1,228 karma · joined July 4, 2009
http://selflanguage.org
http://russell-allen.com
http://russellallen.com.au
This is a blow against the freedom of the press and a blow against a free and open society. There is a reason why we should as a society respect journalists and their sources. I hope the perpetrators are prosecuted and jailed.
And Richard is right - the real threat to open systems is not so much the obviously closed systems like Apple but the almost open systems like Android that are open enough to release the valve on community pressure but that aren't open enough to give us real freedom and control.
On the plus side, things are still in flux. For example, Inferno is now available to run on top of the free Android Linux kernel: http://www.android-dev.ro/2011/09/17/hellaphone-inferno-os-f...
As a thought experiment, try explaining the above post to a 13th century feudal Lord.
Even in this article, stuff like:
Finally, in 1983 the US Air Force sponsored a review of NASA's estimates of the probability of shuttle failure. NASA's estimate was 1 in 100,000. The contractor used Bayes and estimated the odds of rocket booster failure at 1 in 35. In 1986, Challenger exploded.
makes me uneasy. The rhetoric is too clearly marked.
Perhaps we're all afraid of looking stupid... easier to discuss Job's retirement or something less scary :)
Anyway, to drop down a metalevel, this is fabulous but also interesting for what the lambda calculus doesn't talk about - concurrency and more broadly time. I'd like to see more pages like this but which come from an actor model of computation or some other process calculus.
You're undercharging :)
But apart from that you're exactly right.
Every six months or so I check out OpenOffice/LibreOffice to see whether the documents I'm being sent survive the open/edit/save cycle.
Every time so far I end up with a document with widely differing formatting from the original.
So at least for me, LibreOffice isn't suitable for my usage patterns.
I imagine other people are the same.
Forget for a moment that we're talking about people whose beliefs we (presumably) strongly disagree with and imagine another scenario - say youth at a Democrats rally are given T-Shirts with Obama on them, take them home and find that after a wash they have a pro-T-Party slogan. I would think that pretty unlikely to change anyone's mind. They're more likely to be pissed off.
I can imagine the Exit people watching the concert and giggling at their clever prank. Cute prank, amusing, but as a technique for persuasion?
It does reduce fussing, for example when signing a multiparty contract, but it doesn't fundamentally change or services.
Standard contracts were always available and any decent lawyer has their own precedents, but part of what the client is paying for is how to use those precedents.
Just like standard open source software is available, but people still pay developers and sys admins...