realitysballs

Yeah low-level language conflated with low-level coders , means the opposite in some sense

Only in the USA would people be ignorant enough to rescind funding that supports the protection and conservation of world-famous wildlife resources that also are able to sustain there own revenue source. Yosemite can pay for itself and then some if the government just let people work and collect fees (aka fee technicians).

Agreed, I want tangible examples to pair & case studies to pair with the overall trend. Weak journalism

What is the name of your website ?

I wonder if there’s a way to hack it back

Such a classic episode

Drama queen

Very productive coversating here

Well said

I wanna try this out. What a tease

Do you have any references or evidence to back up this statement?

I second.

Jeez 3.1GB … what’s the advantage of having the LLM on device?

Super incredible content. Personally I believe your outline is the most valuable part of the website .

I have ADD and have a hard time looking at large blocks of text unless I have something on the line. But the content is super solid.

What’s the business model? Is this FOSS or just OSS?

Wait— why are all the stats from the article based on users ‘on android’?

…is that even a reliable metric ? Is android users representative ratio of iOS users and web users as well?

This is Foss project…

I don’t know if that matters. I think the optics are bad for the public account of CEO to be used so seldomly.

They could have easily assigned the task to a marketing/media person…

Someone should calc out when it will start flooding

Before exerting a lot of effort/energy do a rough napkin-sketch calculation determine upper& lower bounds of tax burden / ramifications.

Only take efforts that are quality to or lesser than the tax burden and/or the risk/cost of not filing anything altogether.

Weak argument

I’m intrigued

Did you read any content of top posts shown in the article ? …it is quite toxic stuff. Seems like foreshadow . Hate to kill optimism though.

I second this

I think the real issue is that the small lens build gives it an effective focal-length of an 18mm camera . So everything appears very wide angle. It’s easy to spot professional non-phone photos when larger focal lengths make faces appear much flatter (better).

Oh man I feel like I had exact same outcome for that experiment. Also when logging your food for nutritional analysis I ate much healthier food during period of logging.

In an amoeba or what?

Need something more to the point here. This is one is 14 mins : https://youtu.be/Mqg3aTGNxZ0

Yes that does sound quite interesting and valuable v line of research but don’t you think one-off high-res MRI scans might advance humanities understanding of the brain in a meaningful way more so than low-field MRIs for all? I think this is more about the long game (scientific development) than how an average person right now could benefit from the new advance perhaps.

Intentions are good here , but the name is highly similar and so if you want to promote the project it seems fitting to rename for the sake of gaining more trust from new users. It is annoying though that the open-source well-intentioned project has to make the change tho.