestly surprised me how good it's been. It's SO snappy. Everything is instant. It's really been a breath of fresh air.
I was especially dreading programming since I've solely used Visual Studio since Visual C++ 4.0 and don't really know anything else. Anyway, I went all-in and started learning Vim, GDB, and Make, and boy do I feel like I've been missing out. I'm really enjoying programming again, which for me has just become a job over the years.
Anyway, my point is, if tech-literate people are willing to give Linux a try, I wonder how many of them would be as surprised as I was and may make the switch permanently. With Windows getting worse, and Linux getting better, maybe more than ever.
P.S. Please look up the word literally.
To take C++ as an example (I love C++ btw, this isn't another C++ bashing), a line as simple as "variable1 = variable2;", could be doing all kinds of things (including not even assigning) because of the ability to overload the asignment operator. As someone reading this line of code for the first time, you don't really know for sure what is actually happening unless you also go and read the code for "=".
Then, in each of those files the variables had similar names in order to cut down on unique identifiers. WP100, WP101, up to the max number you needed at any given time. It was a nightmare. There was as much external documentation to keep track of all of this stuff as there was code.
On top of that, you could only build programs overnight in a batch process with the rest of the system, which was run by a different team in a different country (Spain, I believe). So you would write your program in the day, phone up the guys in Spain and explain that there was a new program going in and you were responsible for it. Problem was, if your program failed to build it would hold up the whole system, which HAD to be up and running and live again by the morning. This meant that every time you made a change that went into the nightly build you also had to be on call.
I remember eagerly watching the build queue at 1AM, waiting for my file's turn. Then immediately shutting everything down and going to sleep the moment it was successful. If it wasn't successful, well, then you had to fix it on the spot and phone Spain again to tell them to give it another try. Unfortunately, you rarely knew why it was failing.
I get the impression from these people that they are constantly typing things. In fact, they're typing so much that they can't possibly waste valuable seconds using a mouse. I must be misunderstanding what they mean because that just can't be right.
And what's with the "you can achieve the same thing faster, without breaking your concentration" in regard to using a spell-checker or a calculator or whatever. Are you being serious? I can achieve the same thing faster? I mean how long do you think it takes to check the spelling of a word? Even if I must look it up in a physical dictionary, how long are we talking here?
Guys, seriously, slow down. You're going to burn out. I don't want to judge because I don't know you. Maybe you're a rockstar, but I'd guess that if you're really going this fast, the quality of your code is suffering.
Robert Oberst, another WSM competitor also says the same thing and talks about it on the Joe Rogan podcast (#1321 I believe). To quote:
"I went from football to strongman, and in football we never did deadlifts. It was all hang cleans and power cleans, which by the way, quick little tip: if you’re deadlifting to be a better deadlifter fine. If you’re not, (you’re) doing that for deadlift’s sake, don’t fucking do it. The risk to reward ratio is a joke."
"A lot of people are not going to like that I’m saying that. (…) If you go to any NFL gym, any college football gym, any athletics where people are actually getting paid and it matters what they’re doing, they’re not deadlifting. They’re hang cleaning and power cleaning."
Oh, and there is Python scripting in there somewhere too.
Ungh.
Sometimes people feel threatened. Maybe you're getting a lot of praise from the founders that you're not aware of but the team lead is. Maybe your team lead resents that you fixed X and feels his own position is in danager so he's driving you out?
You say you won't go to the founders because you can't see how they could resolve it, but you don't seems to consider that if you really did single-handedly solve X, then the founders might move the team lead on rather than risk losing you. Founders aren't stupid, they know who the value players are. They might be well aware of what's going on, but not to the extent that they risk losing you. If they are made aware of such a thing, you might find things change for the better.
In short, the problem is the team lead, and if the founders are made aware of it, things might change. If they don't, find another job.
0.3 = 3 * 10^-1, which is -1 order of magnitude
3 = 0.3 * 10^1, which is 1 order of magnitude
You are right that 5.48 is not an order of magnitude more than 1.86, however. They are the same order of magnitude.
Most places have had some kind of review process, but not all. My current job has no tests, no reviews, and no restrictions on committing to trunk/master.
The funny thing is, I haven't noticed that big of a difference in software quality, but the places with no tests/reviews are way more productive.
Your milage, of course, may very.
https://www.tesco.com/groceries/en-GB/products/300346570
0 - http://fabiensanglard.net/duke3d/build_engine_internals.php
Of course I'm not going to argue that anyone is as popular as the Beatles, but I'm pretty sure the Stones would also have had universal long lasting popularty if they had only been around for the same amount of time.
You also can't compare the wealth of McCartney to Jagger. Firstly, McCartney had a very successful solo career after the Beatles, during which time he released way more albums than the Stones in the same time period and did his own share of touring. Secondly, McCartney owns a significant music publishing catalogue and has other business ventures.
Of course exceptions cost a lot more on the failure path, but that's not generally the priority.
The Lammas eco-village [1] in Wales is very similar to the one in the OP, and is one of the driving forces for this kind of movement (and the One Planet scheme).
[0] https://gov.wales/docs/desh/publications/090521susdev1wales1...
Then, when challenger becomes the champion it's behaviour will be useless and the next challenger will either beat it easily, or will do the same and the cycle will repeat.
To protect against this, the challenger should have to beat all previous champions, not just the current champion.