I Sell Onions on the Internet
deepsouthventures.com
deepsouthventures.com
It's funny and beautiful how a moment of whimsy ends up being a fulcrum point in his life.
It seems there's a lot of interest in gardening / food production among tech people. For me, one of the reasons I love gardening is because in many ways it's totally different from working inside with machines, but there are important and unexpected overlaps. For example if you have a solid understanding of the OSI model which informs your method of system design, you can easily move into gardening where knowledge of the layers of a forest plays a similar role. Having this experience in tech makes it easy to zero in on similar structural principles in gardening, learn about them, and apply that knowledge whereas many others clearly don't.
Just like a person who doesn't understand the value of a proper foundation in tech (hardware, lower protocols like DNS, etc.), a similar gardener won't first seek to build strong healthy soil, and they will constantly fight against nature rather than work with it, doing more work while getting fewer results.
As an aside, regarding onions: last year I cut off some green onion bottoms from the store and put them in the ground (including the little roots). They grew back and gave several more green onion harvests before winter set in, and now they're back on their own! Permanent green onion. You can do this with a number of plants, btw. Try it!
And yet, I can spend another 5 minutes in the grocery store agonizing over which of two near-identical bags of chips to buy. Funny how that goes.
They still do, depending on where you live. My daughter brought home a sunflower seed from a field trip last spring. By the end of summer we had a 7ft tall sunflower growing next to our deck. This year we have several more already sprouting in that area.
It also had a side effect of really enhancing the plot of pretty terrible clay soil we plucked it in. Lots of herbs we attempted (and failed) to grow last year are already starting to flourish this year in that spot.
I posted a bitchy comment using a throwaway account on Reddit about ten years ago.
It directly led to me moving across the country, getting hired at Google, and finding myself in my dream job doing programming language stuff full-time.
Life is weird, man.
Also, Vidalias (and, really, all of the alliums) are wonderful.
So here I was "in the game industry" and spending zero time actually making games. I posted a rant complaining about that.
Some random redditor said, basically, "I work at Google. If you're a decent C++ programmer, I'll put in a referral for you."
Meanwhile, my wife and I had taken a trip to the Pacific Northwest and decided we wanted to move to that area. I started looking for jobs at other game companies in Seattle. I flew out there to interview at ArenaNet. Since I had a referral, a Google recruiter expedited an interview at the Seattle office while I was in town. I wasn't very seriously considering Google, but I wasn't about to say no.
I bombed the ArenaNet interview. (I think the main sticking point was a question around the time complexity of adding an element to a growable array. I said it was constant, but couldn't effectively explained amortized complexity to them and they didn't seem to understand that amortized complexity existed at all.)
Wonder of wonders, I just squeaked through the Google one.
I ended up on a random project doing front-end programming in JavaScript because I had UI experience. I didn't care for the product and programming UI in JS is, uh, not my idea of a good time, so it wasn't super fun.
However, I randomly took a one-day improve class that Google offerred. There, I met another Googler on another project and we started talking about language nerd stuff. He later ended up forming a team to work on Traceur, which was a project to prototype language changes to JS. They were ramping up, and he remembered I was into language things, so I asked me to join.
That project wound down later so I went looking for other projects to join. Dart was ramping up then and went there. It's been a blast.
But, literally, if I hadn't posted a comment on reddit and taken this improv class, my whole career might be different. I might have left Google to rejoin the game industry or something else entirely.
My life pivoted on a similar moment of whimsy. When I saw the post about the first startup school way back in the day, I just randomly decided "you know what, it's on the other side of the country but I'll just sign up and figure it out". Ended up flying to Boston on a super cheap flight, crashing on my friends couch who was in grad school at MIT, and meeting Steve and Alexis (of reddit), and that's how I ended up working for reddit 18 months later.
My first job out of college happened because I met and befriended one specific person in college (was there for 5 years).
My second job (and first startup) happened because I went to a 4-person dinner/game-night at a friend's (who I met at that first job) house, and talked to one of the other attendees who was interviewing at this company, and was willing to refer me (was barely there for a year and a half, but it fundamentally changed my view of work and employment).
Fast forward, and my current job (nearly 8 years now) happened because I checked an email account that I hadn't looked at in several years (and saw a recruiting email of a type I'd usually ignore), because I was trying to sign into some random account on the internet and I'd used that email address as the recovery account, many years before.
Obviously there was more to it than those single events, but each of those things were essential in opening up the opportunity in the first place.
My personal life and social circles often grew from similar simple, one-off, surprise events.
Also - predators. You can buy ladybugs in most garden centers for almost nothing, and they eat aphids for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. Literally.
[1] https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/39835357-no-waste-kitche...
It's weird to think about being on this side of a potential life changing choice, but it's really not nearly as big of a deal to me (I'm keeping my fully remote-friendly job) as some people seem to think it is!
I really hope more people do it more often! It's a very effective and wholesome way to foster understanding and spreading of good ideas, and dampening the damning effects of a lot of tribalism in today's political climate.
> [...] she interrupted me mid-sentence and hollered in exaltation to her husband: ” THE VIDALIA MAN! THE VIDALIA MAN! PICK UP THE PHONE!”
The happiness I feel reading that is so sublime. His work is needed and appreciated -- and what a humble trade with a beautiful simplicity to it. It is repeatable; others could do this too! Imagine what our communities would be like if most families had a little something like this. It reminds me of G.K. Chesterton's "Three Acres and a Cow" [1] slogan (implying that can be enough).
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributism#Economic_theory
The plan was I'd just run to the local grocery store and just fulfill online orders and if demand was there, purchase from local farmers. I didn't get any further than than just mentioning the business idea. Kudos to Peter for executing and meeting a need. Looks like he also owns onions.com, so they are making enough money to acquire that domain name.
https://www.myfreshgrocer.com/nkz/exec/Phone/Product/Display...
https://www.dropbox.com/s/g7q4injeb2w8du8/Screenshot%202019-...
I suspect that, like vinyards, if demand stays up long enough we'll find all sorts of weird little spots all over the world with nearly the right kind of soil and moisture and heat.
[edit] Rereading: It's a regional appellation but the taste has much to do with low sulfur content in the soil.
This is such an excellent quote and motivational.
Thanks for a great article :)
More seriously, how much interaction do you have with the farmer(s)? Seems like there would need to be a lot of communication to make something like this work.
Super cool story!
And yes, I communicate quite frequently with the farmer. We got along quite well, and I'm fortunate for the friendship I have with him & his team.
And this is what every company finds out eventually. Shipping is key and out of your control. Thus, Amazon starting its own fleet of air carriers.
I wouldn't say every company. Just the ones shipping products that are relatively heavy.
- A captivated reader
There's certainly value in being The Vidalia Man, having connections within the industry, and owning the domain. At the same time, the lessons you've learned (not to mention the platform you've built) could apply to just about any other niche agricultural product, such as ramps in the northeast, or southern flour.
How do those two tensions play against each other when it comes to deciding where on the spectrum between "I sell onions and only onions" and "I will become the next Amazon" to fall?
Congratulations! You're an inspiration. A few questions, if I may:
1. Do you plan to expand to other produce other than just the onions?
2. How did you arrive at your current business model (like min order quantity, areas served, return policy, shipping rates etc)?
3. How do you deal with customer complaints, in particular, with something as prone to decay as organic produce?
4. What significant part of the way you do this business changed after v1? Esp, as multiple customers would have inevitably given you comments and suggestions.
5. You mentioned you're registered as a LLC. You don't intend to raise VC money? For instance, YC prefers not to invest in LLCs.
6. What does the tech stack look like (Shopify? Weebly? AWS? Frameworks? Payments? etc)?
I'm quite fond of buying domains myself. I just came here to tell you I'm so happy to have found someone with a hobby like mine, though it is more accurate to call yours a business. My wife hates it, but many of the ideas I have had, have started with a domain name and that being my lift off point.
I tend to buy 1 year registrations for $8 like they're lotto tickets or something.
Are they people who graduated and moved away, looking for a little bit of home? I'm suspecting a fair number of Gatech alumni, for one. Or people like me who have to negotiate the onion content of dishes very carefully with friends and family (shallots and Vidalias make that easier).
This is the first time this has ever happened to me in my life.
Though I've only been 35 or older for a year. Should I expect more decisions like this?
:)
"I'm a web guy. I’m not a farmer."
I already knew that, because in just a couple paragraphs, I was already recognizing the style of writing as... SEO, "influencer", I don't know what to call it?
It's a personal first-person voice, which right off the start tries to establish that the author is a human being writing about their life -- but also that they are an expert in what they are going to tell you about, and very successful too.
The text includes many one or two sentence paragraphs, and has aggressively styled pull quotes and/or callouts. Short sentences too. Not entirely complete sentences. Interspersed.
It makes sure to open up with some kind of very short story that is only tangentially related to the content but is folksy and cute. (Smuggled vidalia's onto cruise ship).
The information is very cleverly structured to keep you reading, by dropping just enough of the actual info, page to page, to pique your attention and make you think there's an interesting story here, but not enough that you can leave having actually learned anything before you've read a pretty big chunk. And is written artfully for this purpose, it works, and keeps you reading. Sometimes at the end you feel rewarded, other times you feel like it was a shaggy dog story. The best authors leave you happy, of course.
It's got information to convey, but the goal is not to convey the information as effectively as possible, but to keep you reading as long as possible -- and, usually, to sell you something.
I don't know if I have a value judgement on it exactly -- okay, I'll admit it annoys me, perhaps because it all sounds the same while trying to convince you it's a folksy authentic voice. But either way, it's a thing, a genre even, that I'm not sure I've seen anyone comment on.
It's: "Content Marketing Voice".
(Also selling people onions on the internet is "purpose over profit", really? What the world needs now is frictionless access to vidalia onions shipped directly to your home?)
Still, more interesting than most...
I think you missed the point about "purpose over profit", it really gave this guy a feeling of that. And him telling that personal story is valid. It's interesting to think about why you seem to have deliberately side-stepped the point of the story.
Actually, analyzing and thinking about the way you wrote this comment, it seems you're just bitter that someone found something they really liked, that gave them a sense of purpose, and now you're trying to find some way to diminish that to yourself, to make yourself feel better, without actually taking the responsibility to do something to make your life better. Which tells us that you wished you had that purpose, but you feel you don't.
Some free advice: go about making that purpose for yourself, rather than making yourself feel better by trying to diminish the achievements of others that trigger you right in the feels. Another way to say it is, instead of making it all about this guy, when you get triggered, stop and think about "why do I feel that way?" and go deep into that. It's not about other people. What you feel is about you. Learn from that. Don't project, don't take it out, don't blame others, just learn from that uncomfortable emotion you're writing this thing to avoid.
Don't get me wrong, this is more than advice. I've seen that attitude cause a lot of unnecessary hurt and conflict in the world and in relationships, and I want people to stop it.
It's a pattern I've see a lot. Definitely has it's own genre voice as well.
Wow. You sure read a lot into someone's analysis of a writing style. One that I think accurately described the details of the piece of writing. I'm trying to summarize my feelings on your post without actually being hostile, but I can't help but find your entire comment to be really low value, even if it was meant well.
Certainly. It is still interesting to analyze as a genre, this is how we make sense of the written world. Perhaps you are doing that same assumption of purpose with my writing.
> I think you missed the point about "purpose over profit", it really gave this guy a feeling of that.
Is the point of "purpose over profit" to engender a feeling of purpose in the people who think they are doing it? Is that the "purpose"?
I think everyone should endeavor to treat their customers, suppliers, and coworkers with respect as human beings, instead of trying to take them for all they are worth. I agree doing so will make you happier. Which can perhaps be surprising to someone who tries it and has never done it before, how much it improves their own life. This is called being a decent human being, and there's no reason for everyone in every job not to do it. There's nothing wrong and a lot right with trying to behave like a decent human being in whatever business you are in, it's commendable, but it's not "purpose over profit."
I think it's disingenuous to elevate the idea of "treating people like humans instead of just instruments for my own profit, while at my profit-focused endeavor" to "purpose over profit", and disrespectful to people who really do make significant material sacrifices for a non-profit-oriented purpose.
What do you think his "purpose" was here, and in what ways were any profits sacrificed for it?
- Least expensive order is a 5-pound box for $34.95
- Runs on Shopify
- As they're seasonal, there are some built-in scarcity aspects I hadn't thought of (which is kind of neat business wise).
Two aspects I might try if this was my business:
1. Some kind of "Chef/Restaurant" option
2. An option to send 1 beautiful onion (ala the referenced Harry and David's)
I sincerely believe that our society would be much happier and healthier if top-shelf/"celebrity" vegetables existed that could cost $XX, sort of like in Japan.
Someone would probably pay $1000+ for "The best dozen onions of the season"
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/jul/13/us-food-...
Vegetables can vary by an order of magnitude in nutritional density based on growing and harvest conditions. I wish there was a way to pay 10x for vegetables that are reliably 10x more nutritionally dense (as verified by laboratory analysis of random samples from every harvest).
What could make an onion beautiful enough to buy for $100/ea? If you made these, I bet you'd find a market in Japan. Could make a good gift for people who like cooking.
Reminds me that middlemen provide value in a lot of ways, even though they are hated and everyone thought the internet would disintermediate them all.
[0] - https://success.docker.com/article/docker-hub-user-notificat...
[0]https://www.amazon.com/Start-Small-Stay-Developers-Launching... | https://startupbook.net
>> if a little dated
Argh! I know. I literally opened the Doc this week to start to parse out sections to update. It’s overdue ;-)
I'll see myself out.
But seriously, this is the type of side projects I dream of. Not the next soul sucking social network, but rather something meaningful and real.
Edit: Send me an email and I will be happy to let you know when we launch.
Current social networks allow you to hit "join" or "like" and that's all the participation you need to get your validation. You're part of the group just by signing up, rather than because you helped make it a community by contributing.
That's probably why this story resonates with people here so much. It's not just a tech business, it's an attempt to contribute and be an integral part of the local community. Not something every startup gets to do.
Like an onion
I believe M&T is a single farm/growing operation.
That being said what he's doing is something that is hard to reproduce simply because Vidalia onions cannot be grown except in a certain geographic area. You can take the same onion and grow it elsewhere, it will taste exactly or very close to the same, you just cannot sell it as a Vidalia. I'm surprised that there aren't more of the boutique style shops for things like Vidalia onions, Georgia peaches, etc.
Source: born, raised, lived whole life in Ga within a farming family.
The EU has a system-wide concept of products (mostly but not exclusively foods) that are by definition produced in a set region, by a particular method etcetera called the Protected Designation of Origin. This is inspired by laws in some of its member states (most famously France's AOC laws which protect Champagne) but because it's a system rather than being stapled into the law for one specific product it makes it practical to use for less famous things where the heavy lifting of actual legislation would be too much to ask. If your town produces a peculiar furry hat, and then one day sales of the furry hats begin to drop off because it turns out somebody is making replicas in China and selling them under your town's name, applying for PDO is a relatively straight forwad way to fix that across the entire EU without trying to attract attention from legislators in two dozen countries.
Of course PDOs can be abused (e.g. arguably protection of Newcastle Brown Ale was pointless, its only producers were indeed in Newcastle, but when they decided to move they simply applied to discontinue the PDO status...) but overall it seems like having a framework makes more sense than only doing this as actual national legislation (a rule saying Vidalia onions are from Georgia only works because the US government enforces it, the part in Georgia state law has very little effect)
It's why you can buy "Swiss Cheese" from Wisconsin and Bourbon Whiskey from Orlando.
I didn't grow up in one of the counties that are considered under the bounds of the Vidalia area (although pretty close) but we grew the same onions. They tasted, smelled, and looked exactly the same. Were I to try to sell them as Vidalias I could have been sued, but we were growing them for personal consumption anyway.
4165 Highway 101 North, Tillamook, OR 97141
I know you're probably joking, but you should order some. They're delicious.
Even more simple than that really, taking an existing industry and using a domain name to create a front end to that industry.
There is opportunity everywhere. Especially if you don't require creating a billion dollar company.
Thanks for sharing Vidalia Man.
This is why it’s more common for people that are already well off to be entrepreneurs[1] — they have a safety net.
[1]: https://qz.com/455109/entrepreneurs-dont-have-a-special-gene...
Source: I have owned multiple small businesses.
Or put other way - I'd love to find some great "regular" business ideas to both fund and assist in getting off the ground to the tune of $5-50k, and if successful make a few thousand a month down the road in a couple years - not millions on some future exit.
Basically I want to seed-fund/invest in/be involved in what HN calls "lifestyle business" - just a regular old sustainable business expected to grow 10% a year and comfortably employ a couple founders and employees.
Many good reasons this market doesn't exist and is "hard", but one can wish. It would feel fare more satisfying to invest money in actual hard working people with real but boring (read: low risk) business models than tossing it into the S&P500 or engaging it yet more rent-seeking by buying up small properties to turn into rentals.
I could scrape the $5K to get an idea off the ground, but if it failed I’d regret it. Simply put, it’s not money to risk.
To respond to the "rent from investment property" concept, you can get in on investment properties at a fairly low price (IIRC 40% discounts) if you invest when builders are looking for prospective buyers. i.e., before anything is built. I looked into doing this some time ago, but the builder couldn't find enough buyers, so the property was never built.
I've been trying to work this out, that seems like a massive discount, what's the expected profit margin for the builder? Surely not much more.
Why not get a loan? Would be cheaper, certainly on the land. I don't get it, something doesn't add up for me.
The situation you're describing seems to suggest that it would be better to split up the permitting and the building.
Company A buys land, gets permits, then either sells on to a builder, or contracts a builder.
But then I don't understand why so much capital would be required just for getting permits.
I'm guessing it's another example of different countries doing house buying/building differently, and none of them optimal.
There are lots of permits that only become available much later in the process. For example, an occupancy permit is only granted once the building is in a habitable state.
There are always permit delays of some kind or another because no matter how much research and planning you do, there are things that are simply unknown or that have to be changed (and thus re-permitted) at the proverbial last minute.
It comes down to: if you are interested in real estate investment (either renting or flipping), you are going to find the property more valuable than a bank, who isn't as interested and would just auction it off if they had to own it.
I remember that it was a substantial savings, but I can't say exactly where the 40% number came from. It was condos in a retirement community so the builder was making a big deal of "these tenants won't leave until they die..."
Edit: Don't know why this is objectionable. $5k is like one months living costs in many places, and sometimes one months savings. You aren't going to get much in return for that. You need to go somewhere cheaper where that kind of money can buy someone some time. Unless you can provide something else.
The good thing about a business like this is that it's much less likely someone is going to swoop in and steal your idea and customers because you took a little longer to work out the kinks.
We all seem to agree like things like this is a good thing, but then we undermine people's ability to do it by favoring things like real estate, domains and "middle man businesses" instead.
I guess bunnie said it best: "supply chains are made out of people" https://www.bunniestudios.com/blog/?p=4266
Real business is hard because of all the not obvious things you need to account for.
In Shenzhen you might make hundred boards, go down to the market and buy a hundred boxes and leave them with the shipper. Boards don't work? Re-work them or make another hundred. Box doesn't work? Buy another box. You don't like your box supplier? There is a hundred others on Taobao.
In NYC it might take you weeks to do the same thing while you are bleeding rent (and everything else) so you need the thousand boards and boxes to make it work (or you are selling very few in your spare time). And if something goes wrong you are probably fucked.
I am exaggerating, but you get the idea.
Well, there's a massive middle ground between plastic bags on eBay and placing a $10,000 order for boxes. I didn't mean to imply they couldn't eventually place a $10k order, but often you can order in smaller (but still large) quantities to check the quality. Or just use Uline for a while until you've gotten samples from enough locations to confirm a provider can service your needs.
We don't have the details of this part, so a lot of things could have gone into the decision to place a bit order which made it what appeared to be the correct choice at the time. I just thought it sounded a bit risky given the little information we have.
Sounds like a viable startup opportunity. Especially with the Beyond Meats S-1 post from yesterday where hackers talked about buying meat directly from farmers.
Its the nature of the beast, you invest money to make money, the internet is no different.
This guy has one partner, Incentives are aligned, if I were one to buy onions online, I can see myself still being happy with them in 20 years time. Maybe it cost more, but they don't have a monopoly on Onions, their ability to pass on that cost is limited, which is the major concern, is it not?
That's life in a nutshell, I guess.
I wonder what others think about this quote. Could he not have started the same exact business with another domain? Is owning the "right" domain that important that is should "come first" and be forgotten without it? naively I'd think Google@2019 gives more importance to content then to the domain name. No?
However, I guess it did function as a sort of method of brainstorming business ideas.
Some ideas of the stuff you could sell:
- Kombucha
- Specialty sodas
- Heirloom seeds
- Specialty light bulbs and/or batteries
- Spice packets
- Carpet cleaning powder
- Dice
- Specialty candles
- Prepared origami paper
- Specialty pens/pencils/crayons
- Funky hair accessories (someone recently asked me why there aren't many superhero themed ones because it would be a huge market)
It's fascinating how these small market niches exist but it really is the other 95% that makes them take off.
\s
Thanks for sharing this!
Edit: Looks like they have some competition: https://www.vidaliaonion.org
My brother and I started our company the moment after we bought our domain name: retreat.guru. We actually wanted a different domain but didn’t get it; retreat.guru was the runner up. Then we had a spontaneous 3 hour call where we mapped out the entire global wellness retreat marketplace we would build - all based off the domain name! 5 years later we are still going strong.
We are based out of a small mountain town in B.C. Nowhere near the buzz of Silicon Valley. We gradually took investment and grew from revenue as well. We are very vision driven.
‘I sell ayahuasca retreats on the internet’
:D
These stories are good to tell, sometimes what can help a farmer the most is just someone who can help market and sell their crop.
(They’re real good)
I'm not downplaying what he did - it's really cool - what I'm trying is to get a better sense of the business dynamics here.
I expect you could make the same comment about just about everything on the planet that is grown or made, but then sold by someone else. The original person could try to sell it to consumers, but that would take so much time and effort they wouldn't have time to grow/make the thing in the first place!
Being flashy helps sometimes if your customers are fickle and you need to sell them on something they didn't know they wanted, but if you've got an enthusiast audience or specialized product, substance is all that is required - at least at a fundamental level.
This site provides one very specific thing to a niche market. It's the difference between opening an office supply store vs a site selling one specific type of rubberband.
The costs of shipping is killer.
Can you think of any example where this is not true?
You're now ranked #1 for "vidalia onions" in Google -- but, I'm really curious what the evolution was after buying the domain?
Whole wheat bread, lightly toasted with a smear of mayo and a thick slice of Vidalia. Mmmm... So good.
1. crouch down and reach out your leg gently tapping the "invisible ground"
2. throw a pebble.
3. throw a bunch of sand to see exact available surface area.
i mean.. he's a scientist.Plus if there's "really" an invisible bridge you could throw a pebble at, it should already be covered in dust anyway. Unless the guy who lives in the grail room comes out and sweeps it or something.
that's the point of my rant! :)
I checked using the search box, and it appears this the 12th most voted post of all time (so far!).
Not trying to be a killjoy, but everytime I hear about people reserving domains for fun or future, it just tells of so much privilege. Americans and other Westerners people have already reserved so many domains. Domain name squatting always is a rich-get-richer story.
I’ve bought domains for years. Through that process, I’ve developed a specific routine to evaluate a name prior to purchasing.
I’ve been sketching out a plan to build a web app that largely automates this evaluation process, that I would hope to release as a small side project SaaS in the future.
Anyone here interested in such a thing?
I have done this by hand for a long time, but it's error prone and time consuming. Very straightforward to automate down into a one step process.
I don't really like onions. But real Georgia Vidalias are something special.
https://www.business-opportunities.biz/2013/04/10/the-worlds...
So, you pay for the domain name, list it on the development site, and a developer (say me) can pick and choose from what you have and build a product on your property.
There's a contract, you get x% of proceeds from my endeavor, I get a domain name specific to my needs, and we all benefit. The contract would also specify a dwell-time. I get 12 months, or 2 years, or whatever on the property.
Then the contract comes back up for negotiation. Maybe a sale is negotiated (you want my development, or I want your domain name).
You'd need good contracts - you'd need clauses around trademarks, etc.
This is why I specified renting a redirect, so the developer maintains their IP. I suppose if I (the developer) were to build branding specifically around a domain name (which seems common) then renting could become more of an issue, especially if a new rental agreement cannot be negotiated.
> You'd need good contracts - you'd need clauses around trademarks, etc.
This is the other thing I was pondering. At the start it would essentially be a Craigslist sort of match-making service, and so solid contracts would have to be between individuals without guidance from the service.
Eventually, though, the goal could be to have the company be a registrar in order to control domain names under contract and payment processing (to make sure everyone gets what they agreed to).
I'm not sure the second point above is where a service like this should go, though.
But, I think you're right. There'd be a lot of not-so-desirable domains to sort through.
I copied the quote “take the path to Nothing, and go Nowhere until you reach it.” and got it turned into a canvas to hang above my desk.
They were all good ideas, not duffers, evidenced by subsequent pick up years after.
I just never bothered.
Bother first, domain second! :)
Am I the only one here who has a problem with this kind of "business"? I see it as a very asshole thing to dedicate oneself to.
Law 30: Make your accomplishments seem effortless
How can I possibly be the first person to get stuck on the fact that this fellow dropped $2200 on a niche domain without a business plan in mind?
Most people don't have that kind of whimsy cash, sadly.
My current business and startup take too much time, but some day..
Because I'm a big fan of onions, but an even bigger fan of onion sites...
Just curious, how were the first two farmers you met?
Who would have thought that content marketing would work to sell onions through hacker news!!
Their benefit is that they love local things such as vidalia onions or boiled peanuts that they know are grown locally. I'd wager most of this guy's sales come from the south.
I know quite of young people for whom Google basically is the internet. They never enter addresses in the address bar, and always do a Google search for the site they're trying to get to.
These aren't dullards, either. They're smart people who are talented in their own fields. They're just not techies and the Googling-for-everything workflow works well for them.
For those that are looking to replicate the success of this Vidalia Onion business only have a $10 budget for a domain here are some other options:
onlyvidalias.com
vidalias.net
tryvidalias.com
yummyonions.com
ordervidalias.com
buyvidalias.com
organicvidalias.com
vidaliafarm.com
allvidalias.com
simplyvidalias.com
It's also the perfect combination of the two keywords with nothing else. You'll automatically be at a disadvantage.
But every large market typically has 1 leader and 1-3 other smaller companies who can survive. I doubt this is a large enough market where being #2 or #3 is going to be lucrative. You might as well find other niche premium vegetables. Like 1-800-Flowers and Harry & David (which the author mentioned) does...
https://www.wolfermans.com made a decent-sized business selling premium english muffins.
And someone was running the same business on it just before him: https://web.archive.org/web/19961215000000*/VidaliaOnions.co...
Good strategy. I've seen it suggested to check the wayback machine archive before buying a domain name to make sure you can recreate the same content and backlinks that already exist to take full advantage of any existing SEO.
I looked at doman name historical records and it said it was registered October 2008...which makes sense because that was the year after I graduated college to start my job in Middle Georgia (I'm a software engineer, if anyone knows that area you know who I worked for).
I visited my friend in NYC in September to watch the US Open, so makes sense that it was 2008 that I thought of it.
Late April: Season Begins.
So much of the business stuff we read now is bullshit. It is stupid people getting lucky and riding on VC money while making more stupid decisions but ultimately dumping enough investor money into it that it works enough to get sold.
At which point, that founder then goes around and tells the same stereotypical story of dropping out of college, running out of money and getting investment on the day they were planning on giving up, etc. We have all heard the bullshit before.
So I was genuinely grateful to read a real business story. The owner saw an opportunity, took it when other people probably wouldn't have, and just genuinely worked hard to get where he is.
This is inspiring because anyone here could do it too if they wanted to. I don't mean selling onions specifically, but I mean they could just go out there find a product, work hard towards selling it, team up with manufacturers/producers, etc and make the dream come to life.
Them: We leverage automated machine learning to enhance your existing BI visualizations with more proactive insights
Me: I sell onions on the internet
So good.
Excerpts:
> No one likes schleps, but hackers especially dislike them. Most hackers who start startups wish they could do it by just writing some clever software, putting it on a server somewhere, and watching the money roll in—without ever having to talk to users, or negotiate with other companies, or deal with other people's broken code. Maybe that's possible, but I haven't seen it.
> How do you overcome schlep blindness? Frankly, the most valuable antidote to schlep blindness is probably ignorance. Most successful founders would probably say that if they'd known when they were starting their company about the obstacles they'd have to overcome, they might never have started it. Maybe that's one reason the most successful startups of all so often have young founders.
> Ignorance can't solve everything though. Some ideas so obviously entail alarming schleps that anyone can see them. How do you see ideas like that? The trick I recommend is to take yourself out of the picture. Instead of asking "what problem should I solve?" ask "what problem do I wish someone else would solve for me?" If someone who had to process payments before Stripe had tried asking that, Stripe would have been one of the first things they wished for.
Do you have a source of solid figures to back up that 90%?
About three quarters last more than a year, about half last to 5 years, and about a third last to 10 years.
Does the UK government split into VC backed and not VC-backed? I always thought that number only holds for the "go big or go home" type of business (i.e. VC backed), not for normal ones.
That made me chuckle because I recall walking across the office in 1992, looking at a machine in the corner, and thinking "wow, with this Internet stuff the way it's going I really want to write some clever software, put it on a machine like that and watch my bank account balance grow...".
And it has been fun to watch out that all played out subsequently.
My impression (from way outside, I'm not an entrepreneur at all) is that so much business is VC-funded, which effectively means driven by finance people. Everyone who isn't a VC is still chasing a VC, so VC culture ends up defining business culture.
People, especially left-brained ones like programmers and finance nerds have this really bad tendency to see problems in terms of their preferred solutions. The old "if all you have is a hammer..." thing. So finance people like to turn everything into a money problem that they can solve using spreadsheets and Jupyter notebooks or whatever else it is they use.
Their ideal state is that "business" is just some board game where the money is all on the board already and you're just playing the rules to move it onto your square.
...which is of course completely antithetical to any kind of business that actually matters to real humans. If you want to actually solve a human problem, make peoples' lives better and maybe make a little money in the process, Silicon Valley business culture is increasingly useless to you.
Who are we kidding? Every startup is about making human lives better. /s
http://fortune.com/disrupted-excerpt-hubspot-startup-dan-lyo...
Right. Terms used like "gameplan", "playing to win", etc., confirm it. In fact, although cliches definitely have their place, overuse of terms like that can be considered a "biz smell" (term I just coined - see what I did there? :), analogous to a "code smell" in programming.
Scrappy college kids making a startup don’t know how to live, they’ve just barely lived. And a lot of professionals in tech have no lives outside of work and tech: Wake up and go work in tech. Go home and go read about tech. Attend a party and talk about tech.
How can we expect these Silicon Valley people to create anything that makes life better? All they can do is make cheap permutations of the same tired ideas that have passed through the lips of wanna-be gonna-be entrepreneurs for decades. Ask them: This product makes my life better? Better for what exactly?
Here’s a man who understood that life is a bit better when you can bite into a tasty and juicy Vidalia Onion. This is something you can only know if you stop and take some time to live.
it's popularized on myths like Facebook where the founder actually retained control and got a good deal but that's not the reality and it's not what VC are trying to create.
the reason it's all Scrappy college kids because you need slaves going to work crazy hours and do what they're told but also be crazy and naive enough to believe in it, and low maintenance and confident enough that they can take some direction on their own. and you just need a lot of these people.
because not all of them are going to work well and not all of the ideas are going to pan out but you don't know that and you can afford to fund some of these. you are basically funding an array of experiments and you don't need people who are grown up, in as in mature people who kind of go well I don't think I'm getting a good deal here you need as many bodies as you can. just like the military in war time. and for VCs in their hunger for money for their partners this is like a kind of wartime for them so they're just trying to throw as many bodies as they can at the problem.
all that talk about changing world and saving the world all mythologizing about Facebook etc is to get all those young slaves motivated.
is YC any different? a lot of early writings of Paul Graham on what founders need to know and what makes good startups can be easily read as just propaganda for this sort of program. the bottom line is it's not about what works for founders it's about what works for VCs. and I guess everyone justifies by saying well if vcs get a good outcome then founders do too, but those two Venn diagrams don't necessarily always intersect.
A man approached the salesman upon seeing various colors of different fishing lures being on display. He asked whether those different colors actually work in attracting and catching fishes. The salesman promptly replied "Mister, I'm not selling these to fishes."
If these people are targeting VC money, they don't care if their products actually help solving problems for end consumers (aka the fishes), they just need to know what triggers the VC to invest. Even Masayoshi Son, the head of SoftBank, has lost $130 million in Bitcoin after listening to pitches from those crypto startup CEOs. This is how most businesses fail but hey at least it keeps the money flowing.
Those VC operate based on the principle in which if you throw enough spaghetti onto a wall, even though most will fall off but a few are always bound to stick.
Believe me, nobody knows anything in advance and everything is purely a game of chance, but once somebody gets lucky they can immediately declare themselves as the expert. They start selling books and everyone else would rush out to buy and follow exactly the same steps only to find out most of it just don't work. This same cycle just keeps repeating itself over and over again. Why? The market is not static, it constantly moves and changes around so you are already way behind by the time you apply those same strategies. Plus your personal life and connections are completely different than the other person's so you can't realistically expect the same results.
It's still necessary to learn what has worked because new levels are always built on top of the old ones. But this demonstrates why mathematics, or the rule of randomness, is a universal language that governs everything in our life.
Here's an article that attempts to answer your question, and goes into great detail:
https://www.oregonlive.com/foodday/2012/07/which_sweet_onion...
TLDR: Vidalia is milder. Walla Walla has a more complex flavor profile.
It was a pleasingly refreshing reminder of the old days of the dotcom boom ... a web site for pets! a web site for hotels! a web site for buying onions! anything was possible in those days. Pleasant memories.
Turns out that a website for buying onions was a missed-trick back in those days! (...or was it?)
Great to hear about these business opportunities sprouting up and getting acted on in an honest and decent way.
Good read. Thanks :)
Sounds like my story, where i teamed up with a baker who makes really good cookies. I did all the design and development on nights and weekends. Its only been running for a few months but we've processed almost 1,200 orders delivering cookies. https://cravecookie.co
I love to learn more about this stuff from other engineers. Really inspiring like you said.
At the start of the year, the idea of creating a forum for professionals kept clawing at me, but I couldn't think of a good domain name that wasn't taken. I wanted a .com but I looked at the ones I owned and just went with it weknow.services. A month ago Upwork announced they'd start charging freelancers for "Connects" to send proposals to clients. I started ramping up the campaign as many were asking "Where else can I look" and quickly replied to someone saying I'd been working on this thing, however I was banned from /r/freelance for even citing it.
I'm not banking on the fact that it'll work, but I sincerely hope it does, for my sake and others. It's something that would help me as a freelancer, and I have future plans if things pan out and users find it useful. If anything it's made me realize how hard marketing is.
> Wanna see behind the scenes?
This sent me through a gamut of emotions. First, was some revulsion at how informal it was. Then I chastised myself because it doesn't matter. Then I figured people younger than me (maybe even just at heart...) probably don't mind. And now I just feel like an old curmudgeon. :/
Good job on the site and business though, and good luck.
And everyone out there is about becoming a billion $ or more company... What happened to normal ideas, ideas that can literally feed a few families and make you have a good life as well...
Person behind the article seems to enjoy himself and also seems to be feeding a few farms as well that provide him with onions. Amazing work!
A founder's story (when it's told for PR reasons) will rarely be so messy it's hard to follow, or so clean it lacks drama. The central conflict will usually be foreshadowed in the introduction, rear its ugly head half-way through, then come to a climax at the end of the narrative leaving just enough space for a sales pitch.
Unfortunately, this is predictable. Indignation activates generic responses and, above all, attracts upvotes. It feels great in the short term but leads HN to duller, more obvious places. This pattern is dismayingly reliable. A large part of what we do as HN moderators is to try to counteract it. HN can't live by upvotes alone.
If I compare the relatively low quality of this subthread to the more modest and far more interesting responses that people had to the specific details of the article, the contrast is striking.
I don't mean to pick on you personally! We are all subject to this phenomenon and few of us are very conscious of it in ourselves. There was another example even in this thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19729322. These kinds of subthread grow like weeds. They crowd out the quieter kinds that don't fire up the generic anger that exists in all of us. This effect is collective, not individual; it's a co-creation, and the upvotes probably do more harm than the comments. I am sure you had no intention of feeding it. Unfortunately it happens anyway.
p.s. Perhaps I should add that there's nothing wrong with a critique of VC on HN. HN has hosted countless such critiques. Possibly more have appeared here than anywhere else. The HN community is overwhelmingly (90+%) outside of Silicon Valley, and the majority of it strongly identifies against the VC system (while often feeling itself to be the minority, as if HN overall were of the opposite view).
Rather, the problem is that this was a less interesting direction for the discussion to go, when the actual topic—an onion business!—was much rarer and more curious. What fuels generic tangents is not intellectual curiosity, but a quite different cocktail of emotions. As I said, a large part of moderating HN consists of trying to tease those apart. Trying and mostly failing.
Meanwhile, his closest friends would finish school, go to colleges and universities and they would come back really proud for having a bachelor or masters degree.
One day they met at a crepe shop. He was making his orders along with the other folks that were behind their crepe pans.
"So...you work here mate?"
"Yep."
"Ah...shame. We make very good money, thanks to our degrees. Isn't a sad thing that you are forced to work in this shitty job?"
"First of all, I enjoy doing this job; and second of all, how much are you earning annually, if I may?"
"Around 35K euros".
He burst to hysterical laughter.
"I happen to make the least 1000 euros daily and this 'shitty job' happens to be mine; yep, I own the place. At my highest peak I earned 1 million euros and these guys you see working next to me are my employees which are getting paid more or less the same amount as you."
I happened to be there when this incident took place; it was the best day of my life! ^_^
People of a particular experience level see careers, money, life as a set of prescribed paths for everyone where in life things are far more random and unpredictable.
You spoke the truth.
More than clapping :D The "friends" left completely humiliated.
It's a day that I will cherish for the rest of my life! :D
I've seen it happen. One of my friends felt sorry for another because he was merely a "mechanic" and we had gone through university, but as it turns out he was a Porsche mechanic pulling 68k which was a lot more than what a recent grad international studies intern makes.
"Ah...shame. We make very good money, thanks to our degrees. Isn't a sad thing that you are forced to work in this shitty job?"
https://fs.blog/2014/05/hunter-s-thompson-to-hume-logan/
Seems like a bit of reading that fits, right now.
The story is not that outrageous--Out of the thousands of people on hacker news, it seems likely enough to me that something close to that actually happened to one of them.
I would say that for some, a family centered life and a humble trade could be better than chasing after what I perceive* to be vanity.
* I'm probably mistaken in motivation, but life does present us with choices that are seemingly easy yet are full of hidden costs.
What I know for sure is that my old friend has accomplished more things than our entire classroom as a whole.
I don't care whether people believe the story or not, or whether he actually paid his staff the money he said he had.
All I did was to share with you people his story as I have witnessed it myself.
* The owner of the crepe shop may be 1 in 100,000 with the business acumen, drive & luck to reach the success he had.
* In the long-run, it continues to be beneficial to have a degree [1] since it is nigh impossible to determine whether the business will remain successful for decades.
* The 'degree' kid didn't have to be disrespectful to raise a point and in most cases, people are better off asking more questions before creating a picture of the situation.
* It is difficult to determine whether the 'owner' was actually the owner and whether the salary of the employees were what he said it was. When folks are driven into a corner, they either respond by fight-or-flight.
[1] https://www.bls.gov/careeroutlook/2018/data-on-display/educa...
One million Euro a year gross would imply more or less 3000 Euro a day. Open for 12 hours a day, that's 250 Euro an hour. At 15 Euro a crepe, that's a customer every 4 minutes the whole day. That would be a truly phenomenal success.
And that's gross. If you assume 50% margin on cost (insanely high) and that cost includes the apparently very high employee salaries. Then they need a customer every two minutes for the day. Let's say taxes take half of their net before taxes. they now need a customer every minute for 12 hours every day of the year to hit a million Euro net. All under a series of assumptions that are extremely generous to the firm.
It's hard to imagine that this story, if true, didn't involve an embellishment of scale.
1,000,000 gross in a peak year.
say business is open 290 days of the year.
avg per day = 3448 euro
if average customer order spend is ~15 euro, that's ~230 orders per day that must be made to sustain the 1mm euro gross.
So - if the biz is open 6 hours (optimized around eating times) - that would be ~38 orders/hour.
Key Questions: for the average case : is 38 orders/hour OR 230 orders/day reasonable or not?
for the non-average case: can they make 2x the orders really busy days - i.e. what is the absolute peak orders than can make in a day?
- sausage kiosk average(!) turnover 180.000 € (sausages cost 2-3€, better kiosks make several times that easily)
- small Subway €900k approx.
- average McDonald's €3.2 mil
I'd imagine a decent crepes place the size of a McDonald's in a good location could easily make €2 mil/year turnover and half that much profit in a good year.
When I worked in food service long ago, the managers claimed the goal (of a Subway chain) was 30% gross margin. But that's gross margin, and doesn't account for overhead, and thus is not profit margin.
It works 24/7 with shifts and has delivery that covers the whole city.
To reach that amount, this guy worked his butt off for 3 years non-stop.
- Selling items other than crepes: coffee, tea, alcohol, soft drinks, snacks, etc all have great margins.
- If the place is a cafe, customers may stay and work/read and run a tab, increasing the average revenue per customer.
- Multiple customers may arrive as a group and run up a higher tab.
- Multiple locations: compounding revenue, higher reach, etc
There are probably many more things I'm not even considering.
But your point stands money is made by businesses. For every smart person getting 500k a year salary there’s a business behind that salary with investors making even more.
Oh, and please downvote. Thank you.