This depends very much on who you're talking about.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ana-davila/drug-cartels-where-...
1,154 karma · joined December 9, 2010
This depends very much on who you're talking about.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ana-davila/drug-cartels-where-...
I think there's also value in defining what people mean by 'small time dealer' in this context. To me, that connotes someone selling a bit of pot to their friends so they can smoke for free or something. People who ship misc. substances internationally and in some cases earn six figures plus annually don't fit that definition in my eyes.
https://techcrunch.com/2017/07/12/soundshroud/
> Instead, sources at SoundCloud tell TechCrunch that founders Alex Ljung and Eric Wahlforss confessed the layoffs only saved the company enough money to have runway “until Q4” — which begins in just 50 days.
> A core question from staff during the all-hands was why there wasn’t transparency into the finances or a strict hiring freeze. The message from management was that a hiring freeze would show weakness and lead to people asking questions. That wasn’t satisfying when the company ended up shedding almost half its staff.
> In the final chapter, Alex finds himself halfheartedly preparing for yet another night of crime with a new gang (Lenn, Rick, Bully). After a chance encounter with Pete, who has reformed and married, Alex finds himself taking less and less pleasure in acts of senseless violence. He begins contemplating giving up crime himself to become a productive member of society and start a family of his own, while reflecting on the notion that his own children will be just as destructive as he has been, if not more so.
Broadly speaking, the whole sentiment makes me uneasy, especially given how powerful a tool the internet can be for consensus building.
> "entire social support" systems, which I might add seem to be coming up short in the first place.
I doubt very much you'd make the same statement about the urban poor.
For people on the low end of the earning spectrum, the lack of tangible benefits for moving outside of a vague promise of better job prospects makes staying put a viable option. If you worked at McDonalds, would you move across the country and away from your entire social support system for a chance to commute two hours on public transit to work at Arbys? I wouldn't.
There just aren't any houses, so their quality of life takes a greater hit than staying put in the form of huge commutes and dramatically increased cost of living. See service workers or teachers in San Francisco.
1. https://www.curbed.com/2017/6/20/15834514/rent-transportatio...
2. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/607957/the-unaffordable-u...
3. http://www.sfexaminer.com/mayor-lee-spend-44-million-sf-teac...
Does that make tech employment in general the research arm of the ruling class trying to take away whatever privacy we have left?
> ...culture clash seems to me to be more common in technology companies doing hardware projects than in hardware companies adding software to their processes.
It's good to see someone doing more than just talk about this sort of thing; both the employment aspect and the culture clash side of it. Compare that to say, how Google treats its ex-military drone contractors [1].
1. http://www.businessinsider.com/ex-military-contractor-google...
edit: hn thread from the time: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11138086
For me personally, I watched twitch pretty regularly when Starcraft 2 was popular, to learn tips and tricks from players better than myself. It was more akin to watching game film than entertainment content to me.
Attempting to force teams to bench their best players for injury prevention / adding games to the schedule that will be played by the bench players will also lower the quality of pro games, and turn off even more fans to the NFL - which is already not doing great.