i would expect close to no 100LL burning planes use MEM.
966 karma · joined March 5, 2017
msxpert.com / vectorpanda.com
Alameda, CA
meet.hn/city/37.7652076,-122.241635/Alameda
i would expect close to no 100LL burning planes use MEM.
Remote: Yes
Willing to relocate: Travel, sure, but not Relocate
Technologies: Rust, Python, TypeScript, Node.js; ML/data systems (PySpark, EMR, SageMaker, Airflow, CatBoost, MTCNN-derived inference, vector search, embeddings, AI/deepfake detection); LLM-native engineering (Claude Code, Codex, MCP, OpenRouter, Beads); AWS (ECS, Lambda, Aurora/Postgres, DynamoDB, S3), Terraform/CDKTF, Docker, OpenTelemetry; bare-metal colo, Citrix Xen/XCPng.
Résumé/CV: https://www.msxpert.com/cv/
Email: mike@msxpert.com
Howdy! I'm Mike -- Data, ML, and Airplane nerd. Drama-free engineering. Looking for a new place to hang my hat, sling non-slop code, tell and listen to stories with interesting people. Reach out if you think I can help, I'd love a chat! :)
Right now, I couldn't declare "I'm right" about any part of what's going on in this space right now, and I'm surprised when others do so.
I'm not aware of anyone judging my taste in art and thinking less of me. If they judge, they do so silently.
To another's point, yeah, it's sad that Claude taking a brief hiatus just halts workflow. I imagine my whole team just started packing for a beach trip. Then again, I suppose if the CPA office computers go down, everyone doesn't dust off giant ledgers and quill pens and start working manually.
I pay for LLMs so I hope they don't leak that crassness into paying clientele -- but... how would I know if they did it subtly? I wouldn't! :/
To fool us into thinking writing is not AI generated, we will create "human-ifying" filters to the LLM. This will introduce common keystroke, grammar, and spelling issues that surely no automation would ever create on its own.
Soon the writing most vaunted and trusted will be the writing that appears written by a 4 year old with a crayon.
Sigh.
The audiobook is the peak experience still I think. Highly highly recommended
No argument though, just saying it's a hard problem, and the scaling issue makes it somewhat awkward to deploy security resources in proportion to the threat.
I don't have a solution. I'm not exactly thrilled with the current setup, but I try to stay quiet since I can't think of anything better.
Little planes, like this one [1] just don't do damage on the same scale as airliners.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Austin_suicide_attack
My current company bought me an M4 Pro / 24GB / 512GB.
There is a significant amount of dust on it. I use it every once in awhile when I need to access my corporate Apple ID which is tied to the thing. I'll be really sad if they force me to use it on the daily. Luckily nobody seems to be checking usage.
I know it's not what you asked, but I think it's where you're headed -- an adequately specced Mac instead of two half-spec. :) I can't imagine splitting a workload between two physical machines again -- like when I needed a PC and the M1. It's a real PITA to juggle boxes.
We're all in the same boat right now. Except for those who decry LLMs and loudly await the relevance of their artisanal coding skills to re-ascend. :)
Ugh.
Were you only interested in technology so you could be one of the chosen elders holding a rare and valuable skill? Bummer if so, I think that ship has sailed. If not sunk altogether.
Otherwise? I guess learn plumbing? I think we're still a few years away from Claude telling me "You're absolutely right! Let me unclog that toilet for you" :D
What i find IS tied to time of day is my own fatigue, my own ability to detect garbage tier code and footguns, and my patience is short so if I am going to start cussing at Clod, it is almost always after 4 when I am trying to close out my day.
Holy hell that's genius. I know what I'm printing tomorrow! :D