945 karma · joined January 4, 2017
After that there were USENET/Newsgroups. Its a universal discussion board. You can still get to it by using 'news reader' software package and finding an open server. You can also pay for access but unless you really need the need the history ::cough:: or special content it's not worth it. Otherwise use Google Groups which is both a USENET reader and it's forum system (https://groups.google.com/).
Yahoo.com was the best directory at the time.(http://web.archive.org/web/19970124192912/http://www10.yahoo...) Back in the day there were few enough major websites that Yahoo had time to review and categorized sites by hand. As Yahoo became more of a search engine company and less of a director the Mozzill foundation created DMOZ.org.
DMOZ was supposed to be the 'democratic' replacement for Yahoo. With the open nature of the internet bad player starting getting up voted and it became spammed horribly. Plus search engine were getting big. It never really took off.
In between Yahoo being the dominate directory and Google trying to become the biggest search engine I like sites such as Webcrawler.com and Lycos.com. They're both still around. If I remember correctly Webcrawler still crawls site but it so back logged that its like 1-2 year behind. Lycos stopped doing it's crawls for a while was feed from Google search results. But it seems that Lycos started doing it's crawls again but with a really engine.
Finally we used a real time text chat system called IRC (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Relay_Chat). I loved using mIRC on Windows 3.1.(https://www.mirc.com/) It was simple and fast. But by modern standards it not very intuitive. Think of Discord where you can have unfiltered channels but with almost no filters.
FYI: if you want to have some fun check out Microsoft Comic Chat. It worked on IRC as well (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Comic_Chat). That was abused so badly at the time.
I'm not calling for a centralize regulating board. We need individuals and groups to be informed and inform consumers what they are getting into. Those same consumers have to be personally responsible for their actions. Otherwise, we will slip in totalitarian in a very short time.
The Apple Privacy Policy was updated on January 19, 2018.
https://www.apple.com/legal/privacy/en-ww/
What personal information we collect
* When you create an Apple ID, apply for commercial credit, purchase a product, download a software update, register for a class at an Apple Retail Store, contact us or participate in an online survey, we may collect a variety of information, including your name, mailing address, phone number, email address, contact preferences, and credit card information.
* When you share your content with family and friends using Apple products, send gift certificates and products, or invite others to participate in Apple services or forums, Apple may collect the information you provide about those people such as name, mailing address, email address, and phone number. Apple will use such information to fulfill your requests, provide the relevant product or service, or for anti-fraud purposes.
* In certain jurisdictions, we may ask for a government issued ID in limited circumstances including when setting up a wireless account and activating your device, for the purpose of extending commercial credit, managing reservations, or as required by law.
BTW: How your iPhone is tracking your every move
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/advice/11056373/How-y...
True (01) / False (00) - I assume that you will not support hexadecimal notation (00)
How will you note when its a textual semicolon from a string separator. IE: "a":";","b":"1" vs. a;;b;1
How do you tell a numeric value from a string character? IE: "a":1;"b":1 vs. a;1;b;1
Nulls what is test or is null: "x":null vs. x;000 < is this a string value, a hex value, or a null?
EDIT: From Apple's own website:
The personal information we collect allows us to keep you posted on Apple’s latest product announcements, software updates, and upcoming events. If you don’t want to be on our mailing list, you can opt out anytime by updating your preferences.
Although the tool (Google Translate) works to translate words in groups, rather than word-by-word translation, it's still not nearly as effective as human translators.
* Freeuim services with a ton of redundant commercials and dated content (Crackle, Midnight Pulp, Cocoro, Pluto). There a couple of 'classic' movies from the 70's and 80's (man I fee old now) but the commercials are automatically inserted by AI based on showing a commercial every 12 minute when the AI thinks the action is at slowest by audio volume. The problem is that it break the flow of the show because it ussualy a reflective moment and not a proper transition. Also I'll see the exact same Holiday Inn commercial 3-4 times at each break.
* Sub $10 services with less commercials and more recent content (Hulu.) I'm already paying for you. Why do I have you even more to turn off your commercial?
* Dull streaming service in the greater the $10 with no commercials (HBO, Starz, Netflix, Sling). These are great content but there some redundancy. Also I'm not going subscribe to each of you to get one or two shows when there's... cable.
Its getting to the point where viewers are saying 'Why do this when you can get a cable box that has a DVR or On Demand service and 'easy' customer service. The same customer service their high speed internet is going through. So there isn't much of a difference there.
If the streaming service was to survive they need to come up with a central application that lets you go more ala carte for your content at a less of an overall price easier navigation. Smart TVs and Roku boxes come close but it still a pain to switch apps. The cost advantage over cable isn't what it use to be. Steaming service had better be careful with pricing and content or cable will take over again.
- Google has been spearheading a protocol called 'QUIC'
- It bypasses tradition TCP by using UDP to create it's own version of TCP but encrypts the data it sends
- However it could be (is?) sending a bit and header that can make tracking the message path easier.
I would guess if that is true then and would not effect the performance the bit and header should be removed. I don't see what the fuss is about. Can't two different implementations exist along side each other and the public will choose the better one?
Correction: I misread the article and thought though spin bit was for an encryption key. Let this be a lesson to everyone: if you are going to comment at 2 am in the morning reread your article.
All of these JavaScript implementations use the V8 JVM and can make desktop and command line application. Depending on security settings they can give partial to full system access to the underlying OS just like Java. If this ruling is upheld I would look for Oracle to float a trial balloon on newer JavaScript implementations and for stealing their Java's API's.
https://pwa.rocks/ - Look at the business and news webpages
Also look for the website that use AMP. They're even more fragmented then PWA pages. Below is article about AirBNB using AMP and iFrames:
https://medium.com/swlh/how-airbnb-is-putting-amp-at-the-cor...