665 karma · joined September 17, 2012
I understood everything in Profesor Tao's OP up to the part about "controlling a key matrix of phases" so the videos must have taught me something!
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVaSA_b938U&list=PLbaA3qJlbE...
[1] http://www.mmds.org/ Chapter 3 [2] https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.05698
[1] https://www.imperial.ac.uk/centenary/memories/JoaoCabral.sht...
Hygiene factors
- Never expose an error page to Google. - Never expose an empty page. - Make sure all content is visible on first page load (e.g. not behind pop ups). - Show the same content to Google as to users. - Make sure all relevant content is in the HTML (not loaded dynamically). - Make sure page load times are good.
Keywords
- Research keywords you need to match. - Build database of search terms you wish to match, grow and improve this database over time. - Carefully curate pages, their URLs and metatags to match these keywords. - Use this database to choose which pages to expose to Google and make sure that all links and pages have the correct follow/nofollow attribute. - Steadily grow the content you expose to Google over time, keeping the quantity and quality of content on pages exposed to Google high.
Site structure and internal links
- Organise your site in a shallow tree structure. Top level pages should have many links to lower level pages. - All levels of the tree should have keyword rich content which is useful to users. - Not every level of the tree needs to be visible in the Google search results, it is mostly to make things easy for the crawler.
External links
- Use PR and social media to generate good backlinks for your site. - Use social media like reddit, pinterest and others as well as facebook and twitter. - Do not generate fake backlinks, if Google thinks you are doing this they will give you a severe penalty.
Submit your sitemap
- Submit your sitemap in Google webmaster tools and make sure it is kept up to date at least weekly.
Bounce rate
- Carefully monitor your bounce rate and time on site for users coming from Google as these are key factors in Google rankings.
Click through rate
- Use descriptive and relevant titles and metatags to improve the click through rate from the Google search results to your site. - PR, social media, advertising and other channels can improve brand awareness that in turn improves click through rate. - Regularly check a selection of searches that you rank on to assess the quality of your Google search listings.
There are obviously downsides to renting time from random individuals though, so it's not suitable for a server-like workload. Good for development notebooks or training.
I'm not a Libertarian myself, but wanting to reduce the power of the state doesn't mean you believe in slavery.
[0] https://www.amazon.com/Business-Blockchain-Practice-Applicat...
Here's a talk on differential privacy applied to the overfitting problem [1]
[0] http://andyljones.tumblr.com/post/127547085623/holdout-reuse
Doesn't contradict what you said I just thought it was interesting that chrome doesn't just look for the most basic types of pop-ups.
This sort of anti-competitive coercion through overwhelming market power is why monopoly laws exist in the first place.
You did that on purpose ;)
1) Tolls are regressive. I believe cities in the US have power over some taxation so why not offset the extra cost by reducing another tax? e.g. property taxes in low value areas could be cut, or sales taxes. Alternatively spend all the toll revenue on heavily subsidising public transport so that it is cheap and plentiful.
2) Other cities have had tolls and it did not effect the traffic. Why not just raise the toll until it does effect the traffic? In London the charge for breaking Ultra-Low Emission Zone requirements will be £130/$160 after 2020. Raise the toll to $100 and it will have an effect.
Sounds though that the underlying issue is that LA's urban geography doesn't lend itself to public transport so that whatever you do people will still have to use cars if they want to travel any reasonable distance. Short of undertaking a Shanghai-metro level of construction (from nothing to the world's largest rapid transit system in 20 years.)
S[it] = b0 + b1 * X[it] + b2 * A[i] + b3 * D[it] + e
Where: S[it]: number of sessions originating on page [i] at time [t]
b0: base traffic for all pages
A[i]: base traffic for page [i]
X[it]: seasonal traffic for page [i] at time [t]
D[it]: dummy variable, 1 for after treatment 0 for control and before treatment
b3: effect size of treatment
e: noise/error term
Taking the average over time: E[S[i]] = b0 + b1 * E[X[i]] + b2 * A[i] + b3 * E[D[i]] + e
Take the average from S[it] (the first "differences"): S[it] - E[S[i]] = (b0 - b0) + b1(X[it] - E[X[i]]) + b2(A[i] - A[i]) + b3(D[it] - E[D[i]]) + e
which simplifies to: S[it] - E[S[i]] = b1(X[it] - E[X[i]]) + b3(D[it] - E[D[i]]) + e
Split all pages [i] in to control and treatment groups 0 and 1. Take the "difference in differences" of the two groups: (S[1t] - E[S[1]]) - (S[0t] - E[S[0]]) = b1(X[1t] - E[X[1]] - X[0t] + E[X[0]]) + b3(D[1t] - E[D[1]] - D[0t] + E[D[0]]) + e
Given D[0t] = E[D[0]] = 0, and for a large number of pages X[it] - E[X[i]] = X[jt] - E[X[j]]: (S[1t] - E[S[1]]) - (S[0t] - E[S[0]]) = b3(D[1t] - E[D[1]]) + e
Which gives a formula in the form of y = mx from which we can calculate the effect size b3 and the p value using linear regression.The key assumption is that X[it] - E[X[i]] = X[jt] - E[X[j]] for large numbers of pages. I found this assumption does hold in practice. I'm not a statistician so forgive me if I've made any statistical errors but I think this analysis is correct.
I might write up a blog post at some point to explain it in more detail.
If companies want to avoid tyranny in the workplace then perhaps it would be better to have bosses but allow a majority vote of direct reports to fire them. Give 360 reviews some actual teeth.
Of course they are learning a lot of other stuff at the same time so it's not really comparable.
The main exercise we used was to write down my thoughts, feelings, physiology and actions in response to a situation. Then we did it again for a more positive imagining of how the same situation could have played out. It's useful to see how each aspect effects the others and identifying how things could be changed helps a lot when the same situation arises again.
For sure it wouldn't be helpful to be wildly over optimistic, it must be very stressful to intentionally delude yourself. But the error bars on most of these judgements are so wide I don't see anything wrong with erring on the optimistic side.
Of course another skill is learning to avoid unhelpful judgements altogether. But that's a different topic and I won't pretend I have much insight there.
A coworker giving minor feedback is only contributing to your mastery. A boss giving you the same minor feedback is cutting in to your autonomy. The exception is when the purpose is great and sweating every detail is necessary or when the boss is a recognised master of your craft and their feedback is almost always correct and regularly helps you improve.
An example of the first case might be engineering at SpaceX and the second could be Steve Jobs giving engineers and designers product feedback. What I think a lot of people are missing in this thread is that in most situations the purpose is relatively uninspiring and the boss is significantly less skilled than the person she is giving advice to.
[1] http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/oct/17/jeremy-corby...