207 karma · joined May 2, 2011
We've moved back to an MPA structure with decorated markup to add interactivity like scroll views, fetching data, tabs and other common UX use cases. If you view the source on yahoo.com and look for "wafer," you can see some examples of how this works. It helps to avoid bundle size bloat from having to download and compile tons of JS for functionality to work.
For a more complex, data-driven site, I still think the SPA architecture or "islands" approach is ideal instead of MPA. For our largely static site, going full MPA with a simple client-side library based on HTML decorations has worked really well for us.
Some of his points are valid about maintainability and complexity, but that can be resolved by building smaller components to share markup and classes. All depends on the use-case.
Disclaimer: Maintainer of Atomizer.
Backend dev -> Angular -> Vue?
I primarily do frontend and I never found the Angular/Vue frameworks to compelling to learn. I like React more but don’t have to use it with every project. I’m curious if the Angular/Vue audience is of a certain type of engineer.
Small utility classes without writing CSS, seems like the same thing.
Disclaimer: I worked with the devs that created it.
My shameless plug is my old MIDI site called MIDI Delight. I had user registration, ratings, comments, top 10 lists, etc. I always wanted to get it working again like you did. It would be cool to see more user features added on your site.
I’m glad there is a new MIDI site carry the torch.
This avoids having to click back through each slide.
Which part of Fluxible feels verbose?