HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

reduxredacted

453 karma · joined March 3, 2009

submissionscomments
reduxredacted··on Homeless Man Has Three Degrees and Can't Find a Job
As crappy as that might have been what would have happened had his mom still been alive?

You are completely right when you're in the position to think rationally. My only thought is that ... it's his Mom. I'm a married man with a few kids and am the sole income provider for my family (by choice not circumstance). I would move heaven and earth to ensure my family (my bride and children) were taken care of. Were I single, I'd live on the street if it meant the difference between my mom being tossed out of her home or me being able to prevent that.

It's completely irrational behavior from a Dave Ramsey standpoint (I'm a fan of his), and I know that elderly care isn't a choice between "stay in your home" and "suffer/die in an alley with dementia", but it's difficult to make sound decisions when dealing with such a serious emotional circumstances. (case in point, I don't even know the meaning of living on the street, but I know what decision I'd make regardless).

There's a bit of hindsight at play here. When I decided to move out, my dad did everything he could to convince me to buy a house rather than rent (throwing your money away! Tax deductions!). From a cash flow perspective, it didn't make sense. I had no savings and would have had to game the system via several different types of loans, but from the conventional wisdom of the time, it was: your house will never decline in value. I rented and I'm glad I did. I'm now a homeowner with a simple 15 year fixed that's nearly paid off.

reduxredacted··on Homeless Man Has Three Degrees and Can't Find a Job
Having managed (paid) interns and full time employees picked right out of graduation (I'm in a somewhat experimental role and that means the only staff I'm going to get is junior level), I can't possibly restate the importance of not delaying entry into doing something meaningful in life, if I take your meaningful to mean advancing your experience in your desired field.

The best employee I've ever had wasn't a Computer Science or MIS major (I believe he switched later). It was an accident that I even got his resume (coincidentally, a staffing intern at my company mixed it up. It was due for the bin [HR and staffing are for another rant, I'll leave it alone this time]). He was a brilliant guy. He interned for the half of the summer. In a few weeks he went from zero experience with databases and directX, to developing a solution using both technologies (he wasn't a magician, the end-product was good, but required some reworking of code due to his applying knowledge from one language to another, but it was done, usable and with a bit of work supportable). We offered him a full time position on the spot and he declined (he wanted to be in academia at the time, but ended up in industry a few years later).

Degrees are important. Experience is important. Intelligence is important, but being intelligent and having degrees doesn't equate to success or the deserving of success. I used to work with a guy who was the sort of guy you wanted to go out to lunch with (if you're a geek). Very intelligent, had all sorts of ideas, could talk about anything related to his field (networking) and would challenge you to think about things differently. Unfortunately, he could talk all around theory, but he couldn't execute. It was a strange sort of inability to choose between several equally good approaches to solving a problem. Every project he worked on got about 3/4 to completion and then fell flat into failure.

And of course, the story of my two coworkers is certainly not a rigorous statistical understanding of the world. It's my observation mixed with bias. But it's worked so far in finding good, terribly unqualified individuals that can produce far more than they take away from me in time-spend.

reduxredacted··on 10 people who don't matter (2006)
Thanks.

I picked up a nasty bit of malware from an imbedded advertising on cnn.com and have since not only blocked them via adblock+, but I mark them as untrusted in NoScript. As a result, none of the links worked.

I will say, it's almost impressive that CmdrTaco (Rob Malda) ended up as #6. Having been unable to read the article the list almost implies people who have had serious influence in the past. I'd be honored to be on it (especially if, in 2006, I was named Mark Zuckerberg).

edit: clarify the advertising problem. It wasn't a link.

reduxredacted··on Ask HN: Is there a desktop audio player that lets me delete files at source?
Media Monkey does this. It's free version is more than good enough.
reduxredacted··on "SQLite is not designed to replace Oracle. It is designed to replace fopen()."
Good point. I was going for SQL-Lite. But being wrong (and hearing enough people say "lie-nux" [and to be clear, I am not mocking ... we read things and form our own pronunciation because we often don't hear them said] ...) I decided to google it.

This isn't necessarily authoritative or well researched, but it appears that S-Q-L-Lite is correct: http://blog.cleverly.com/permalinks/247.html

reduxredacted··on "SQLite is not designed to replace Oracle. It is designed to replace fopen()."
By the use of "an", I learned that I have been pronouncing SQLite wrong. The maintainers clearly prefer the spelling out of SQL in the title.

I've always been on the "sequel" side of pronouncing SQL (hey, it's no worse than "scuzzy" for SCSI), which morphed SQLite into "Sequelite". I never realized how bizarre that sounded (almost more like a material than a database).

reduxredacted··on Rebuttal: LulzSec Ups The Ante
It's an interesting point that you make, but I think the analogy is generally flawed for most people.

Most people don't carry around a significant amount of personal information of others (I have an electronic address book, but I don't have my friend's credit card/banking/social security numbers).

This rings rather personally to me, and I do consider it an absolutely jerk move. Of course, being irresponsible with other peoples' information is also a jerk move. In 1999, an HR rep copied into Excel the entire contents of the employee database (something he knew was not acceptable practice). A disgruntled support tech discovered this while rummaging through his computer and posted all of that data on a public, searchable web site. At the time (and this may still be the case) it was not illegal to post the information that he did, which included social security numbers, mother's maiden names, birthdays and a bunch of other details. It took a few years to get the site properly shut down, to catch the guy, and to prosecute him for the theft of the data. It's been a fun decade closely monitoring and correcting my credit reports.

reduxredacted··on Supreme Court upends Bayh-Dole: Serious ding to University patent ownership?
Sorry for the sparse link ... I couldn't find a better source this early.
reduxredacted··on US debt visualized
It provides no information other than "big number is big, lol."

As an accurate, useful comparison it falls short, and there's a political agenda behind it (I hate politics, yet I'm commenting). But people don't regularly wrap their brain around how big a trillion really is. Had the site used sticks, marbles, pebbles or even an illustration related to time, it would have been useful. I remember as a child being taught the difference between a million and a billion in that manner and it was important to my relative understanding of numbers. Most people don't work with big numbers all day and could gain something from just that simple point ... big numbers are big.

It's dishonest, though, and reminds me of why I hate politics. At university, I had a philosophy professor who argued injustice by comparing the percentage of African-Americans on death row vs. other nations of origin, to the percentage of the African-Americans in the US population vs. other nations of origin. He provided those two numbers and much of the class was shocked. The problem is that the US doesn't pick random citizens to be on death row, it picks citizens who are convicted of capital crimes. A more honest comparison (and, still yet, illustrative of the point, though less dramatic) would be to compare the number of African-Americans convicted of a capital crime and sentenced to death with the same rates of other minority groups (or even against everyone else as a whole would be an improvement), and then, of course, diving into conviction rates, reasonably provable false conviction rates and the host of other variables that enter into an imperfect system that is imperfect because human beings are imperfect.

EDIT: Improper use of asterisks. Tsk Tsk. Corrected my description of the professor's comparison by adding "vs. other nations of origin" since that's more accurate.

reduxredacted··on Why I will never pursue cheating again
It hurts me to have to disagree with you because you invoked the He's a tenured professor statement (I have a general bias against tenured professors) and the rest of your argument was right on. I was spitting at my screen until the last few paragraphs of the blog.

I don't trust a college degree from anywhere to prove anything other than that the student was able to finance his/her purchase, regardless of school. I know this will not be taken well by several folks, but it's not a complete disregarding of higher education (take me on my word or call me an idiot, you'll probably be right).

Cheating is a fact of life. When I was in college, the punishment was expulsion. This rarely happened. It was the old "make the punishment so awful that nobody would want to commit the crime", and it fell flat as soon as human beings were put in the picture.

Those who knew how to get away with it almost always got away with it. And even when caught, the book was rarely thrown at them. This "tenured" professor is trying to find a way to separate cheating from passing. I don't know that he'll be successful. But the traditional "Turnitin" approach is working as well as anti-malware software/devices work. It's an arms race. The solution isn't to build better detection or encourage better behavior from users ... it's to make the attack irrelevant.

I'm skeptical that it can be done, but I like the approach. I don't believe this is a Lazy Coward operation (good to edit it out, but I didn't downmod you, I thought your comments were fair). It's a creative, and possibly disruptive, method to teaching.

Edit: Sorry, it's really difficult to write out a reasonable reply without reading it over a few times and making changes.

reduxredacted··on Ask HN: What do you do on the weekends?
Work-life balance is when your work is reasonably a hobby. In coding, a lot of the things we hate at work tend to be the bureaucracy associated with being part of a traditional corporate "team".

I always joke that I'd do 80% of my job for free (as long as the people I'm joking with don't work for the company that employs me).

I liken it to architecture/building: The day job is designing and overseeing a great McMansion. In the end, it's pretty nice, but a lot of the time is tied up in passing inspections. On the weekend, my kids (...and me) have the most amazing tree-house ever imagined.

reduxredacted··on Comcast cuts off customer for going over 250GB of legitimate use
Just decided to check on the unlimitedness... My father's company has Comcast Business Internet and I setup their network. I think they have 15 employees, 5-6 of which would regularly be using a computer/internet connection.

The Buffalo DD-WRT router they're plugged into---Comcast gives you their own, but I wasn't trusting of a router that they likely had remote access to, so I installed an inner network---indicates that he's been doing a little over 500GB of transfer per month for the last five months. I haven't heard of any problems with him getting notices of going over (but I am going to have to ping him about those numbers... they're a manufacturing outfit and I don't think anyone there knows what a cloud service is ... most likely they're unwittingly becoming a cloud service for a botnet).

reduxredacted··on Comcast cuts off customer for going over 250GB of legitimate use
To be clear, though: Water and Electric utilities in the US (and I believe this is true of Canada) are also heavily regulated, including the requirement of a government approved meter that measures in a consistent and accurate manner. In addition, one pays based on what one consumes at rates that are at least partially controlled by another regulatory body. In our area, this is the case because there we have no choice to use a different electricity or natural gas provider. The same could be said about our options for broadband service, except that it lacks the same oversight. As a result, municipalities that have AT&T, Wide Open West, Comcast and a variety of less-fast DSL options have significantly better "specials" and even service options. I, for instance, can subscribe to Comcast Business service, whereas my parents a few cities over, where Comcast is the only reasonable choice, can only use their residential option.

I agree, it's not a right, but I think the author is correct in stating that Internet access is an essential utility.

reduxredacted··on The Art of Surprise (commentary on" illegally" installing software)
I have to come out on the side of Apple on this one, but this is also a big case of serious over-reaction. While I did find the idea rather interesting, as a former employee of CompUSA in my youth, I was endlessly frustrated by pranksters (prankster, artist -- that depends on who's shoes you occupy at the time).

Every single day we had someone come in and try the old "echo y|format c:", create various silly GWBASIC:

     10 PRINT "Something Really Profane"
     20 GOTO 10
or at worst, insert virus infected floppy disks (yes, that was how long ago I worked there), or otherwise make the demo machines, both Mac and PC, non-functional.

We had a guy create a DOS TSR app that made the internal speakers spit out beeps at random intervals, random lengths and random pitches, all precisely timed. We thought it had to be an employee, since someone would have otherwise noticed a customer methodically visiting each machine.

I knew it was an employee, because I was the one who did it. No member of the Secret Service came knocking on my door. Thanks to the lack of video cameras at the time, I didn't even get reprimanded (my direct boss knew I did it, but thought it was art, or at least, rather funny, and it was done on a Wednesday in the summer, so it was minimally disruptive ... it also didn't involve taking pictures of folks without their knowledge ... legal or otherwise, that just has an ick factor to it).

EDIT: Didn't like that last sentence, needed more dots.

reduxredacted··on All NeXT Inc.'s Plant Lacks Is Orders (1990)
I was in elementary school and a guy came in for "Career Day" to speak with the five of us who were interested in computing. He brought a NeXT computer (I have no idea which one), with some rectangular cartridge (must have been the magneto-optical media). He explained why it was such a fantastic machine, and proceeded to spend the allotted 30 minutes attempting to boot it.

I have no idea who this guy was or what he did for a living, but it was my very first experience watching a demo go horribly wrong. I have to say, that event influenced me in over-preparing for any sort of demo. I don't remember the details, but I remembered that it was NeXT, and I remembered that it didn't boot. (OK, I'll admit that I partly remembered the name because the capital XT reminded me of my clunky IBM PC XT clone I had at home).

reduxredacted··on Microsoft refuses to endorse WebGL, labels it ‘harmful’
I'm actually a big fan of several Microsoft products, and think their stand on WebGL is completely right.

OEM video card drivers have a history of already being unstable. In all likelihood, this represents an attack vector that, up until this point, I hadn't even thought of.

That said, it highlights something that has become somewhat of a trend with Microsoft. They seem to have decision making in almost every area being done by different teams who don't talk to one another. While I agree that OpenGL isn't "safe", what about ActiveX? Isn't allowing a browser to execute arbitrary code directly against the processor (regardless of whether or not its "signed" and the user had to click a few dialogs), a far greater threat? I'd love to see a press release that indicated they were ripping that functionality out of all currently supported browsers. What about Silverlight? I thought that had elements of hardware acceleration (perhaps it's protected enough, who knows?).

Kudos, to them, for taking a well reasoned stand for security in an application type that is routinely used to attack users, but I'd like to see the other 'harmful' features addressed as well. For now, I find Firefox with NoScript and Adblock+ to be the safest bet.

reduxredacted··on F*: A Verifying ML Compiler for Distributed Programming
Microsoft Research does some interesting stuff, though I have to take issue with their choice of naming. One wonders if they're trying to poke at search engines.

The "#" in C# made it painful, in the beginning, to craft a good query. Now they're using a symbol commonly interpreted as a wildcard.

I'm not insinuating any evil intentions with the name (that's a little ridiculous since it's an experimental language to begin with), but it's a little odd that they'd choose something that will likely be search engine unfriendly... again.

reduxredacted··on A simple tool to check if Lulzsec has leaked your personal data
spam is a solved problem.

I think that with regard to gmail, the spam problem has shifted back to overly aggressive filtering, rather than being solved. And with Priority Inbox, it seems like it shouldn't have to be that way.

When Priority Inbox was added, the idea of putting all of the adverts I signed up for in one view, and the rest right in front of me was a huge improvement.

The problem is that more and more, I'm finding the things that I actually signed up for end up in my spam folder rather than in this "middle tier" where I can assign them high priority if I care enough about them. Notifications of a new statement from a few banks of mine, not always, but often, end up flagged as spam. Many companies that I do business with and have specifically signed up for their adverts end up flagged as spam. I can whitelist them, sure, but I was so used to accepting that the spammers have won that I hadn't started looking in the spam folder until very recently (and when viewing my inbox, it takes one click to even see that I have new mail being sent to Spam).

Alice.com, Onlive, Godiva, Subway, local mall, local car dealership, credit card "points" account, beautician (if you haven't guessed, I share this account with my bride), all flagged as spam. Of the 71 items, 2 are traditional spam (one for prescriptions I don't need yet, and one with random letters and numbers from a woman I don't know).

Edit: bad grammar on my prt.

reduxredacted··on Why I won't be using Groupon again.. A consumer perspective.
It's interesting to me how many news articles are out lately taking a negative tone toward Groupon. I'm sure that has a lot to do with the upcoming IPO (and I won't be an investor based on the numbers), but I thought I'd share my experience with Groupon, because I've never had anything close to this sort of problem.

We had a $20 for $40 deal at a restaurant owned by a local restauranteur. There were no restrictions other than that the Groupon couldn't be used for the tip, which, on the Groupon indicated that the tip should be made against the total bill because "groupon customers are good tippers" or something like that, I found that statement kinda silly, and I just thought it was common knowledge in the US that you always tip on the pre-discount price.

The place had piqued my interest because it was nearby and it wasn't a chain nor did it appear to be owned by one of the larger businesses that plant unique, but rather predictable, restaurants. That's unusual around here.

There were little/no reviews of this place on Yelp and I can say with certainty that there is no way I would have tried this place at this time were it not for the Groupon. The restaurant was "new", which usually equates to a long line and an unprepared kitchen staff. I have children, and frankly, when there's an opportunity to take my bride out for a night on the town, I'm going to go someplace that I know will be good. Nothing is worse than setting up a date, a baby-sitter, and then getting crappy food/service and overpaying for it. Because of said baby-sitting fees, I also won't venture to a place that's far away. I'd rather spend the money on the meal, not the college kid who sits on my couch and watches TV while the kids sleep.

This place ended up being fantastic. It was also inexpensive even without the Groupon. So to point #1: The only reason I went was because of the discount, but point #2, we've already been back once and even later purchased a $50 gift card for my dad on Father's day. I think a lot of the issues with point #2 have to do with the small business in question. We didn't have any limited "Groupon" menu (and I wouldn't buy a deal that's structured that way ... there would be too much of a temptation for the owner to cheapen it up if they were having a bad Groupon experience), nor were there any alcohol limits (which is really common).

Groupon worked great, at least for me, in discovering a new local business. We're planning yet another trip back in two weeks. My bride and I both wrote a thorough Yelp review afterward, we liked the place so much. Is it a good value for that business or would that money have been better spent advertising in other ways? I have no idea/that probably depends on the business. If he's got the working capital to run at a loss for 6 months, I'm willing to bet this place sticks around, provided the food quality doesn't change (the price could go up substantially, and I'd still continue to eat there).

reduxredacted··on Title Inflation Emerges With A Vengence
I’ve never paid much attention to titles.

Thank you. Please, can everyone start doing this? It cuts both ways. I have a friend who is one of the best people I've ever known. I also worked for this person for a long period of time in a previous life. You couldn't imagine a better boss. He was the guy who did everything to cut out the red-tape of a large organization so that his employees could focus their time. He was also great at honing an idea even when that idea wasn't something that he knew all of the details about (I was a C# developer, he was big into php, perl, linux, etc).

He thoroughly earned a Director title at that company. Titles weren't garbage over there. They were tied to bonus payout percentages and salary scale (which determined the maximum that a person could make, not a minimum, of course).

He's now unemployed due to circumstances beyond his control (yes, there's no such thing as "beyond his control", he could have been interviewing before the collapse that resulted in him losing his job, hindsight 20/20 I'm sure).

He'd take any job right now, manager or not and he's one of those rare folks who has the skills required of a both a hacker and a good manager. When he makes it past HR, it's usually because the shop doesn't have an HR department. When he gets the interview, there's always concern expressed about his willingness to handle a perceived downgrade. When they call his references (I'm one) it's in the top 5 questions asked of me. They don't understand that this guy would be as useful and work as hard as an assistant to the regional manager as he would as a Director.

Edit: fix some grammatical/emphasis problems.

reduxredacted··on Show HN: Boot ‘strapped’ in Detroit
I noticed on your About Us page that your company is located in Ann Arbor, which piqued my interested even more.

For identification purposes, I've found that many people (in the US at least) know of Ann Arbor. It's the home of the University of Michigan. It's not a small town. It's got an activist base not dissimilar to San Francisco. And it's got a reputation (perhaps skewed by my own local sense) of being a place with a lot of bright, interesting young minds and otherwise successful and wealthy folks.

Detroit, on the other hand, is generally written about as though it's a city in a war torn third-world country.

Before I ask my question, I really don't this comment to be taken rudely (and I'm having a tough time phrasing it in a way that doesn't sound like I'm pointing a finger: "You're not really in THE D!!!") That's not my intention, please give me the benefit of the doubt on that.

Are the founders actually from Detroit or the Metro area and the company and their current location just happens to be located in Ann Arbor, or was it a marketing decision? If it was marketing, it worked for me. I believe you would get more clicks here, more traffic to your site, and ultimately more feedback by using Detroit over Ann Arbor in the name.

I'm not judging your motivations negatively either way, I'm just curious. I do not live in Detroit, but grew up in the metro area and have a very personal relationship with the good and the bad parts of the city. Most of us from the place I grew up, when asked, respond with "I'm grew up in Detroit". It's a small talk "out". It avoids the whole "where exactly is that" in the conversation (which, when you're from The Mitten State, requires pulling out your right hand to point at where you actually live). The "I grew up in Detroit" has changed the last 5-10 years to include the important a suburb (or even a distant suburb) of Detroit because it's no longer an "out" to say I'm from Detroit. The questions that follow can fill 30 minutes.

reduxredacted··on Introducing Prompt. Nice SSH for iOS.
I'm presently using iSSH, which supports port tunnels (SSH Port Forwarding as PuTTY calls it).

Could anyone enlighten me as to whether or not it supports SSH port forwarding and how well that works? iSSH works pretty well, but it pops up regularly warning that it's going to disconnect due to inactivity (despite the fact that I'm actively using the port tunnel to RDP into something).

reduxredacted··on FBI wants public help solving encrypted notes from murder mystery
When I trying to convert from hand-writing to upper-case text, I couldn't help but think about the loss of fidelity.

It's an important point. It may have meant something, or it may have meant that he was writing on a piece of paper against a surface that wasn't large enough, so he had to shift the paper around (I wonder why the second page has a bunch of circles around text, while the first page does not).

reduxredacted··on FBI wants public help solving encrypted notes from murder mystery
Precisely my thinking. It would have been helpful if there were higher resolution scans of these images.

I had difficulties reconciling 5's and S's, or the various ways in which the letter "B" was written (it really looked like there were two "B"'s in the document, though that would be difficult to tell even with higher-res photos as anything handwritten is subject to whatever surface it was written on).

reduxredacted··on FBI wants public help solving encrypted notes from murder mystery
Excellent. I personally love this sort of thing, though I'm rarely successful.

I was typing out the letters as I saw them, and I noticed that I interpreted many of your "S" as the number 5, but after looking at the way he wrote "S", it appears relatively consistent throughout the text.

So letter groupings became interesting: SE - 66 matches RSE - 18 matches

In the first document TFNRE appears twice.

Here's my interpretation from looking at the two documents (I really wish there were seriously high resolution scans of these docs, it'd help to sort out the asterisks which I used to represent characters I couldn't reasonably identify)

    (M*ADMKNE#R-N-STA-KNARE) (ACSM)
  *TFRNENP*NSEWPBSERCBBNSENPRSEINC
  PRSENMRSEOPREHLDWLDNCSE(TXFLFTCXLNC*E)
  AL-*RPPITXLYPPIYNCBEMEKSE*C*SEPRSE
  WLDRCBRNSE*T*SNE*TXSE-C*SLE-CITRSEWLDNCBE
  ALW*PNCBETSMEL*SERLSEVRGLSNEASNWLDNCBE
  (NOPFSENLRENCBE)NTEGDDMNSENCURER*BR**
  (TEWETFRNENC**TSENCBEI*G)
  (FIRSEPRSEONDE71NCBE)
  (CDWSEPRSEONSE74NCBE)
  (PRTSEPRSEONERDE76NCBE)
  (TFNGCMSOLEMRDELUSETOTEWLD*WLD*CBE)
  (194WLD'SNCBE)(TRFXC)
Page 2

  ALPNTEGLSE-SE ERTE
  YLSE MTSE-CTSE-WSE-FRTSE
  PNRTRSEONDRSEWLDNCBE
  *WLDXLRCMSPNEDVLDSTSMEXL
  DULMT6TUNSENCBEXC 

  (*UNSARSTENMUNARSE)
  KLSE-LRSTE-TRSE-MKSEN-MRSE
  (SAE6NSESEMRCE)

  NMRCBRSNEPTE2*TEWSRCBKN*E
  **MLSE74SPRKSE29KENO*OLE17SRTRSE
  8S*LECLG*E**NUTRE*KRSEPSESHLE
  6SIMTCSEHTLSENCUTCTRSNMRE
  99.84S2UNEP2SENCRSEAOKTSENSKSEN*SE
  NSREONSEPVTSEWLDNCBE(JXORL)
  *NMSENRSEINRNTRNTRLERCBRNSENTSRCR*NE
  LSPNSENGSPSEMKSERBSENCEAVXLR
  HMCRENMRENCBE     1/2MUNDDLSE
  D-W-MIYMPL XDRX

This is the sort of problem I'd like to give to my child (as Douglass Adams states throughout his books) ... no bias or formula to work with. The "Street Smart" comment struck me a bit. When I was a kid, being "Street Smart" was a compliment used in contrast to someone who is "Book Smart". Being "Book Smart" was bad. Street Smart == Application of knowledge, Book Smart == would beat you at trivial pursuit/Jeopardy, but wouldn't know what to do with that knowledge.

EDIT: Ahh, half my comment was missing!

reduxredacted··on Googlers Buy More Junk Food Than Microsofties (And Why Rapleaf Is Creepy)
The Kroger loyalty programs gave me the creeps several years ago when I first moved out and had to buy my own groceries.

Since you have to be a member of the tracking program to take advantage of any specials, I signed up, but I used the stores address, phone and contact information. The cashier asked for a driver's license which I had misplaced. She wasn't an idiot. She just didn't sufficiently care.

It bothered me that I had to lie to protect my privacy and be able to get any of their advertised specials at the advertised prices, so I found an alternative grocery store in my area. It's a greenbacks only, bag it yourself in your own bags store.

They carry good produce, meats, and the usual grocery items -- except that there's very few well known brands, but I got used to the "sort of Coke" and "almost Cheerios". Which was easy to get used to when I saw my total grocery spend was cut in half.

Unfortunately, I value my money over my privacy in most cases. Fortunately, this was one of those cases where valuing my privacy turned out to be a win all around.

EDIT:: Punctuation.

reduxredacted··on RIP Digg
Digg was awesome.

I remember when I created an account on the site. A friend kicked a link my way from Fox News of all places ... that mentioned the site alongside Slashdot. In my job at the time, crowdsourced sites focused on technology were very useful. I left the site about a year after they decided to open up to general news. My fear was that it would become what many of the emerging Web 2.0 news aggregation sites became: a political activist haven. Within several months (not overnight as I had feared), it had ceased being a useful resource. The breaking point was when there was no way to configure my profile to filter out crap-political-commentary. I wrote them to have my account removed (something that couldn't be done with a few clicks at the time).

I had taken it out of my daily "sites to check on" in 2007, but after reading some commentary about how "all of the Web 2.0 sites had become BIASED! (OMG!)" in early 2009, I visited the front page (now without an account with filters setup). The top stories of the day were dominated by nearly everything that a former female candidate for vice president had made.

I love Hacker News because despite its growing popularity, it has maintained civility and avoided (most of the time) entries focused entirely on politics.

reduxredacted··on Ask HN: Trust and remote work
My advice from the perspective of a remote worker:

Rule #1: Communicate directly, precisely, and clearly.

It's not about how hard someone works, when you're managing remote workers, in that it's not about how many hours (to be clear: too few or too many). You have absolutely no way to micromanage their time, so you must set expectations at the project level. "Feature/Component X needs to be done by day Y, and if that deadline is going to slip you need to let me know as soon as you see that happen so that I can plan accordingly." You might have someone who gets Feature X done on day one and slacks off the rest of the time. But you got what you wanted.

If you expect them to be available and contactable at certain times of the day, state it clearly. If you don't care as long as the job gets done, don't hold them to certain hours and state that clearly.

Rule #2: Remote workers, especially ones who are new to working remotely, can tend to feel "left out" or "lonely". This is, in my opinion, the equivalent of the manager of remote workers feeling like their workers are not completing work in a timely enough fashion. In an office environment where you can toss a piece of paper at your boss, you can get constant feedback. In a remote environment, that's impossible to replicate completely and dangerous to try to replicate for people who write software (where interruption kills productivity). Whenever there is a lack of communication, both parties tend to jump to the worst possible conclusion. The manager assumes the employee is being lazy, the employee assumes his manager is incapable of handling remote workers and is looking to fire him at any moment (so some of that slack time is spent getting the resume together and shopping it at alternative places of employment). Back to Rule #1.

I know it could be a motivation problem ... maybe I just need to challenge them on their speed...

Yes, but do it by giving them clear deadlines, not by questioning their lack of motivation. When the work is completed properly and on-time, ask for feedback about the deadline to ascertain if you were being too reasonable or very unreasonable. When it slips, say these words: "What do I need to do differently to ensure you can reach the deadline next time?" This is a nice trick. If your developer says "nothing, I just needed more time", you can carefully launch into questions about (1) whether or not they have the right skill-set, (2) if they're having difficulties with the remote work arrangement and how that can be solved. You sound like a pretty decent guy who would give his employees a good deal of slack if they're just a little slower. Work that angle a little bit, but be careful to not allow that to be something that can be taken advantage of.

Consider a Skype video call on occasion. Video calls just "feel" more connected.

Just to add a little perspective to my advice:

I work remotely. Three days in a remote office, two days from home. My bosses have ranged from being on different continents to being as close as six hours drive away. My "remote office" is 7 people, none of which work in my division. I was new to working remotely six years ago, prior to which I had a "boss two cubicles over" sort of working arrangement. It took a little while to adjust, but I had a very good manager who who managed both his local and remote employees this way (some of his staff start work at 5:00 AM, some start at 10:00 AM, he doesn't care as long as the work gets done). I also write software all day, sometimes as part of a team, sometimes as a lone developer. So use that when deciding to take my advice. My situation may not fit with your circumstances.

reduxredacted··on Your Username Will Now Serve as Your Password and Your Password as Your Username
Discounting the absurdity angles of all of this, there is always one positive: We'll all have an opportunity to update our list of disallowed passwords.

The usual suspects will be there (within the parameters allowed by the application), but there will be new ones to add to the list.

reduxredacted··on What does it feel like to be unattractive and desired by none?
My question: Why didn't the guy with the height issue not use his real name, or at least a contactable pseudonym?

I believe the answer lies in his statements about lacking confidence.

I completely agree with you regarding meeting someone in social situations where something other than "dating" is the primary purpose. From personal experience, though, those circumstances are more difficult to approach a person you're attracted to (unless they are specifically geared toward meeting people (for relationship purposes) within a specific shared interest). Nonetheless, if you lack confidence to approach a prospective mate, the setting won't matter much, you simply won't approach someone you're interested in.

Personally (as I had written previously), I advocate diving in head first into the "dating scene" without prejudging the scene. You've referred to it as shallow and sex focused. It doesn't have to be. Commit to not having sex until you're married, or some other meaningful milestone and approach the dating scene that way. I didn't find my bride in the shallow, sex focused dating scene, but I would have never approached her if I didn't have the practice that said dating scene gave me. I believe, in most cases, men have a one-up that the person answering this question failed to take into account. Most men place a far higher value on physical attributes than women do (though, height is one of those attributes that seems to be very important to the women I've known, so I sympathize with this gentleman ... being skinny and not muscularly developed tends to follow pretty closely, though ... and I'm in that camp).

I remember how difficult it was at the time, and how insecure I was, but it got easier and I wouldn't have met my bride if not for the miserable experience of submitting myself to rather consistent rejection.

← PreviousPage 2 of 6Next →