399 karma · joined March 2, 2008
"TeuxDeux is the to-do app I've been looking for my whole life, and I've been looking!"
"TeuxDeux is like google cal's & google task's better-looking and far more fun sister."
"We haven't got enough limos in the country to fulfil the demand," she says. "We're having to drive them in hundreds of miles from Germany and Sweden."
And the total number of electric cars or hybrids among that number? "Five," says Ms Jorgensen. "The government has some alternative fuel cars but the rest will be petrol or diesel. We don't have any hybrids in Denmark, unfortunately, due to the extreme taxes on those cars. It makes no sense at all, but it's very Danish."
The airport says it is expecting up to 140 extra private jets during the peak period alone, so far over its capacity that the planes will have to fly off to regional airports--or to Sweden--to park, returning to Copenhagen to pick up their VIP passengers.
Other possibly-relevant factors:
Logistics of delivery in the US are, on average, much simpler; both UPS and FedEx are superlative (and Amazon uses such private carriers exclusively in much of the US), and there are good contract-delivery options for heavier and bulkier objects. Delivery locations (both residences and offices) are mostly accessible, being on average much newer. It's common for customers to take delivery at workplaces, and use their cars to take objects home.
By contrast, in the UK all the logistics companies are marginal performers, partly because the government's subsidized Royal Mail continues to command some usage. Much of the housing stock is vastly older and less easily accessible than in the US; heavy and oversize deliveries are often very much a matter of engineering custom solutions. Homes and offices can be far apart, and the customers often commute between by train, so there's no convenient auto to carry things home that were delivered to the office.
All these considerations may have contributed to the model of ordering over the web and picking up from a physical location. This model has been very rare in the U.S., but is not so uncommon in the U.K.
Aspen Global Change Institute website, http://www.agci.org/programs/past_workshop_participants/abou...
"By now everyone has heard of what has come to be known as ClimateGate, which was and is an international scientific fraud, the worst any of us have seen in our cumulative 223 years of APS membership. For those who have missed the news we recommend the excellent summary article by Richard Lindzen in the November 30 edition of the Wall Street journal, entitled 'The Climate Science isn’t Settled,' for a balanced account of the situation. It was written by a scientist of unquestioned authority and integrity. ..."
"The principals in this escapade have not denied what they did, but have sought to dismiss it by saying that it is normal practice among scientists. You know and we know that that is simply untrue. Physicists are not expected to cheat."
http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2009/12/gold-an...
"If gold will eventually be remonetized, gold is insanely cheap. If gold will never be remonetized, gold is insanely expensive. It's one or the other. Therefore, if you guess right about this question, you will make huge profits, and if you guess wrong take huge losses."
"The reason I still expect gold remonetization to happen - in the long term, not tomorrow! - is that there's simply no other viable alternative. Everyone knows that the global economy needs a new currency. Most can see that the dollar cannot be saved or replaced by any other sovereign currency or basket thereof - because no central bank could tolerate the economic effects of the upward revaluation that would result if its currency replaced the dollar in C[entral] B[ank] portfolios"
"MIT’s Richard Lindzen is one of the world’s leading climate scientists. He is also a climate 'skeptic,' rejecting claims that anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases are likely to create a climate catastrophe. Above all others, he is the climate skeptic environmental activists most fear, as he has unimpeachable credentials. As a prominent climate scientist who believes global warming could cause an environmental catastrophe confided to me, Dr. Lindzen’s views are not easily dismissed, even if his views are somewhat outside the 'mainstream' of climate science. (Of course, we may have to reconsider what constitutes 'mainstream' climate science after the leak of e-mails and other documents from the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit.)"
http://volokh.com/2009/12/01/mits-lindzen-on-climategate/I was amazed to discover that I was consistently choosing the blind results from Yahoo! as best for my own searches.
Think of how difficult the New Yorker's fact checking was before the web! The process of fact-checking goes back to the early days of the New Yorker under editor Harold Ross. James Thurber wrote (in "The Years With Ross") of "Ross's later intense dedication to precision. He studied the New York Telephone Company's system of verifying names and numbers in its directories ... He found out about the Saturday Evening Post's checking department, which he said consisted of seven women who checked in turn every fact, name, and date. ... His checking department became famous, in the trade, for a precision that sometimes leaned over backward. ... Ross's checkers once informed Mencken that he couldn't have eaten dinner at a certain European restaurant he had mentioned in one of his New Yorker articles, because there wasn't any restaurant at the address he had given. Mencken brought home a menu with him to prove that he was right, but he was pleased rather than annoyed. 'Ross has the most astute goons of any editor in the country,' he said."
A FAQ about the organization with copy of its constitution is online:
http://www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk/Display.aspx?MasterId=...
"San Francisco boasts superb weather. ... There may be some fog, or a bit of rain from time to time, but most of the time it’s sunny and hovering around the high 60s to lower 70s."
and a closely-related bad point:
"the sight of homeless persons in varying states of dishevelment".
If you're homeless, being so in a spot where it's nearly always comfortable to be outside is perfectly sensible. It's not surprising that there are fewer homeless people in areas where it snows and freezes.
His link to http://emptyage.honan.net/mth/2009/07/are-you-going-to-san-f... is well worth following, particularly for the good advice:
"If you're moving 3,000 (or even 300) miles to live in San Francisco; live in San Francisco. And by I don't simply mean that you should not live in the East Bay or the Peninsula or Marin. I mean live in a part of the city that your great-grandparents would recognize as being San Francisco. Somewhere that was entirely residential, and all of the homes in your neighborhood existed, prior to 1915."
The old neighborhoods of San Francisco are wonderful, with considerable village character, nothing like living in SOMA or the Tenderloin.
365 * 16 = 5840 hrs/year, 5840 * 2.5 pence = GBP 146.00
(BBC Licence Fee 2009 is GBP 142.50)
"Let's start with a bang: don't keep a schedule.
"He's crazy, you say!
"I'm totally serious. If you pull it off -- and in many structured jobs, you simply can't -- this simple tip alone can make a huge difference in productivity.
"By not keeping a schedule, I mean: refuse to commit to meetings, appointments, or activities at any set time in any future day.
"As a result, you can always work on whatever is most important or most interesting, at any time.
"Want to spend all day writing a research report? Do it!
"Want to spend all day coding? Do it!
"Want to spend all day at the cafe down the street reading a book on personal productivity? Do it!
"When someone emails or calls to say, "Let's meet on Tuesday at 3", the appropriate response is: "I'm not keeping a schedule for 2007, so I can't commit to that, but give me a call on Tuesday at 2:45 and if I'm available, I'll meet with you."
"Or, if it's important, say, "You know what, let's meet right now."
"Clearly this only works if you can get away with it. If you have a structured job, a structured job environment, or you're a CEO, it will be hard to pull off.
"But if you can do it, it's really liberating, and will lead to far higher productivity than almost any other tactic you can try."