Consider: https://cate.blog/2019/05/08/where-do-you-start-when-a-team-...
1,790 karma · joined March 12, 2018
Consider: https://cate.blog/2019/05/08/where-do-you-start-when-a-team-...
Who can argue with this, from the next to last page: "For sixty years, we have called the threat of totalitarian surveillance ‘Orwellian’, but the word no longer fits the threat. The better word now may be ‘Californian’. A truly sophisticated system of social control, of the kind being pioneered in China, will not compel obedience, but nudge people towards it. Rather than censoring or punishing those who dissent, it will simply make sure their voices are not heard. It will reward complacent behavior, and sideline troublemakers. It’s even possible that, judiciously wielded, such a system of social control might enjoy wide public support in our own country."
I mean to say, agree or disagree, that's solid writing.
“the [engineering] profession must assert itself towards its most magnificent aspirations—for so much of our future is in your trust.”
What am I missing? Why is this a doomed, pointless, quixotic waste of time? It looks like a good fit for moving toward better things. I must be missing something important.
Otherwise, you'll need to wait until Mid-June for an official preview build to drop"
How does that work? The whole lead in was specific about complete failure.
https://sandspiel.club/#dac3ceca6a45502e8dc5
click play in the top right after it loads.
Peguy is not the most revolutionary philosopher since Plato.
Evidence: "It is for this reason that his stylistic response to Bergson exceeds that of the modernists: he is not interested, as with Marcel Proust or Virginia Woolf, in merely reporting the supposed “givens” of subjective consciousness and memory (which is in effect to reduce Bergsonism to phenomenology), nor in expressing pure symbolic replicas of duration that are then paradoxically timeless, as in the case of sheerly abstract art."
Then wraps up and ends.
We don't have a killer app.