402 karma · joined April 19, 2011
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/sunil; my proof: https://keybase.io/sunil/sigs/Khp4kBX3lUdU73pBquUwPJyVWphXqF-ln8DXN-dbMo8 ]
>- You must pick up Clojure to understand and configure Riemann (we're not a Clojure shop, so this is a non-trivial requirement) >- Config file isn't a config file, it's an executed bit of Clojure code
This is actually great -- static files quickly become their own franken-languages, with code generating config files.
>- Riemann is not a replacement for an alerting mechanism, it's another signal for alerting mechanisms (though since it's Clojure and the configuration file is a Clojure script, you can absolutely hack it into becoming an alerting system) >- Riemann is not a replacement for a trend graphing mechanism.
You probably don't want another alerting mechanism; you probably already have pagerduty or something else -- what you want is a rich way to create the alert.
Mesos decides how many resources to offer each framework, while frameworks decide which resources to accept and which computations to run on them.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/2013/oct/02/david-c...
"Ultimately I believe the breakthroughs will come fastest if we can "close the feedback loop" by automating a lot of bench biology, and then have computers both generate and test hypotheses."
I don't know anything about bioinformatics, so I'm trying to see how this differs from vanilla automated model selection. I'm really interested, so please feel free to send me an email if you feel that's more appropriate.
I wasn't totally sure until I saw this: http://www.groupon.com/pages/kidz-club-games
Further, Daphne Koller is a serious force in the field, and seems to be a pretty good supervisor, so I'm guessing/hoping she is an interesting/engaging lecturer as well. Though, Stanford CS/Stats students are more able to comment on this last point.
[1] http://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/bugs/winbugs/contents.shtml
You've scuttled your own argument here.
Also, keep in mind that a man is twice as likely to be assaulted as a woman so from a statistical perspective it is men who should be fearing for their safety as they post their gender online.
Blatant misuse of "statistics." Not all assaults are equal. How many assaults toward men lead to their having thoughts of or committing suicide? Also, the implication that we should train women to a military standard so they are ready to fend themselves off from attack is absurd-- by your rationale, we should put all be proficient with switchblades and blame ourselves if we were unable to stop an attack. The causal is the perpetrator, and the culture that breeds feeling of ownership by men of women.
It wasn't so long ago that the law explicitly treated women as property, so let's not forget that too quickly. In the UK, it was in our parents' generation that women were allowed to have a mortgage (Sex Discrimination Act of 1975) and only two decades ago that marital rape exemption was abolished (until 1991, in the UK, legally a husband could not be charged with raping his wife).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_in_the_United_States#Rape_... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_in_English_law http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marital_rape#Common_law_and_the...
Also, I was never offered sherry at a tutorial, but I did have friends studying English who were offered wine~
On a related note, this is a good summary of the differences between English vs American values/elite educations: http://www.yaledailynews.com/news/2010/apr/23/whats-better-o...