Many tests, drugs and treatments have been applied in the name of defensive medicine.
91 karma · joined October 18, 2011
Many tests, drugs and treatments have been applied in the name of defensive medicine.
I spend most of my time working on FPGAs, and I would imagine that in the end, a practical implementation of this chip would involve a good deal of similar work. Data would have to be piped from one core to adjacent cores, to keep the inter-chip bandwidth tractable. This could result in portions on the edges left unused because the data can't get there.
In summary, the applications for such a chip are limited, and will require a different skillset from what we usually ascribe to a programmer, but in those constraints these chips could be incredibly high-performance.
EDIT: I haven't played with log-scale arithmetic yet, but I think that adds / subs will be much more computationally complex--probably more so than multiplies in the current linear-scale numbers. Just a thought.
In my defense, I was not saying "since we achieved all these awesome things, we'll surely eventually avoid the heat death of the universe". Instead, I was claiming that right now, we're probably still to ignorant to know that with confidence. Perhaps we will find a way to escape into a different universe.
Thanks for the reminder (and good username!)
"travelling faster than 40 miles an hour is impossible" "communicate with someone on the other side of the world instantly? Impossible!" "fly to the moon?" "end death?"
I'm sure that if we sat down, we could come up with thirty things that we have daily today, but were 'impossible' a hundred years ago.
IMHO, humanity's goal for the next hundred years is to enhance our energy and medical technologies as quickly as possible. (space takes a distant third).
We are essentially in a race against time: if we are too slow, we will deplete our resources and wipe ourselves out.
There are lots and lots of things that are worth a single human's life (or tens, hundreds of lives). Research is one of them. For instance, if we could magically trade a random 100 lives for knowing if there is extraterrestrial life, I believe that it's a worthy trade. That's just one example.
Naturally, you have many interests. We all do. Google is trying to get the best picture of what those interests are, arguably so that they can give better than chance (or whatever they had before this). As usual, I would suspect that having more information trumps having less, so I argue that SPYW is improvement.
Sorry if this post seems impolite...
I only see one major box categorized as "engineer", and it says that 1/4 of all engineers are architecture or surveying. Try 1/20, perhaps. 1/4 is way too large. The only engineering majors that large are EECS and Mechanical, I bet.
Engineering and software development are fields where you can consistently make very respectable wages. Risk aversion is a factor, after all...
I can imagine that you could rig your cell phone (or another device) to transmit at high power to jam the connection, but the FCC would have something to say about it. If you're caught, I'd expect civil and criminal reprisals...
Pretty much all cellular communications nowadays uses CDMA of one flavor or another. An important property of CDMA is that any signal that I send to the tower actually causes more noise for the other users in the network. This id called being interference limited. For this reason, there is a ton of effort going into power control, so that reach user sends just enough power to reach the tower but not more. Your cell phone COULD boost it's transmit power to reach the tower, but it would ruin everyone else's connection.
But then again, they threw down millions per unit for those back-scatter machines, so all bets are off.....
The threat is that some day, the other companies will support a law which is beneficial to them (and bad for you). Systemically, it is best for us to cooperate to achieve a group maximum
But seriously, are there any other awesome news aggregates that I should be aware of?
I am not am expert.
I was being VERY optimistic. The system I just described would be roughly modelling the free market system, which education is not. Wholesale governmental support of the present system will make it much more "resilient" than it should be.
The good news is that the internet works in our favor--we already have alternative tools which mitigate the lack of good schools. I'm talking about Khan Academy and MIT OpenCourseWare, of course.