Not everyone has infinite money to throw at tokens!
65 karma · joined January 22, 2013
Not everyone has infinite money to throw at tokens!
I've seen a LOT of bad managers do this.
Democracy is a corrective system, not a prescriptive one.
What are computers for?
Local first could be the file format that allows us to use devices without cloud services. Back to file first, vendors of software apps, pay for software once (or one year of updates or whatever).
It's s new horizon.
In “the capacity to effect the determination of resolve“ isn’t the “determination of resolve” the same as will power?
My attempt is to reframe as willpower as having mental capacity to take information into account, or to lack the capacity and default to path of least resistance logic.
In all three we are assuming there’s an actor making a choice. But I think we can stay at that level of abstraction for this discussion.
That does not oppose experiments with chemicals etc. Just offer a different explanation for how they work.
Yes, people are using them, mainly parking them, poorly. But that's always true with new things. Norms have not been established yet. But it's getting better fast.
Bicycles are still a huge problem in many cities but seen as morally good. The fact that people are using scooters so much is clearly an indicator of usefulness.
I don't think this is a problem. It just takes longer. Seeing bans like this always makes me sad.
Does this explanation make sense? Or am I missing something? Do the examples illustrate the idea, or are they vague?
I hope this helps, or that someone points out some clear flaw. Thanks
This dopamine view is a little oversimplified.
Does is significantly change the argument though? Even if dopamine is not the mechanism, the activities are still pleasurable?
Are you saying dopamine does not work like this?
With great intensity and interest chopping wood (or coding or whatever) can be really fascinating. Without interest most activities are chores.
What do you think? What's your strategy to live well instead of chasing the old high?
I'm using Roam and I still have this issue.
I think there's an argument to be made for culturally convergent "taste" as a measure of value. We like what others like, we're all trying to predict what others will like to increase our own status, etc. These forces should result in a convergent "good taste" to win.
100% agree with that.
My point is that there's very little work that doesn't in some way touch mobile devices. Most people use them for communicating about work all day every day. And yet still, like you said, they're treated like second class devices. Despite clearly being the largest form factor in use!
I think this is the legacy of my generation I'm trying to put my finger on here.
As long as us millennials create services, they'll be desktop first. Because that's how we're used to thinking. But when gen Zs create new tools, I would be surprised if they weren't mobile first.
The internet should be mobile & touch first. Desktop and laptop computer are niche products. Most people use touch devices.