The political designation of where they were fighting is less significant, and actually makes this a better analogy for an American Citizen fighting in a foreign land against the American Govt.
1,019 karma · joined May 30, 2008
The political designation of where they were fighting is less significant, and actually makes this a better analogy for an American Citizen fighting in a foreign land against the American Govt.
>Be comforted, that in the face of all irridity and disillusionment, and despite the changing fortunes of time, there is always a big future in computer maintenance.
So are you saying that the current methods of education can't be improved?
I'm not referring to an intervention, which, like dieting, will not be useful in the long term. I'm giving you credit for hitting upon the idea that education itself can be altered in a manner which is not only far more effective, but evenly distributed improvements across all tested populations.
That's a great idea, and we all look forward to hearing of your progress in this endeavor.
It's far from an academic distinction to me, and that fight could have just as easily occurred if an African American had been called a Haitian, or any number of similar errors...
So you're going w/ B) A subtle entreaty to focus the brunt of America's educational efforts on specific ethnic subgroups so that the entire nation can have better results. The upside is that it's possible that whatever procedural improvements are made will probably improve all of the student body, so it's a win-win!
Unless, of course, you're also positing that these sub-groups can't be taught??
When he's referring to "Hispanics and African Americans" he is trying to refer to specific "racial" (insomuch as the concept exists) groups.
Are you saying that nations are irrelevant, and ethnicity is what really matters? Is this a subtle entreaty to focus the brunt of America's educational efforts on specific ethnic subgroups so that the entire nation can have better results?
Instead of blindly downvoting, I really am interested in the point of this statement.
You don't truly want to live forever, and lose everyone you know and will ever know. If everyone lives forever, then children will never grow.
Once you truly accept that change in not only inevitable, but extremely desirable, the fear of death is greatly diminished.
Which, of course, is why they are promoted as protection!
<conspiracyTheoryMode>
That's what they want you to think!
</conspiracyTheoryMode>
</conspiracyTheoryMode>The question isn't _whether_ students have any skin in the game, it's _why_ does an education cost X in the first place.
I had to work around this insidious creation http://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/8205
It creates a memory leak (it hit my getJSON calls) that slowly strangled one of my apps until it crashed the browser.
I list a lot of hours on that one...
About half the time I don't even turn it on, but when I do, I find that .7mph (the lowest setting) is just enough to keep me moving without having to think about it.
I keep my cpu's on a cart on the floor, and if I ever get tired of the arrangement, I still have a shelving unit. I'm about 1 month into this arrangement, but no problems yet, and it definitely helps to keep me alert and focused.
It will also cut into my mobile bill, because if this can operate on batteries for ~2hrs, how often do I really need to use my cell phone?