1,297 karma · joined November 8, 2016
1. To the outside world, a LARPer might be indistinguishable from someone that actually needs perfect opsec. Maybe that LARPer in the coffee shop is Ross Ulbricht.
2. If one day you actually need real encryption, it will help if you've LARPed in the past.
Regulating emotions is arbitrary. Maybe it makes me sad that you post comments on HN. Should your comments be regulated?.
Physical harm is where you draw the line, because it's the only line that makes sense.
It's not legitimate to regulate manufacture or commercialization of products when that manufacture or commercialization poses no direct threat to the physical well-being of other individuals.
But when I smoke weed, I have to actively think about the position of keys in the keyboard in order to type coherent things. I have to type "by software".
The point is: maybe for some people, their spoken language is "hardware accelerated" and for others, thinking in words is too computationally expensive, so they resort to less expensive methods.
Or maybe it's the opposite. Thinking abstractly is the computationally expensive method but the improvement in decision making isn't worth the effort.
Disclaimer: I know absolutely nothing about psychology or neuroscience. I just like to think about it.
My music knowledge is limited to building major and minor triads (maybe adding a seventh here and there) and I still enjoy his videos.
Ads in a word processor are like ads in your house's wall.
Ads in a website are like ads in a football stadium.
A simpler URL, something like ddglite.com or ducklt.com
Package managers are an easy way to do things, most of the time. That's why brew exists.
They are not a universally good way to distribute and install software. It twists the relationship between the software developer and the user.
I don't want a middleman, I want to get my programs from the developer, and store them using the tools I know (regular files on a filesystem).
Are package managers easy to use (most of the time)? Yes.
Are package managers (as they exist today) a universal, well designed way to distribute software? No, because they impose a middleman.
The whole "centralized, trusted repository that has all your apps" system is wrong at a fundamental level.
The way shared libraries are used in Linux is built upon the assumption that package managers and centralized repositories are the right way to do things.
Low contrast between text and background, bonus points if the font is really thin.
Highlighting text does anything other than highlighting text (e.g. opening a menu to share quote on twitter)
Scrollbar highjacking
Clicking on background takes you away from the article (TechCrunch used to do this)
Scrolling down takes you to another article (some news sites do this)
I think parent comment wasn't asking for third party, non-GPL drivers to be mainlined, but for a stable interface for out-of-tree drivers.
> #define _GNU_SOURCE
If it's portable, what's the point of defining _GNU_SOURCE? Honest question.
Big tech companies will stop using Javascript and go full WASM. Non-tech Companies will still use Javascript, but popular Javascript frameworks won't be as big as Angular and React, they will be jQuery reincarnations.
Some important person is going to be hacked and the consequences will be bigger than you think.
Foldable phones will make a big fuss and then die just like netbooks did 10 years ago.
Google will try to replace Android and fail. Flutter will be discontinued.
Someone will try to dethrone Youtube, making a big fuss, and fail miserably.