16,455 karma · joined December 3, 2009
I still code for fun.
I write detailed specs for AI. Although I feel like this is, or is about to be, obsolete.
I read books.
I play chess.
I play words games.
I make stuff with wood and tools.
I go more places.
I cook more food.
I am not jaded about any of this. I am highly adaptable and refuse to think about myself as a victim.
I am optimistic and excited to see what the future holds. But it will require much adaptation and reflection on my identity as part of that process.
My police chief is okay with it and the case number "abc123" is FOIA-exempt out of operational security concerns.
I'd love to be able to tolerate Safari, but it's just not a good day-to-day desktop browser.
It's hard not to, given your comments in this thread.
- I had to write a moderately complex program. I didn't want to do it in C, and I didn't want to learn Rust.
- So I spent roughly about 2 hours becoming familiar with Go and playing around in Go playground. I decided that this would work.
- And then I got started on my program and I was immediately productive and that software is still running today, along with all the other stuff I've written since then.
Programmer productivity is excellent with Go. And it has a thriving ecosystem. Of course, some things could be better, but I don't really have much issue with it's error handling or types.
The article specifically discusses how Go is well-suited for LLMs. It's not going on about general programming topics.
https://old.reddit.com/r/electronics/comments/g6vyjc/old_ele...
I tried to get my kids interested with the modern equivalent, Snap Circuits, but they didn't take to it. It was too limited and toy-like.
I later acquired an old electronics kit like the above, and they were much more interested in that. You can still find the older kits on eBay for not too much money.
Keep in mind they may not take to it like you did. My kids' own interests went to more mechanical stuff and small gasoline engines and electric motors instead.
Don't steer their interests, feed them. Provide breadcrumbs for their curiosities.
What am I missing?
We don't have to like it. From Larry's perspective, our natures are strange and perhaps repulsive to him.
Maybe Zuck has, but I haven't seen a pledge that he'll keep models open. And even then, he might not stick to his word, citing dangers or some other excuse.
But yeah, open models is a great concept.
In other words, Larry Ellison is going to do what Larry is going to do, and there's no use wondering why.
Usually, that's to make money and sue people, at any expense. It's in his nature.
"Use only ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English when communicating with me or writing documents, comments, and other communications intended for humans."
As a result, I've never seen Claude or Codex use it's weird terms like "load-bearing".
(This isn't a condemnation. AI can often do a better job of representing thoughts than humans.)
Examples:
- The article organization
- The general language flow
- The bullet points with a bolded gist, a colon, and then elaboration (and bonus with details stats).
- The images are almost certainly AI generated. They look AI generated.
- Don't do any of it on work equipment, otherwise your employer may own your works. Do you like being sued?
- Don't discuss it with people at work, otherwise your employer may own your works because: time and IP. Do you like being sued?
Keep your mouth shut, use your own equipment and probably even network (eg: cell) and you should be fine. Or do you like being sued?
Put another way, don't you think companies have considered this? It's a rather obvious idea. So, assuming it's been considered, why don't they do it?
Spoiler: it's probably not economically viable based on the current consumer client, which is "buy cheap, throw away when broken, repeat". It's pretty sad how quickly the US has gone from repairable to throw-away products all while proclaiming concern for the environment.
In other words, all things have their end.
Nobody in the commercial space is going to follow step 4. It inhibits growth and innovation and increasing profit margins. LTS support would cost a lot of money and my guess is that would not gain enough traction to make it profitable for them. Otherwise, they'd already be doing all of this. I mean, it's talked about constantly in commercial circles.
I drop down to a Mini model for file-based tasks.
Codex keeps trying to revert me back to 5.6 but 5.6 seems to use too many tokens to do the same or slightly inferior job.
I am only on multiple $20 plans.
If it wasn't, it would've been flagged or not voted up, and you wouldn't be here complaining about it. :-P
> Hundreds of musicians died today.
Whom? With the status of Kavinsky?