ratsmack

Meta already does that.

There are way too many "journalists" frothing at the mouth over Elon, because he doesn't fit their ideal of a "billionaire". Their writing displays almost a juvenile bitterness that I remember seeing in a teenagers rage rant. It's kinda sad.

>Is the server code open source?

>The entire client code is open-source. This code, once compiled, makes it possible to produce iOS and Android clients which are able to communicate with our production server (the exact same one used by the client applications downloaded from the App Store or Google Play), and thus enter into contact and chat with all other Olvid users.

>For the moment, however, we have chosen not to publish the source code of the server through which the messages transit.

More here: https://olvid.io/faq/server-and-open-source/#Does%20Olvid%20...?

>Its tagline ("more utility than a truck, faster than a sports car") speaks almost poetically to two distinct but orthogonal archetypes of threatened masculinity: the tacti-cool milspec dork, and the showboating rich guy.

The guy writing this is a bit unhinged, maybe even bitter.

With Tesla being constantly under the microscope, it would be difficult to not trust the data. They know that one misstep will seal their doom.

Some people just want to see the world burn, I guess. It's just new and different, just like so many things we now take for granted. It's one thing to be critical when something is a proven failure, but to never give it a chance means there is ulterior motive afoot.

The numbers indicate Tesla cares are safer per million miles driven than the US average.

https://insideevs.com/news/630650/tesla-safety-report-2022q3...

https://www.tesla.com/VehicleSafetyReport

What's the point of airing your grievances her on HN?

It's extremely poor form to air your dirty laundry and there is so much of it coming out of this org. If I was an investor, I would demand that the pipeline be shut until the org shown enough stability where people can have confidence in them. This has to be a terrible distraction to the general employees.

It's almost as if they suddenly realized that the technology exists for this. My belief is that they make more money by slow walking the process.

It usually happens during winter time in the US.

They are a horrible rag, but they have some very good points.

Your link is 404.

I don't think Trump has anything to do with this... besides, that's kind of a bold statement regardless of your political persuasion, and not appropriate for HN.

>Yes, that "we want to be just like men," that is, men as they are today, when in truth we need to change the society itself, men as well as women, to change everything. It is very striking in Betty Friedan: What she wants is for women to have as much power as men do. Obviously, if you are truly on the left, if you reject ideas of power and hierarchy, what you want is equality. Otherwise, it won't work at all.

It's too bad that people listen to this tripe... women will never be "just like men".

FYI... link [2] is 404.

>myth of maternity and the maternal instinct are not destroyed, women will still be oppressed

That's laughable... I guess this person doesn't believe humans have instincts, just like other animals.

The link seems to be bogus for some reason.

Why?... because laws only apply to the little people.

Why is there such a fevered effort to push women into an enterprise that most don't have an interest in?

I'm no fan of Google, but if it was me making the decision I would have told them to pack sand. Google is providing them with a service, not the other way around.

The industry and institutions of victimhood are well funded and growing. With the free flow of money they are able control much of media and social interaction. It will continue to grow as the money flows into the machine.

>Google is clearly aware that its system for handling DMCA complaints is routinely abused.

They do, but they just don't care about the little guy, because that would cost them money.

>Gruesbeck was driving a one-man lift when he struck his head on an overhead conveyance system, Amazon said. According to the company, he was working to fix a jam on the conveyor and was trained on how to use the lift.

It sounds like it was something that would be difficult to foresee. Without seeing the entire picture, it would be pointless to speculate beyond that.

They all switched because of commercial interests, not because everyone loved it.

But now, what are we going to do with systemd?

It is probably a solution as long as is doesn't moderate in a way to attempt forcing a narrow point of view as determined by the creators. We already have enough narrowly focused echo chambers out there.

>And make people who foolishly bought low range cars

That has absolutely nothing to do with this subject.

A lawsuit based on what?

It has nothing to do with political position, but has everything to do with those that are perpetually offended. The great thing is though, that everyone has the right to be as offended as they want to be.