I find it quite surprising that Danish high school students (the article isn't about university) apparently did write digital exams with internet access until now, so basically open book.
1,659 karma · joined January 8, 2021
For cars, the local certification authority themselves decides what is road-worthy or not, not VW et al. You can add third party parts without the manufacturers consent. This is not the case for Android or iOS attestation, you're pretty much at the mercy of the foreign manufacturer and their local laws.
A) held in contempt of court, if the authorities do not find what they expect for some reason and accuse you of using such techniques or
B) if you specify that such behaviour by law enforcement is overreach, have a clean way out for criminals, codified in law, heavily damaging the impact you may expect of such a law.
Wero is not supported by most shops (yet), Credit / Debit Cards often charge fees if the payment goes to a foreign country, direct transactions cannot be undone.
In my experience, you have to take at least one train early if you do not want to come late regularly. Even e.g. the main airport train line, used by tourists, often turns around before the actual airport due to delays.
If you live in the city itself, it's fine, you also have other options. If you live further away, it's barely acceptable to very bad, IMO.
It is reliable-ish, but more "Amtrak Capital Corridor"-reliable than "JR Yamanote Line"-reliable.
I cannot overstate how unexpected this was and is to me, we talk about people in their mid-twenties with jobs - maybe (video) streaming / subscriptions services actually overplayed their hand in the current economic climate.
Doesn't make me super optimistic in this regard.
[1] even if most of it is void in my jurisdiction anyway
I still think this specific reversion / change, for itself, would be something you can lobby for, though. It itself doesn't do harm, the push to include it in this specific bill may do (if it is the thing which tips the scale for it to be accepted).
This "tax cut" is (and was) simply the status quo in most western countries for virtually all businesses, e.g. in the EU. It itself is not immoral, as long as you see developers as normal office workers, which they IMO are.
The existence of silicon valley giants and their faults notwithstanding.
The oil and gas industry, and the tobacco industry et al., lobbied (and lobby) for things which they know were (and are) doing harm. This isn't the case here, IMO.
Code is not an asset in all (I would even argue most) cases - proven by companies which open source the vast majority of their code and live from service contracts or certain addons to it, and basically pay developers to commit to open source software.
Often they buy market- or mindshare. There is no way in hell e.g. Akamai wouldn't have been able to bootstrap "Linode 2". I'm unable to see the secret sauce why OpenAI couldn't have created their own VS Code fork instead of buying Windsurf. But why do that if you can acquire their existent customers / market share? Additionally, the term "acquihire" didn't plop into existence with no precedent.
Being able to immediately get a full deductible for salary, which in many (western) countries is the norm for virtually all businesses, does not strike me as particularly immoral. It's a normal office job, developers do not create gold out of thin air.
Big tech isn't even the most affected by this change, they (often) have obscene margins - small software companies do not.
(That's also the reason why foreign ccTLDs of, eh, semi-stable countries, e.g. .so domains, are risky - should the local operator start to lose it at some point, no-one can help you, neither ICANN nor IANA)
You have a small restaurant, often using things like WiX or Squarespace, against a tech company with a dedicated SEO team. Good luck.
It is significantly more fragile than a X220, though. And tbh, the screen looks the most fragile of any laptop I ever had, as there is an air gap behind the LCD, i.e. you really shouldn't hit it with e.g. a pen or something, at all, as it may flex and break. At least you can easily replace it, without ripping out glue, if it happens? :s
It also is not the best bang-for-buck compared to other new laptops, if you ignore the repairability. IMO understandable due to their smaller scale and additional engineering, but still true.
I use mine with Linux and it's great, you feel like a first-class customer like you do with e.g. a Systems76 machine (which are also nice), it's explicitly supported. Here is their support page for each motherboard: https://frame.work/de/en/linux
If you choose a mainboard with a new CPU, you may need to use a mainline kernel instead of LTS for a while, but that's it, in my experience.
Battery life is not on ultra book level, but it's at least on par with the X220. I get like 8, 9 hours out of it.
Can highly recommend it, even if it's not perfect.
The fuel storage facilities were mainly used to mix the fuel the Luftwaffe needed - they got almost all of their fuel from them.
Always wondered what made the allies wait for so long or why it apparently wasn't a high priority target - they had to know that it was there, there were two railway connections and large amounts of visible tank cars (which they did attack a few times with smaller planes) just a few hundred metres away, with a major military airfield close, and it was a (mostly) unpopulated area. There were bomber formations flying overhead for months at that point, as a big German city was just a few miles away.
It's not perfect, but this alternative is way worse.
Microsoft does have the leverage in this case, as long as folks want to continue using Windows.
Translation:
According to a T-Online[1] survey, hardly any Germans still want to buy Teslas. But suddenly the number of participants exploded. T-Online stops the survey.
100k people took part in a non-representative t-online survey last week - within just a few days. The question was: "Would you still buy a Tesla car?" The result was clear on March 11th: around 94 % of participants said "Absolutely not". In contrast, only around 3 % of participants chose "Yes, no problem".
Just one week later, the result looks different - and the number of participants has exploded. 467k people had voted by Tuesday evening (as of March 18th, 17:00 o'clock). Suddenly, around 70 % of survey participants want to buy a Tesla - the proportion saying "no way" has fallen to 29 %.
It was initially unclear where these votes - and the sudden change in opinion - came from. At first glance, the number of article views in the past few days and the number of survey participants do not match. Initial in-house research now shows that 253k of the votes cast came from just 2 IP addresses in the USA. This points to the possibility that the survey may have been manipulated.
Furthermore, T-Online noticed that the link to the evaluation article and thus to the survey was shared thousands of times on Twitter and other social networks. On Tuesday evening, Tesla boss Musk himself shared the article with the new, more pleasing result for him.
Musk's post collected 2,8 million views on Twitter within the first two hours. Since then, the number of hits on the survey has increased noticeably once again. On Tuesday evening, there were several hundred per minute. T-Online has stopped the survey until further notice and removed it from the relevant articles.
[1] it still could be a hijacked device from a botnet or else, yadayada, but still
Thus users are unlikely to detect that they're LNK files (in Windows), even with enabled extension.
(This may have changed with new versions of Windows 11, I'm stopped working in this area a few years back)
And no, sadly not. :(
The Baltics have no beef with Russia, but Russia with the Baltic states[4], according to e.g. Medwedjew, who thinks they literally belong to Russia. Or Россия 1[5].
[1] https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20250219-baltic-region-pr... [2] https://www.sab.gov.lv/en/news/russia-is-purposefully-develo... [3] https://www-bundestag-de.translate.goog/dokumente/textarchiv... [4] https://www.euronews.com/2023/05/17/russias-dmitry-medvedev-... [5] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fSJ6py0uVQ4, from 1:30 onwards
Doesn't Ukraine buy most of their heavy weapons from the US (... until now)? If so, isn't most of the tax payer money the US lends Ukraine going back into the US economy, softening the blow by a lot?
Did the (original) lend-lease act even hurt the US economy and US families? Or did it provide jobs and stimulate the US economy, cementing the role of the US as the military / industrial powerhouse they are today? I was under the impression that it's the latter, but I'm not sure, correct me if I'm wrong. Is this one different?
But sure, of course - that's the right of the US, even though it would be nicer not to retroactively break existing agreements. I only wanted to push back against the (new) lend-lease doing "absolutely nothing".
It's the same logic the US applied to lend-lease, didn't they? There was a good chance of the USSR collapsing until 1943, and you still helped them. Delaying an invading attacker, especially one who may plan, according to their own internal propaganda, to attack other nations later, is already more than "nothing".
The price for peace is living under occupation. Depending on the occupier, this can be a fate worse than death, and significant numbers of Ukrainians appear to think the latter.
And for a very selfish argument: It buys us, the Europeans, more time (with Ukrainian blood) to prepare for war, when Russia attacks the Baltics in a few years. Which we desperately need, as the US will likely break their promise and not help us under the current administration (and who knows who the US elects next).
The 3 years allowed e.g. the Baltics to build extensive defensive fortifications.
LMGTFY returned human results that weren't SEO rubbish at the time for the most part, which you could classify yourself (or by others) as trustworthy or not. ChatGPT itself still sometimes hallucinates on pretty basic information and other users don't get exactly the same result as you.
[1] "Someone else asked ChatGPT for you. Appreciate it."
OpenSSL implements crypto primitives, which, as far as we currently know, are mathematically safe. It's clear cut, black and white, it either is implemented correctly and (as far as we know) safe, or it isn't.
Snort works based on fixed rules. It's black and white, either traffic is logged and / or blocked, or it isn't. Basic rules log entire classes of traffic, the ability to engineer around them is very limited. Specialized Snort rules are a cat and mouse game, though.
At least two of the three things ROOST wants to do are machine learning models. They are not black and white, they are fuzzy. Minor changes can be enough to fool a classifier without changing the real semantic meaning for humans.
I have very, very hard doubts Google, OpenAI et al. will release Open Source classifiers which they will actually also use themselves.
Either they will try to get perfect recall, then it certainly will have (probably massive) overreach. Or there will always be false negatives. In the latter case, ML classifiers are IMO the one thing where security through obscurity not only actually works, but is the only thing which keeps them working at all. If you can freely train on an imperfect classifier, you can fool it, no?
I would love this, I like the Open Source approach a lot, but I cannot imagine how this should work in practice.
Also: How should third-party companies be able to reliably "set their own rules" on a probabilistic ML model, anyway, without training it themselves? The thing Roblox published[1] is a classifier for 6 categories. Sure, it's nice that you can e.g. say "I only want to filter profanity" this way - but what constitutes profanity is not controlled by you, but by the whims of a US company, even though this very much is not a globally homogeneous standard.
If it's a https URL: Yes, the TLS handshake. There are curl builds[1] which try (and succeed) to imitate the TLS handshake (and settings for HTTP/2) of a normal browser, though.
Also: Preventing the import of "foreign" knowledge / research seems completely insane to me, no offense, no matter how one stands on export. There is nothing justifying this, you're just kneecapping yourself.
[1] https://www.hawley.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Haw...