Knowing when to quit—it’s a lesson for everyone, of course. Knowing that when you take a gamble you could lose it all.
644 karma · joined April 12, 2018
Knowing when to quit—it’s a lesson for everyone, of course. Knowing that when you take a gamble you could lose it all.
I’ve not heard any concern
Because you’re not supposed to.
have heard a lot since the Ukraine war
Because you’re supposed to.
FTA: In Mali they discovered a 10x breakdown rate compared to home in Germany. And that wasn’t even war. Also, they lack spare parts. The beauty of just-in-time logistics. Read up on how much of a typical NATO army is operational at a given (peace) time. '91 was a long time ago.
Old Leopard 1 tanks would have been a better choice
There goes “crew survived”.
built for a different purpose: combined arms operations
“Easy. Just win before the tanks break down. Just destroy the enemy before you ever get close.” Someone should have explained that to the Ukrainians.
could be won with lots of artillery shells
Shells that NATO can neither supply nor produce in sufficient quantities.
highly mobile artillery
They have (had) enough of those. Barrel wear ruins the range, Lancets ruin the paint job.
Back in the real world:
Hangar queens: http://archive.today/2024.01.09-023929/https://www.spiegel.d...
Barrel trouble: https://x.com/DcDxii/status/1731800411965645092
Death traps: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMX-10_RC#Operational_history
And so on. If anything this war is a vindication of the Soviet approach.
https://symbolic.software/blog/2023-12-19-kyberk2sovariablet...
If an additional layer of symmetric-key crypto is required (for, say, post-quantum resistance), WireGuard also supports an optional pre-shared key that is mixed into the public key cryptography. When pre-shared key mode is not in use, the pre-shared key value used below is assumed to be an all-zero string of 32 bytes.
AV1 mandates support for film grain synthesis. Maybe, one day, this will become a standard part of film production.
‘Perverted, degenerate and indecent acts’
http://archive.today/2020.07.25-172048/https://www.telegraph...
Well, yes, that’s his job. Do you think that news media exists to inform you?
Keep reading.
>action of one person
The murder of the archduke was a literal conspiracy. Involving high-level spooks, too.
https://taiwaninsight.org/2018/02/26/cross-strait-relations-...
Force the “For You” tab after Every Single App Switch.
Randomly use a `WKWebView` instead of a `SFSafariViewController` as the in-app browser. Denying you various features like Reader, AutoFill, Fraudulent Website Warning, and content blocking.
Why? To fuck with you. Musk-Twitter has never been a good-faith operation. Where’s tech journalism when you need it? Thought they (still) spend half their days in that app.
Non-sequitur refutations followed by a wave of downvotes are my favourite HN feature.
I did neither write nor imply that the shelling caused the damage. I refuted lnsru’s spurious logic of attribution.
[0]: https://x.com/jnsaff
Exactly. These are stunts designed to keep morale high, in Ukraine and the West. Their impact on the outcome of the war is negligible. These are Ukraine + NATO dealing as much damage as they think they can get away with. And Russia absorbing the blows because the alternative—open conflict with NATO and curtailing the freedoms of millions of Ukrainians in Russia[0]—is considered a worse option. For now at least.
The Russian use of drones appears to be less effective then the Ukrainian use for whatever reason.
But thanks to the censorship in place we wouldn’t know, would we? In fact, Ukrainian officials have admitted more than once that the Russians know exactly what they are hitting. And the effectiveness of Ukrainian air defense is obviously way exaggerated.[1] The fact that Ukrainians have admittedly lost more than one fighter jet trying to shoot down drones and cruise missiles is telling.
will surely change some ways that wars are fought
Yes. No one is safe from this, every defense can be (fairly cheaply) overwhelmed.
But the situation here is unique in that Ukrainians can pretend they are not paying the price, and Russia does not respond with significant escalation. For now at least. As for NATO, well, they are paying a price. Bunkers containing NATO officers have been busted. Flimsy cover stories of freak accidents. Remember that B-2 going up in flames? Happened shortly after the attacks on Russian nuclear bases. Predictable, professional, restrained. All in all it’s something, but not enough to deter NATO, or even stop them from escalating slowly.
But then "Putin is someone who generally thinks that revenge is a dish best served cold," [CIA director] Burns said at an annual security forum in Aspen.
[0]: For these attacks usually have a local component. And from the flight patterns of NATO planes we can tell that Western ISR is essential to attacks on Crimea, for example.
[1]: A thing never talked about is the price paid by civilians. For there is a cost if you do AD over populated areas, you are trading civilians for military targets. Which, 18 months in, shouldn’t be located in cities in the first place. Random impacts of AD missiles, both Soviet and Western, are well documented. As are impacts of debris and downed missiles/drones, of course.
Easy on the hubris.
Or, you know, hapless Ukrainians. Ukrainians may have been quicker to innovate in this area but that was a long time ago.
Now, the people who volunteered for these experiments and began taking LSD, in many cases, found it very pleasurable. They told their friends about it. Who were those people? Ken Kesey, the author of "One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest," got his LSD in an experiment sponsored by the CIA, by MK-Ultra, by Sidney Gottlieb. So did Robert Hunter, the lyricist for the Grateful Dead, which went on to become a great purveyor of LSD culture. Allen Ginsberg, the poet who preached the value of the great personal adventure of using LSD, got his first LSD from Sidney Gottlieb, although of course he never knew that name.
NPR talking to Stephen Kinzer about his Poisoner in Chief: https://www.npr.org/transcripts/758989641 (The following paragraph, unfortunately, is extremely boomer and a grave misunderstanding of the situation.)
Romans thought so too.