863 karma · joined December 28, 2011
This can now be mitigated thanks to Referrer Policy [0]:
"The simplest policy is No Referrer, which specifies that no referrer information is to be sent along with requests made from a particular settings object to any origin. The header will be omitted entirely."
Voilà:
<meta name="referrer" content="no-referrer">
It's a W3C draft, but it's supported by latest FF/Chrome/Safari, and Microsoft Edge [1], although currently, with Edge, you'll want to use the legacy keyword "never" instead. (AFAIK "never" works with all the aforementioned browsers.)> Google analytics junkies in particular will have to weigh whether they feel their users privacy is more important to them than their ability to analyze their users movements on the site.
There's a nice alternative - Piwik [2]. It's very much like GA, but GPL and self-hosted, and with various options for privacy [3]. You can even use it without cookies, if you don't mind the somewhat reduced accuracy and functionality.
Regarding fonts from Google Fonts, it's super-easy to host them yourself. There's a nice bash script [4] that downloads the font you want in all its formats/weights and generates the proper CSS. There's also the google-webfonts-helper service [5], and Font Squirrel has a webfont generator [6].
[0] https://w3c.github.io/webappsec/specs/referrer-policy/
[1] https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn904194%28v=vs.85%...
[3] https://piwik.org/docs/privacy/
[4] https://github.com/neverpanic/google-font-download
[0] https://github.com/WhisperSystems/TextSecure/commits/master
Here's a funny one: in France, the Eiffel Tower copyright has expired; however, courts have deemed that the lighting display on the tower is a protected work, still copyrighted. Meaning you are allowed to publish pictures of the Eiffel Tower taken at day, but not at night -- unless you have permission. [1]
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_panorama#European_U...
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eiffel_Tower#Image_copyright_c...
That's what they're doing. From the second paragraph: "We will also use HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)"
[0] http://www.theguardian.com/music/2014/nov/17/steve-albini-at...
[1] http://www.theguardian.com/music/2014/nov/17/steve-albinis-k...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:United_States_extradition_...
> His death doesn't mean running is a bad idea - a single anecdote is statistically insignificant - but perhaps it can remind us that nothing we do can guarantee a long and healthy life.
Or one could see it this way: His father had a heart attack at 35 and died of another heart attack at 42. Jim Fixx, who had a genetic condition, was a heavy smoker until age 36, etc., might very well have bought himself an extra ten years or so.
Having used a Windows Phone for some time before switching back to Android, the HERE maps app was the one thing I missed the most. Offline support is a must for me and Google Maps' offline 'support' is a joke. (I'm currently in Paris, without mobile Internet access. Google Maps is useless as soon as I leave the house.) OsmAnd/Maps.me do offline properly, but their UIs are lacking and both have serious GPS issues on my Nexus 5.
HERE just works great. There are many lovely little features.
Like, if I click on a subway station nearby, Google Maps (Lollipop) will show me the name of the station and how long it takes to get there, and if I swipe up it will also tell me the lines going from that station and show some share/depart buttons and street photos.
If I click on the same station in HERE, it will overlay the routes of the station's subway lines on the map so that I can at once actually see where they are going. Incredibly more useful, especially in big cities like Paris or Berlin where there can be a dozen subway lines or more.
I wonder if small features like these and the whole offline thing reflect where the developers come from? It seems like the Google Maps team doesn't take public transport very seriously, and that they can't imagine people ever being without Internet access.
For some values of "best". :) It's certainly the most iconic. Certainly not the most convenient, what with the cumbersome film loading (three-hand procedure) and the terrible film rewind (uncomfortable, slow knob instead of the M4+ rewind lever). And framelines only for 50mm and longer.
Last for decades? Perhaps. Watch out for finder separation and other fun issues. Hope that there are still capable Leica repair technicians around in 30 years. They are a dying breed.
I miss mine, though. Jungle wisdom says you should never sell a Leica, because you're only going to buy another one for more money later anyway.
> the only option for photographers who want good quality film cameras is to buy them on Ebay
There are still options if you want to buy new, like Cosina Voigtländer's Bessa R2M/R3M/R4M. Leicas they ain't, but they are of good quality and in many ways functionally superior. And I much prefer the R3M/R3A 1x finder to any Leica finder.
The pro camera of all 35mm pro cameras, the Nikon F6, is still in production. In 2012 they were making about 50 per month. Reportedly handled by two (2) people in Sendai!
Nikon FM10 (actually produced by Cosina) is also still being made. Vivitar still makes a similar SLR. I believe Fujifilm is still producing one or a couple of their premium compacts.
More worrisome is the availability of film in the future, although this Kickstarter does get my hopes up: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/filmferrania/100-more-y...
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veblen_good
[2] http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/20/fashion/leica-cameras-favo...
Lightroom felt too sluggish and I didn't even bother trying Premiere, but at least having Photoshop available kept rebooting to Windows to a minimum.
"Many years later, as he faced the firing squad, Colonel Aureliano Buendía was to remember that distant afternoon when his father took him to discover ice."
I don't want to deal with 2-step authentication on devices I trust (e.g., my encrypted laptop). I could switch it on and off every now and then, but with Google I'd always be typing my normal password (for me, generated by KeePassX and impossible to memorize) when doing the 2-step thing, right?
You choose a "base password" (different from your master password) and it then generates 100 one-time passwords that you can print out and put in your wallet. So to login, the password you enter is "<base password><one-time password>". Works great. You can also make it restricted so that one-time logins can't delete anything, or change any options.