1,476 karma · joined November 10, 2012
$550/TB for those who want to save a search.
Like when?
But how useful are names that this website shows, e.g. the first few random names I got were "Singapore Orchid", "Scented Spring", "Lamiaceae", and "Lunatic Sky Dancer"?
That at least the card they're paying with is not stolen (the real owner would start a dispute).
[1]: https://www.theguardian.com/law/2025/jun/06/uk-government-si...
How is ToS relevant to this thread?
How would that work if it's a patch to a project with a copyleft license like GPL which requires all derivate work to be licensed the same?
Depends on if you're a big business or an individual. There is absolutely no reason I would ever pay $100k for a traffic burst on my personal site or side project (like the $100k Netlify case a few months ago).
> It's better to set billing alerts and make the call yourself if they go off.
Billing alerts are not instant and neither is anyone online 24x7 monitoring the alerts.
Edit: Found more discussion here: https://github.com/plausible/analytics/discussions/1963#disc...
> To summarize, I believe the EDPB has made their position very clear on this in their 2023 guidelines: Plausible's fingerprinting is subject to Article 5(3) of the ePD. Plausible has made their position very clear in their blog post, leaning in the other direction. Until this is tried out in court, I don't believe that there will be any definitive answer.
What evidence did you find?
The only way this remains open source forever is to accept AGPL-only licensed patches.
[1]: https://github.com/redis/redis/blob/d65102861f51af48241f607a...
What kind of safeguards are possible with a web app?
Wasabi only allows as much egress as the amount of data you're storing and I don't think you can even pay for more: https://wasabi.com/pricing/faq#free-egress-policy.
> This project is licensed under the Apache License 2.0 - see the LICENSE file for details.
> This project offers a high-fidelity speech generation model *intended solely for research and educational use*. The following uses are strictly forbidden:
> Identity Misuse: Do not produce audio resembling real individuals without permission.
> ...
Specifically the phrase "intended solely for research and educational use".
Yeah, who puts an AI in charge of support emails with no human checks and no mention that it's an AI generated reply in the response email?
For a moment I thought they added AI integration to the open source Gutenberg plugin.