I might die tomorrow, i'm 35.
I might retire at the end of the week if my lottery ticket hits the jackpot. I might just leave the company.
619 karma · joined September 16, 2019
I might die tomorrow, i'm 35.
I might retire at the end of the week if my lottery ticket hits the jackpot. I might just leave the company.
Karen is now an accepted and understood term referring to a very real phenomenon. Anyone with half a brain knows it's not aimed at people named Karen.
There's a huge difference between being named Karen and being a Karen...
Every parent within my hometown would be getting arrested. And god forbid when these people learn that we were riding the public bus service to and from school at 10 years old...
bad: I disagree with the way this is done/this is just bad. Lets do X!
good: I see the motivation with the current approach and understand the goals but i wonder if we might be better served by doing X instead. Usually this allows for Y benefits, but I'm open to discussion here.
Add some fluff to ensure nobody gets defensive and articulate your flexibility (even if you don't really have it)
It's based on people assuming that others will use that veto reasonably. Company i work for had a veto system but i don't think it was ever used. It was also essentially 3 level system "hire", "probably not" and "i object to this person ever working at this company"
I've heard the latter being expressed a few times but only with candidates that nobody was keen on.
It's less energy efficient. It's significantly more time efficient and ergonomic.
Even full size residential fridges can be powered by the smallest portable generator.
This is totally not true. Usually they make jobs redundant not people. If there's a pool of people doing the same job and that headcount is reduced then it will often be the lowest performers that go however some places have done LIFO or cut the most expensive.
However if you're doing layoffs and you reduce your frontend team the it's likely low performers from the backend team get to stick around.
I certainly believe that there is no rigid social class in America and it's definitely possible to move between income brackets with relatively little social stigma. In the UK for example no matter how much money a working class person makes they will never become upper class. Never be welcomed into the top social circles etc., they didn't go to the right schools (pre-college) or dont have the right accent...
I'm not as blind to believe that parental wealth doesn't matter hugely. I also wonder if it might be more difficult to move income brackets in the USA due to the extremely high cost of education.
This is going to be a pain in the ass and you'll just lead to people gaming the system.
How about we just aim to make a high quality collage available to all who want it and extremely cheap and easy to finance so it's available to all?
I've yet to see an 18 year old that looks like an actual child regardless of how they're dressed however I'm also not looking for this sort of thing so...
For me this is true if I'm traveling for < 1 week If I'm gone for more than that i don't want to eat every meal out and want to have some food + drink stored in my accommodation.
The reason AirBnB exists is that tourists are not properly accounted for in city planning and not properly serviced by hotels. There's a huge demand for what AirBnB provides (Serviced and short term accommodation). Hotels are inadequate for longer stays or where you just want the comforts of home, a good middle ground is the "serviced apartment" concept found in some places (entire apartment blocks reserved for short term rentals) however there are times when you want an entire house, not an apartment.
Right now i think about how to re-define technical processes and patterns to reduce CFR, increase deploys etc.
When i was off work for a while i think about cooking, video games, restoring a car, emerging tech, how i can help others, refining social patterns etc.
There's not that long that I'm not thinking about something, just usually people pay me to think about something.
I also think humans need to do nothing occasionally and that it's actually extremely valuable. If you look at the entirety of human history this whole 5 days of work 48 weeks of the year is very new. For most of human history we would have had intense bursts of activity (hunting, harvesting, planting etc.) followed by quite a bit of nothing. I think even as recently as the middle ages the average person was working about 150 days a year (though often in bursts from sun-up to sun-down 6 days a week until the work was done).
I took a year off of work, i traveled some, spent time with my now ex-wife, kept up on the latest skills and did a couple personal projects. But most of the time i rested, had a lie-in every morning, worked on my cooking skills, and played video games.
At some point i aim to do a similar thing again and spend a year slowly re-modeling a house (this has the dual benefit of being fun, gaining me new skills and not being anything close to a year of full time labor)
I don't want to be here in 30 years time wishing we'd built reactors 30 years ago (which is where we are today)
yes
> you have a dedicated civil service that does most of the work and then a politician that may or may not know whats going on setting direction?
this is the ministers and their private secretary.
> have watched "The Think of It"
you should also watch "Yes Minister" i find it a bit more charming if a little dated, but also quite real.