- Selected Stories - Anton Chekhov
- Death in Venice - Thomas Mann
- The Burnout Society - Byung-Chul Han
Currently I am reading an Austrian economics classic - Economics in one lesson by Henry Hazlitt
185 karma · joined October 6, 2020
- Selected Stories - Anton Chekhov
- Death in Venice - Thomas Mann
- The Burnout Society - Byung-Chul Han
Currently I am reading an Austrian economics classic - Economics in one lesson by Henry Hazlitt
edit: who am I telling this ;)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yrtDgoqWmgM
The commercial product, Foundry, is very well documented and an extensive Data Platform that allows to build data pipelines (similar to Databricks) and build low code / no code applications on top. If you master it, its incredibly powerful but complex
Also the engineering / product culture @Palantir is diametrically opposed to what exists at SAP, so I favour Palantir.
> Thiel by contrast is profiting from the use of AI weapons targeting systems used in the Ukraine war and the genocide in Gaza.
Thiel is IMO not doing this for profit. He is deeply ideological, which should be more worrisome.
If you use Athena you still have to worry about shuffling and joining, it is just hidden.. It is Trino / Presto under the hood and if you click explain you can see the execution plan, which is essentially the same as looking into the SparkUI.
Who cares about JVM versions nowadays? No one is hosting Spark themselves.
Literally every tool now supports DataFrame AND SQL APIs and to me there is no reason to pick up SQL if you are familiar with a little bit of Python
Especially when considering testability and composability, using a DataFrame API inside regular languages like Python is far superior IMO.
Still don't get why one of the biggest player in the space, Databricks is overinvesting in Spark. For startups, Polars or DuckDB are completely sufficient. Other companies like Palantir already support bring your own compute.
This would be such a game-changer. I am also convinced that monorepos will become the de facto standard, since it is way easier for LLMs to navigate / implement features across the whole stack.
And even on Gotham there is countless footage etc. on Gaia, Dossier, Meta Constellation etc.
They had to disclose this during the IDO, why are journalists just scratching the surface when discussing Palantir.
It is obviously a tech company that has a clever business model, deploying their engineers and PMs into the board room of Fortune500s and solving their problems.
Not trying to defend Palantir, but the journalistic work is just poor.
Today it suffers from feature creep and too many pivots & acquisitions. That they are insanely bad at naming features doesn't help either.