42 karma · joined April 25, 2013
> The organisers say the sequence is often picked. But some have alleged a scam and an investigation is under way.
> It is extremely rare for multiple winners to share the jackpot.
that sequence happens, but multiple winners is rare
so the combination of them is the concern here
supply side are a bit better
wrt cost disease
see how milk has remained the same price for decades
AGNB needs some time to grow into longer format
they're literally 3 dudes in an RV without a working toilet
if they had BBC money they would live up to Theroux 100%
and then every task is just a standalone, vertically scalable service on k8s or a giant horizontally scalable compute job
for example, you can finetune gpt-2 to have an idea of sexual biology by having it read erotica. just like how you can have a model learn the same by watching porn. but it is much more efficient to read the text, since there is much less information that is "useless"
it's what Vice tried to capture but failed. parachute journalism works, only if you inject very little of yourself into it and have minimal framework.
this isn't an explicit kill-off, but certainly purposefully offering bad support
- usury
- patents
- copyrights
- land
- software as a service
the first 3 all have some slowly changing socially acceptable period of profit. and they are all enshrined in law. but this means there are also frameworks in place for adjusting this period of profit (lobbying, etc.)
the 4th is only capped by property taxes and sometimes with unintended consequences (cf. prop 13)
the 5th is unregulated and seems socially acceptable to have no definite end date due to a combination of (sometimes artificial) technical difficulty (need for support, e.g. RedHat, any other company based on FOSS) and slow addition of pithy features.
i'm not sure i have any conclusions, but I think this framework is useful because it allows us to examine it with an older moral framework rather than a more (post) modern marxist.
any time passion is involved, you are being paid less than market. cash is a more liquid currency and can in fact buy passion.
people often underestimate their ability to change their own utility functions. If you're watching 4 hours of TV every night (or reading or w/e other "mental recharge" activity) simply change your utility function to let financial planning "recharge you."
The ultimate arb is changing your own utility function.
Obviously this may be harder or easier for some people, but it's a very learnable skill.
it is bounds better than argparse and click. would highly recommend.
important to note here, that a lot of this is thanks to the python team's continued extension of the inspect module.
It seems like Andy writes exactly for movies. Heavy on scene and technicality details, but very, very scant on quality dialogue and character development.
There are many things wrong with short tenures (not that there aren't things wrong with long ones). The main ones include turnover of associated staff who actually know what wheels to grease to get things done. Meanwhile the "figurehead" actual politician has no time to build up political capital with his colleagues.
If you're not a content creator/owner, you're a content consumer. Content is the new rent seeking.
very bold anecdata claim.
I would love to see Shazam numbers as to the actual median frequency per month.
I love this feature on my Pixel 2. I glance at my phone at least 2-3 a day just for this feature. To me it adds another layer of separation from being tied to me phone. Previously pulling up Shazam would bait me into engaging with notifications I didn't need to engage with.
I do agree with the privacy concerns though.
It seems very useful in some fields which require the skills a cover letter shows off and could substitute for a screen or casual interview.
In many technical fields however, requesting cover letters usually suggests to me a lower quality in their hiring process. This undoubtedly bleeds over to my perception of the management, namely more into checking boxes than results.
Most evolutionary theorists think more like physicists and do realize every trait is selectable.