203 karma · joined June 28, 2019
If I just wanted the equivalent of Lodash's _.intersection() method, I get it. The requirements are pretty straightforward and I can verify the LLM code & tests myself. One less dependency is great. But with time, I know I don't know enough to verify the LLM's output.
Similar to encryption libraries, it's a common recommendation to leave time-based code to developers who live and breathe those black boxes. I trust the community verify the correctness of those concepts, something I can't do myself with LLM output.
https://practical.engineering/blog/2022/12/5/what-is-a-black...
https://spaceflightnow.com/2017/04/11/musk-wants-to-make-fal...
https://arstechnica.com/science/2017/04/this-six-year-old-vi...
https://youtu.be/4rC2Z5El-8E [Everyday Astronaut - Can SpaceX Reuse a second stage?]
Big Plane vs Little Plane (The Economics of Long-Haul Flights) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NlIdzF1_b5M
Trump gave the whole world a good idea how far ahead the newer stuff is when he tweeted an image from an NRO satellite. Estimated at ~10cm/pixel resolution.
Scott Manley published a great break down: https://youtu.be/JRLVFn9z0Gc
Whatsapp is not uncommon to be sure, but I would wager a significant portion of users in the United States have it installed because they chat with people overseas.
Signal & Telegram are pretty small userbases.
Fellow HN user quinnypig described it succinctly:
RDS is a huge win not because of anything intrinsic to what the platform actually is, but because we collectively suck at setting up and managing replication, backups, etc.
https://twitter.com/QuinnyPig/status/1173377290815721473As a result, it makes sense that even though Tesla and Lincoln are the lowest-ranked in terms of reliability, they continue to fare well among its buyers and rank high on its customer satisfaction index — proof that buyers may value brand loyalty and innovation over stability.
I believe 'stability' here refers to "an overall pattern of reliability", and not describing road handling. If the author wanted to use another word, perhaps 'dependability' would better than 'stability'.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/blog/2006/mar/14/ifmi...
So in this case they cited "no client-side routing wiz-bang" -- that's one of their opinions and won't be introducing any support for that sort of thing.
The classic example is Python's motto "There's Only One Way To Do It", which was in a response to Perl's "There's more than one way to do it."
Another example is Ruby On Rails...it has a strong opinion on how the application should be structured -- must be MVC, most of your code should be in a model, convention over configuration, etc.
"The x86 architecture is the weirdo" --Raymond Chen
https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20040914-00/?p=37...
https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20130320-00/?p=48...
https://www.getty.edu/research/library/faq.html#gettyimages
> No, Getty Images has no relationship to the J. Paul Getty Trust.
The "Getty" name derived from the same person, but the museum and Getty Images have nothing do with each other.
r = RAM. Instances are biased toward having more memory.
i = I/O. ... have fast SSDs.
d = DISK. ... lots of disk space.
x = XL. ... lots of RAM
g = GPU. ... have GPU hardware
...and of course now I realize this is already answered on SO. I'm keeping mine though.For anyone who has to constantly (re)evalaute EC2 instances, this is a huge understatement. Now, I just looked at AWS EC2 pricing page and it looks way better than what I remember using in 2018.
Back then, for a given instance family, the specs and prices were on separate tables, making it maddening to compare. And forget comparing across instance families. instances.vantage.sh nee ec2instances.info made that so simple. Even the AWS ProServe employees that I worked with preferred it.
So AWS may have closed the gap but ec2instances.info is still superior since it offers advanced features such as "sorting" and "searching". The "Compare Selected" is super handy as well.
The biggest plus for Vantage is that ec2instances.info wired in to my fingers, I suspect that's true for a lot of AWS devs. By buying this site, they get a lot of eyeballs for their product. And frankly, it does make sense - Vantage is trying to selling you a better AWS console, this is a better pricing page, so it fits. The original dev gets some cash for a side project that was probably a huge headache to deal with. Win win for both parties.
https://github.com/NuGet/Home/issues/10491#issuecomment-7684...
My inner conspiracy voice is telling me this is a fake and just a front for headhunters. Absurd, but true haha.
https://devblogs.microsoft.com/powershell/verb-noun-vs-noun-...
https://ilovepowershell.com/2013/08/05/microsoft-virtual-aca...