158 karma · joined November 4, 2016
Would be nice to keep the ecosystem open.
You can write "I don't want to be writing this" over and over if you like. But it turns out that you usually have good things to say.
What can we learn from them?
Once people taste freedom they tend to not want to give it up, no matter how messy.
I for one cheer on the billionaires trying to extend their lives - it will benefit us all, and remove much disease & suffering from this planet.
And due to advances in agricultural technology, since the Population Bomb book was published, global population has doubled while hunger has greatly diminished.
So wouldn’t the answer be more technology & wealth, not less?
Where should I go for geeky insight into it?
It's not that their privacy-centric approach was wrong (although this article details its major shortcomings), but the suppression of trial & error definitely was wrong.
Compounding this was Google-Apple's insistence that only government bodies can release exposure notification apps and you have a total absence of real innovation. It's no surprise that nothing has succeeded.
The whole debacle is a case study in the effect of gatekeepers on innovation. As manual contract tracing teams here in the US become overwhelmed, how many lives could have been saved by a successful exposure notification app?
The lack of error correction in the ability to replace bad leaders and freedom of speech isn't just a cultural preference: https://www.economist.com/democracy-in-america/2016/01/31/fr...
I believe Yuval Noah writes mostly about pre-agricultural life, not pre-industrial life.
So I ask HN, why has this narrative become so widespread?
Zoom doesn't seem to have much of a moat, right? Most users aren't even logged in.
Without energy there is no space-time. Space-time could be thought of simply as information about the energy that it emanates from.
Apologies for the tangent from this amateur. But it seemed similar to your thoughts.
https://www.politico.eu/article/josep-borrell-chinas-move-in...