2 karma · joined May 1, 2025
Of course we're still going to need Enterprise level language models. We are still going to be using those apis. But significantly less often. Imagine having opus 4.5 level abilities of coding on your personal computer at all times. Within 2 years that'll fun on the average GPU.
They are going to have a really harsh reality in the future. Nothing against GPT. It is a great language model. I am having some issues with codex and 5.2. it likes to think too much. But it's not bad especially when you drop thinking after creating the task list.
I don't think they're worth that much though because of all that. They aren't really holding that much other than assets. Are they really holding on to 800 billion in assets? I guess you could argue that the vram prices have went up so maybe lol
We don't pour concrete underneath covers very often. They need it to be perfectly broom, swept and clean. They also need to cover over it just in case to moisture humidity gets down. Once it prints it does stay.
Dusty is a little bit better. The benefit is HP works off of Trimble so if you're in that ecosystem.
Trimble changed their business model so they've increased their profits but they haven't gained any more clients. Essentially they've learned how to double how much they make off of everyone.
You can shoot control off some of these generic models now that cost like four grand and they work just as good. That's less than Trimble subscription cost. I can only imagine the hp bundle coming soon.
So, are they suppressed? I highly doubt that's the proper word.
Less ambitious? Perhaps, but not suppressed.
Could they be a superpower? Yeah. But it's more likely some small country in Africa does first with an investor and AI.
They've pretty much just saturated their own market. Everyone needs a car. Not everyone needs an EV. If you have a garage then yes it makes perfect sense to have an EV. But if you don't and you live in an apartment or you live in a shared house. It's not really going to work for you. People who have their own house don't want old cars. So they basically just have a bunch of older car sitting around that nobody really wants even though they technically do have better value. A $30,000 Tesla and a $30,000 BMW? You'd have to be biased to think that it makes logical sense for the BMW. Sure! It's 40. It's fun but the cost of maintenance. The reliability.... It's not really a family car in the same way. It appeals to more people, but it's not more logical. However, you don't need a garage to charge your BMW. I don't care how fast the car charges. I don't want to go to a charger. I've had my car for 4 years and I've only been to a supercharger twice.
But I fully understand why not everyone has them. Every time I pass by a mechanic shop an oil change place like gas station. I just think of how much wasted time that people use on their cars thinking that it's more convenient.
But but for them in fact it may actually be. Imagine sitting at a charger for 20 mins 2x a week if you drive a lot and use sentry.
They don't just buy a stock and say hey. We invest in you. Lol why is it illegal. If you need to buy video cards right now for your business and you're doing machine learning. If you could go to one person with an unlimited budget, who do you go to, nvidia... Why? Is that because of insider training or is that because of logic? So if Nvidia says. Open AI. We really could use a lot of your API. We are spending an absolute fortune. You need our gpus. How about we make something work? Now negotiating begins.
This project is beautiful. This is an incredible work of art. It might not be the longest, but have you ever tried to pull cable over 2,000 ft hole? Have you ever seen what it takes to actually do those columns? The work looks nice very nice design. It fits with the landscape very well. And the fact that it cost only 140 million is an incredible. For a comparison if you look up one of the bridges I did. We spent 280 million on this We spent 280 million on this
I-91 Brattleboro Bridge | FIGG Bridge Group https://share.google/LKxgk1aEWh9gSIGhD
It's like saying I can't run. My arm hurts. Then you say. What do you mean? You're a quadriplegic!! He's like oh yea that too but I can feel a tingle in my arm. Treating the arm isn't fixing the problem lol. If that person was an advocate for treating tingles in their arm. You would think it's kind of silly because if they were to treat that. It doesn't really help the quadriplegic part. But he keeps saying it will. It's not that I don't believe he has a problem with his arm. I'm sure he does. But the problem on why he can't run isn't that.
Math teaches you how to think internally in an interesting way like algorithms of thought. Physics teaches you how the world works reading it is one thing. Understanding the language is where the beauty lies
You can only utilize so many people or so much action within a business or idea.
Essentially it's throwing more stupid at a problem.
The reason there are so many layoffs is because of AI creating efficiency. The thing that people don't realize is it's not that one AI robot or GPU is going to replace one human at a one to one ratio. It's going to replace the amount of workload one person can do. Which in turn gets rid of one human employee. It's not that you job isn't taken by AI. It's started. But how much human is needed is where the new supply demand lies and how long the job lasts. There will always be more need for more creative minds. The issue is we are lacking them.
It's incredible how many software engineers I see walking around without jobs. Looking for a job making $100,000 to $200,000 a year. Meanwhile, they have no idea how much money they could save a business. Their creativity was killed by school.
They are relying on somebody to tell them what to do and when nobody's around to tell anybody what to do. They all get stuck. What you are seeing isn't a lack of capability. It's a lack of ability to control direction or create an idea worth following.