My thoughts about software engineering evangelism best practices
It is mostly about stuff like SOLID having 10s of interpretations and confusing principles that require years of xp to make sense (you realize that they're just poorly written)
12 karma · joined November 1, 2023
It is mostly about stuff like SOLID having 10s of interpretations and confusing principles that require years of xp to make sense (you realize that they're just poorly written)
it's just backup of current state with irrelevant commit message. Everything is described at the end of the work in PR's description and squash merged.
While git is good under the hood, then it has not really user-friendly interface.
Also git heavily benefits from GitHub's success, which locks us with git :(
I wrote about it here https://trolololo.xyz/github - GitHub is really good, but there's a small problem with that
I've recently wrote a post about it - how we're kinda locked with git and how other solutions have it hard to get adoption.
git was good, but github cemented git's position. So unless GitHub allows other solutions, then we're kinda locked.
>So what's the issue here? I'm worried that just because GitHub is so good, then unless they decouple from git as letters management engine and allow any/other, then we will be locked with git.
Hah, I've recently wrote a post about similar issue - why we may be locked with git.
>So what's the issue here? I'm worried that just because GitHub is so good, then unless they decouple from git as letters management engine and allow any/other, then we will be locked with git.