rane

Aider is not agentic.

Why is it that in every Claude Code related submission there's people proudly declaring out-of-context they are not using AI tools?

If there's a post about Zig, you don't see people saying how they don't use Zig.

I don't have this experience. The mental mode might not be quite as strong, but if you always review the code given carefully, you will have a good pretty idea what is where and how things interact.

Just created this one to make it really easy for CC to interact with non-Anthropic reasoning models, in case of tough problems or just to get a second opinion on things.

https://github.com/raine/consult-llm-mcp

How is this different from the existing MCP support in Claude Code?

> command I run in one shell session is not immediately available as a history item in other concurrent shell sessions

It's hard to understand how any other way is usable. If you have a dozen concurrent shell sessions, some running a long running process for example, and you had to restart one of them, you wouldn't be able to just Ctrl-C and go to the previous command. For me it's way better shell sessions live their own life but the history is accumulated to a single pool.

Give better and more precise instructions.

Use the @ thing to prod it read some relevant files for context (kind of like with Aider)

It largely depends on how often you have to run the command.

Have you been able to interface Claude Code with Gemini 2.5 Pro? I'm finding that Gemini 2.5 Pro is still better at solving certain problems and architecture and it would be great to be able to consult directly in CC.

So what happens if you just put your phone in the check-in luggage and say you don't have a phone?

What are currently the best options for low latency TTS and STT as external services? If you want to host an app with these capabilities on a VPS, anything that requires a GPU doesn't seem feasible.

Maybe if you could explain what exactly is happening in the savebrace example because it's not clear how it relates to this.

Doesn't the infrastructure already exist?

Cursor is all the rage. Nobody talks about Aider, sadly.

Is this compatible with Amethyst? I want tiling windows but without the delay in switching spaces.

Not _all_ the code. Just the relevant parts.

The idea is that you give the libraries and APIs as context with your prompt.

Most of the time you are not able to fit the "Why?" in the summary.

That's what the body of the commit message is for.

Why isn't GPU VRAM a factor on a Silicon mac?

1080ti is most definitely not powerful enough to play modern games at 4k 120hz.

What could be the issue with exposing WireGuard at a random port to the public internet?

It works over UDP so it doesn't even send any acknowledgement or error response to unauthenticated or non-handshake packets.

What do you need Tailscale for? Why isn't Wireguard enough?

It doesn't if you use it as a bundled binary.

https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/4008/can-i-us...

https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/5188/software...

Not everyone wants to pay $99/year to be able to notarize software that is not going to make them any money.

https://github.com/disable-gatekeeper/disable-gatekeeper.git...

Do you have any examples of use cases Keyboard Maestro is great for?

I run k3s on a single hetzner ARM64 VPS and it works pretty well for personal projects. 2 vcpu and 4GB ram for 4€/mo.

How did you do animations for the menus and stuff?

Just one correction that Discord does not have to be downloaded as it works in the browser also. And you don't even need to provide an email address at first. As such, the barrier of entry is quite low.

The problem with aider for me is that it works in the terminal, where as coding happens in the editor, where I most likely already have the file open I want to transform with LLM. I probably even have my cursor on the thing or can at least easily select the function etc. that needs to be changed.

CopilotChat.nvim solves this somewhat elegantly for neovim, providing a streamlined UI to interact with an LLM in a way that allows accepting suggested diffs to your currently open buffer. The problem however is that it only works with GitHub's Copilot chat, as the name suggests. Not sure how well Copilot stacks up against gpt-4o for example but I'd imagine not that well.

edit: Quick demo of CopilotChat.nvim: https://github.com/raine/ghtool/assets/11027/e8d5820b-eafb-4...

This is pretty much the kind of UI I'd want for interacting with LLMs, aside from the typical Copilot style ghost autocomplete.

How does it keep you from switching from vim when vim does not have it?