You’re welcome.
637 karma · joined December 17, 2018
You’re welcome.
You’re welcome.
You’re welcome.
With that said, I have always done my research and managed to obtain vehicles which, after maybe some high-importance fixes in the beginning, managed to last another 5-20 years without any other major work done to them.
Hell, aside from oil changes and minor fixes that I did entirely by myself, I got my last car for nearly free and it lasted me a good decade before some idiot with a jacked-up pickup - he couldn’t even see me behind him - backed into me even though I was laying on the horn like crazy.
Besides, anything prior to 2006 is going to be much easier to fix, does not have DRM, and will not spy on you unless it comes with OnStar.
Honestly, the biggest pain point these days is the lack of a true manual clutch, with the full three pedals on the floor. These vehicles are becoming distressingly rare.
Unfortunately we are hurtling into a future where 80+% live lives of grinding poverty with no real viable future to hope for, while another 19% have actual options and resources, and that final 1% exist in unimaginable opulence and wealth that is built entirely upon the labour of the other 99%. As in, true parasites in every economic way.
“Why are we doing this again?” Is essentially “why are we doing this action a second time?”.
“Why are we doing this, again?” Is essentially “please repeat/re-state the reasoning for this path of action”.
A simple comma, but a significant difference.
Luckily I’m awake at the time, relaxed in a sitting position, and have no problem starting back up. I just get “petered out” on an exhale with my trachea fully open and unblocked, just no burning need to inhale at the moment.
Plus, I usually hit a mild panic at the 30-45s point, and force myself to inhale again.
And no, I don’t get sleep apnea. My GP has checked.
Make a graph with two axes.
Vertical is longevity. Throw-away apps at the bottom, software meant to last decades at the top.
Horizontal is how critical the software is. Ad-hoc or experimental or trivial stuff near the origin, financial, medical, or other important software that must never make a mistake to the far right.
AI can sit in the lower left. It is meant to do stuff in the lower left. Let it go nuts there, and have fun with it.
But AI cannot be allowed to touch the top right corner. Up there is the region of destroyed lives if something goes wrong. Sure, rubber-ducky things with AI, let it read the code in that corner, let it suggest optimal structures for you to build. But never let it touch code that’s sitting there.
As for the other two quadrants… “it depends” on your appetite for risk, of AI going so badly off-script that the company is destroyed trying to untangle that hairball. YMMV.
Now if only they could make a senior’s device like this, geared to cheap price and low specs for large font sizes on a wide device with full traditional phone capabilities. Both my parents could use one, they just won’t at a premium price point.
Either it’ll flop so hard that there will be no second gen, or a lot of issues will be corrected in that second gen.
And that includes humans.
At that point, we’re looking at our global population free-fall cratering into the 1-2B range over 1-3 decades, at best. Worst-case is under 500M, with a full reversion back to the Bronze Age or earlier. And a continuing persistent (slower) decline down to a big fat zero.
Not any time within the last decade, I hope. Because that’s borderline gross incompetence.
Now granted, it’s in-app Safari for the iOS Hack app, but still. Not great.
While I would rather see a space elevator bringing most of humanity to offworld arcologies where we can flourish without poisoning ecosystems, we desperately need to get our on-planet population beneath 1B, and preferably beneath 500M.
And projections via the World3/2024 model show us dropping beneath 4B quite rapidly after civilization collapses in the 2040s, and suggesting a significantly non-zero probability of humanity being extinct by 2200. So we’ll get there without tech, just not in the most ideal manner.
If there is any chance, you should definitely get the vaccine when you hit 50. Earlier, if there is a risk of early-onset dementia.
My collection at the time was just shy of 3,000 entries. In the decade since, backups of the DB have more than doubled in size, so I know it’s grown appreciably.
What makes my collection an issue is that I collect hardcovers almost exclusively, not only for the larger print size and ease of handling, but also because hardcovers are more shelf stable. Let’s just say that I am planning to have stacks on rails - I think it’s called high density mobile shelving - in the basement, where a concrete foundation ought to be enough of a support.
Almost everyone who has never been poor has no clue how violent poverty is.
Anyone who is not an insider is a loser.
And certain AI have been demonstrated to play spontaneously, albeit in limited ways.
On the flip side, only sapients demonstrate sufficient curiosity to ask questions. We’re asking questions as soon as we’re old enough to string words together, but in all the sign language experiments we have ever done, no great ape other than humans have ever asked a question.
AI has never demonstrated the curiosity that drives spontaneous question-asking.
And I think that this critical limitation - a lack of curiosity - is why current AI will never be able to exceed human creativity.
It can ape it, certainly, but it’s just the ultimate note-cribber. It imitates, it pattern-matches. It’s not actually being creative.
And that’s kind of sad.
For the first time ever I am frightened more by the company than by the AI.
Up until now I only saw the company as gangs of madmen looking to herd cats. Now it’s clear that they are less sane than their wildly hallucinating products.
I mean, sucks to be those people. But I say let them have the day they voted for.
As another commenter has said: it’s not if, it’s when.