realharo

Plus, from my experience, the more obscure topics, which are not easy to google, also tend to suffer the most from hallucinations when using LLMs. The topics which ChatGPT can explain perfectly usually have well-written explanations at the top of search results too.

That's not to say that a new twist on it can't be successful (most successful things aren't entirely original), but if you're worrying about someone releasing their version earlier and beating you, just take a look around.

This can also refer to wealth inequality. Especially between people who work for a living vs people who own assets for a living.

And it's worth putting that first, because it's arguably most likely to actually happen of all these threats.

Wordle clone tutorials are of course all over the web (just google make wordle clone and see the results), but what about a browser extension + Discord bot, that lets groups of friends compare their scores for the official Wordle, in Discord.

It would automatically post people's results to a Discord server - both the score, and a picture of the full guesses under a spoiler tag. And maybe during playing, the extension would show status like "if you solve it now, you'd be better than 50% of people in the server today". And post a weekly top 3 at the end of each week.

Something like it has probably been done before, but nowhere near as much as the examples I mentioned in my previous comment. Might be a bit too big at this cost though.

I would like to see it in action, and then I'll form an opinion.

People really should start using examples that don't have literally thousands of step by step tutorials all over the web.

That includes clones of Wordle, Flappy Bird, generic todo lists, etc. With those, I can't tell how well the abilities would generalize to real world projects.

There are always entire comment chains talking about how important it is to invest wisely and then plugging some random person's name.

The only way this ends is with either requiring strict identity verification for posting, or giving up on comments altogether.

Not sure what you mean by volumes "not adding". One way to calculate it is like:

    density_alcohol = 0.789g/ml
    density_water = 1g/ml
    weight_total = 16g
    (density = weight / volume)
    
    volume_alcohol = 0.4 * volume_total
    volume_water = 0.6 * volume_total
    
    weight_total = weight_alcohol + weight_water
    
    weight_alcohol =
      density_alcohol * volume_alcohol =
      0.789 * volume_alcohol =
      0.789 * (0.4 * volume_total) =
      0.3156 * volume_total
    
    weight_water =
      density_water * volume_water =
      volume_water =
      0.6 * volume_total
    
    weight_total =
      0.3156 * volume_total + 0.6 * volume_total =
      0.9156 * volume_total
    
    volume_total =
      weight_total / 0.9156 = 
      16 / 0.9156 =
      17.4749 (rounded)
    
    volume_alcohol =
      0.4 * volume_total =
      6.99 ml (rounded)

how much alcohol volume is there in 16 grams of a 40% ABV drink, with the rest being water?

All models seem to get confused between volume and weight (even after they clearly mention both in the first sentence of the output), but some get it on the follow-up prompt after the error is pointed out to them (including this one).

Without it, you don't have that "this is guaranteed to exist at this point" indication that can actually reduce the overall number of checks in practice.

Most AI tools I've seen however can't seem to get away from the classic "prompt -> response" chat UI.

Even the "plan A" button code doesn't show the only interesting part of the code - how the UI is actually updated in response to the changed underlying data.

The few companies that will still exist, that is - many of them won't, when their product becomes almost free to replace.

Similarly, in the future, there may be no more "apps" in the way we understand them today, or they may become completely irrelevant if everything can be handled by one general-purpose assistant.

(not actually serious, at least not yet)

This is an extremely common example of an error. I wish people would put more effort into coming up with examples that aren't so common all over the internet.

The output even calls it "a classic example".

>Tech detox — Recharging away from your monitor makes you a better programmer.

Aren't these the opposite of each other? Do build stuff on your own time, but don't spend your own time on the computer?

It's like the difference between a bunch of shops having security cameras that they can look at the footage from, versus having every such camera connected to a wide surveillance network with facial recognition and querying abilities. Both are technically just a bunch of cameras in the same places, but not many people would argue it's the same thing.

Why do you think that?

People used to think that making paintings and poems would be one of the most difficult things for AI, and look how that turned out.