452 karma · joined August 3, 2020
https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/s...
These are more common cancers, and not usually possible to map to a precise cause when they occur.
The GIN index has some similarities to Elasticsearch's inverted indices (last I knew anyway), which also can be quite expensive to write to. If you're doing heavy writes, something to test and consider carefully.
TLDR; writes get a lot more expensive with GIN indices.
Though it can be difficult to download and run random software from the internet, I have to say, most Linux distributions have got the software distribution challenge through their package managers right compared to OSX and Windows. First thing I do on an OSX machine is install homebrew which helps a little.
Most people probably don't need long range peak towing capacity.
Seems like the feature set could be useful to a lot of people, probably most, maybe not for you though.
Many are for tests and don't go to anything. Some go to really important things though, even among the test keys, and this tool tells you that instantly for billions of keys.
I have the Winix 5300 and 5500 purifiers (which I highly recommend), and typically run on mode 3 out of 4 because it pulls about 12 watts (and is quiet) but is not massively different airflow than mode 4 which draws about 70 watts (and is noisy).
Free ranging birds are in less proximity and healthier conditions. There is less contact between them, more sanitary conditions, and healthier birds. But yes, they could have more contact with outside pathogens.
Whereas many poultry barns have thousands of chickens standing in their own excrement, shoulder to shoulder. There are even decaying corpses strewn about and being pecked. Whatever pathogens in there with them could spread and mutate readily, and the birds are likely less healthy and more vulnerable to it.
I'm not sure if there is solid evidence to claim one is more risky than the other, but I think it would be the former.
I created a generic OpenSCAD model for the product, and fed in parameters derrived from more than a dozen data sources to generate a model for every variation. Then, took the 90th percentile by production numbers, and overlaid the models to show the boundaries of the variations as one model. That shape was then used to generate stack-able, vacuum-formed trays to hold the product.
I had a couple of expensive 3D CAD products at my disposal there, but OpenSCAD was the solution I needed to programatically crank out models. That's how my foray into programming started and my career shifted from Manufacturing Engineering to Software. Thanks OpenSCAD team!