queenkjuul

Lol no X was and is toxic af

X and bluesky can both be toxic

Wow, I thought they all shut down after elon's CnD

> they're telling a gullible audience a story they want to hear because it's a nice way to earn a living.

Sure sounds a bit like Altman though ultimately, the audience being VCs

Nah they do, Sam does nothing but lie in an effort to keep up share price. Selling people an impossible future is the job of OpenAI CEO. If tokens were profitable it'd be selling tokens, but they aren't so the only other option is selling ridiculous predictions to investors

If you're starting a 4 year degree, whether the bubble bursts tomorrow or 6 years from now isn't that important: what's important is whether you want to start a degree in the bubble's field.

Likewise if you're signing a 30 year mortgage, knowing vaguely that the housing market is precarious is still valuable even if you don't know if it'll collapse tomorrow or in 6 years: you'll be on the hook either way if you sign today

Utility for investors i guess sure, but for people that aren't investors, it mattered much less when RIM went under than that they still did.

> The best models now are much better than the best models a year ago.

I went back to using Opus 4.8. I don't feel like the newest models are all that much better. The tooling around them has gotten better, and i guess mythos et al are good at hacking or whatever, but the models don't seem any better at not making mistakes than 6-8 months ago

> We don’t _need_ many things. But there are real problems that it solves and solves better than anything else.

I really don't believe this, nor do i believe any amount of regulation will actually prevent dipshit US cops from abusing it

>The question is: will Axon enshittify their mature products in order to pursue that panopticon money?

It would be an historic first if they didn't

I have no issue banning ring and nest cams, actually. They hand the data to cops too

I don't think they were arguing for flock, they were excusing doxxing the CEO, because if you're famous, you can't really get doxxed

Or the summers get so hot it all burns down

I would kinda be with you, except, climate change. And like, we didn't have nukes when the last world war started. This time we will.

I started to notice a shift in how the recommendation algorithms worked probably around 2018-2019 and then the pandemic just took it to nuclear levels against the entire population

I was staying up till 3 am listening to my iPod and reading books without internet then going to school at 7

I do think the internet was less bad back then (but still bad) and i also think sometimes teenagers just be teenagers

"Kind of" feels like the understatement of the century

And the reason given for the Italian collective was their far left politics...

If you think Walmart buying your digital info is bad, get this: cops and feds are allowed to buy it, too

Lmao

Arguably that number is 8℅ too high

You need to be a CEO to come to the opposite conclusion, apparently

There is absolutely mission critical work being done on GitHub... There are enterprises paying them for their CI and deployment pipelines

Lmao the Italian blogging platform has nothing to do with Palestine Action, did you even read the article?

Or do you even pay attention? "Far left" has been illegal in the past and trump clearly wants it so again

You have a lot to learn about Obama and Biden lol

No, they were not a brazen and stupid as trump, but they violated nearly as many civil liberties.

Obama executed a US citizen on terror charges without a trial, for starters

> How long till the world declares the US a "terrorist nation"?

When and if they do they will be many decades late

Lmao okay, name them for me please

No shit, that's why we review code...

You're not making a point

Then why be confident the LLM code won't crash

I still get occasional hallucinations, wrong answers, and entirely unnecessary change proposals from LLMs. An LLM being confident in its own work does not make me confident in it.