432 karma · joined October 28, 2009
You’d need to use an approach that links the output to a closed set.
What if it says "D"? What if it tries to say "Additional details needed"?
(Also no calibration, etc.)
That really put me off.
I’m looking for something that pushes portability without compromising too much core usability.
For example I can live without a touch screen if it means high quality physical buttons.
Looking to pick one up, any recommendations on X4 Pro vs Classic?
Hoping a winner emerges with some real momentum behind it.
Don’t see any on eBay for dirt cheap, wonder what author paid (he said a fraction of retail).
I bough an Octominer for ~$150 which has power and PCIe slots and a basic Celeron and should let me expand to as many GPUs as I want.
I considered the P100s but I think the V100 16GBs are a better deal at $250. The 32GBs are way too much though.
I'd love to see some performance data.
To your question: it’s the difference between one person and an agent working on something vs an experienced dev and the entire community.
Time and tokens too of course.
From my limited time using pure Pi, I found quite a few of the plugins lacking and had no desire to upgrade/fix and maintain them myself. I know others feel differently though.
I like the idea of keep Pi minimal but having “official”, high quality optional plugins to make it more usable.
Might be different if it was something truly useful or novel vs a nerd snipe.
Very impressive that he pulled it off in a relatively short amount of time.
I know MCMC isn’t your goal, but seems like this could be used for ABC-MCMC (as is?)
Would also be nice to have an option to plot using a KDE vs histograms.
(Also your FM example seems to be technically PM)
I like to vet my options before committing to new software but who knows if the authors are gonna support these in a month? I don’t want to waste Fable tokens to fix bugs myself when they crop up.
I have a lot of compose files in my homelab/automation setup and those are what I’m most concerned about.
Edit: 3.6 not 3.7!