http://contribute.jquery.org/style-guide/js/
> Indentation with tabs.
127 karma · joined September 20, 2011
http://contribute.jquery.org/style-guide/js/
> Indentation with tabs.
Scrollkit took just one aspect of that (frontend development) and stated "The NYT spent hundreds of hours hand-coding ‘Snow Fall.’ We made a replica in an hour."
Its outright dishonest, and devalues the great effort that others spent on it. I can understand why they are pissed.
Henges have a ditch with an outer bank. At Stonehenge it is reversed, with a ditch OUTSIDE the bank - effectively making the world around it the structure for which it is named.
http://BO/ has address 166.114.1.28
http://CM/ has address 195.24.205.60
http://DK/ has address 193.163.102.24
http://GG/ has address 87.117.196.80
http://JE/ has address 87.117.196.80
http://KH/ has address 203.223.32.21
http://PN/ has address 80.68.93.100
http://TK/ has address 217.119.57.22
http://TO/ has address 216.74.32.107
http://UZ/ has address 91.212.89.8
http://VI/ has address 193.0.0.198
http://WS/ has address 64.70.19.33
I havent received a reply yet to my request to reopen the public discussion on the new gTLDs: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5351335. I'll be chasing up on it today - I would appeal to the rest of you to do the same and help stop these gTLDs ever seeing the light of day.
The most important thing to get out of the meeting, IMHO, is challenges, as status should be evident by the location of your story tickets. The problem with providing an environment where "Others can skim-read or ignore." is that they often will, and peer challenges can easily go unresolved without adequate feedback.
You are standing for a reason - its uncomfortable (for those of us who sit all day). Your facilitator should be roping in the conversation (and if not you need to replace them - rotating among team members often works). If that doesn't work, then your teams are likely too large.
Please see parent and other posts in the thread, comments on the linked article, and discussions in the forums for others.
All these new domains can possibly achieve, IMHO, is to confuse the consumer and allow corporations to control access to 'desirable' gTLDs.
If the domain space is so overcrowded, then by all means introduce a new gTLD - but keep it ICANN controlled. Either run a poll to choose, or allow the corporations to 'sponsor' their choice of TLDs incorporation into ICANN - but there is no way they should be commercially controlled!
UPDATE: Im really upset that I missed this - looks like ICANN opened up a discussion for public comment (which has now closed after only a month? Surely such a major change should be open to larger public debate..): http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/closed-generic-0...
UPDATE2: I have sent an email to karen.lentz@icann.org requesting that the discussion be reopened. I believe it is our duty as a community to publicise this discussion amongst web professionals and have a further chance to fight it. I would respectfully request that you do the same!
I believe this is the point of the demonstration.
>$70k/m bandwidth bill! (using a conservative 6c/GB rate..)
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1196577471303.7KB+in+GB...