55 karma · joined August 16, 2017
then you have heavy stuff, people trafficking, bomb threats, suicide threats, organ trade, child abuse, and crypto seriously limits the options for a response. as long as we're talking about functioning democracies, it does more bad than good.
now the hard part is selling the idea to the management, like "here are our ideal estimates, lets multiply it by 4". when doing freelance work i usually bill for the ideal estimated time multiplied by 2, the rest being my risk, on the other hand any changes in the requirements, or miscommunication is a risk of the client.
the main selling point for me was the api, and possibility of using it as a brain-computer interface, but i haven't done anything fun with it yet (except of setting up the drivers for python, and verifying it indeed works)
it is hard to learn. been to a 10 day vipassana retreat this year, and out of 100 hours of sitting, i've spent maybe 5-10 truly concentrated, and we're talking perfect conditions, with some prior experience
the most difficult part in my opinion is getting the reference point for how meditation should feel like - you can spend years doing what is breathing exercises, visualization, etc. never hitting that point. this is where Muse (https://choosemuse.com/) helped me tremendously
commercialization aside, the real question is about the value of guided meditation most of these apps are about. like, honestly i don't know.
like i feel totally safe around the cops, but at the same time i realize the "am i being detained" attitute would put me on a fasttrack to the realm of phony assault charges, no matter which country.
that's the interesting bit, because they got the results on a portable, consumer-grade device
FWIW it's a good piece of code, and i like it.
http://dcgi.felk.cvut.cz/projects/pacman-benchmark/thesis-co...
It seems that Unreal Engine is a better choice (Mass Effects, for example), but its pure C++ (with lua scripting), which means x3-4 as much of code, and trickier interoperability.
I dunno, tough choice. Good luck with your project!
It can serve as an indicator of ongoing dynamics.
If used to gain power, it's going to blow up in your face. From the psychoanalytic point of view, verbalizing solutions before the patient is ready is like the #1 worst thing someone can do, and the largest generator of resistance out there. Just don't.
Check Carl Rogers, if you're interested ("Client-Centered Therapy", "Counseling and Psychotherapy")
Richard Hamming
There's a wonderful book "The Shock of the Old" about the meandering ways innovation takes.
(can't find a source, saw it somewhere)
the moment it starts to feel like grinding, you should stop.
so basically, for the cost of implementing two operations you can reuse dijkstra or bellman-ford to do crazy stuff like belief propagation etc
http://www.morganclaypool.com/doi/abs/10.2200/S00245ED1V01Y2...
* fear of senior devs/architects, not holding them responsible for keeping stuff in order
* playing blame game instead of looking for structural solutions
* information compartmentalization to keep leverage, like we're running a spy cell and not a dev team