qrian

Parent HN discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48998362

yeah same here

My understanding was that Christopher Alexander called the quality without a name "wholeness" later in their life. Does it mean a different thing than the "resonance" in this article?

itertools.count is probably what OP is looking for

This sounds like the concept of ‘normal science’ in paradigm theory.

Bedrock has a batch mode but only for claude 3.5 which is like one year old, which isn't very useful.

I'd rather have teachers assume stupidity than malice when it comes to student utilizing AI to essentially skip their learning.

I can totally believe that they deployed it because internal metrics looked good.

I see a lot of people getting confused, and the contention here is not that ChatGPT helped prepare for martial law in any way, but the fact that someone knew about it happening before it happened. Not really related to ChatGPT IMO.

Very interesting... I see a lot of parallel with my higher-ed startup - regulatory moat, fragmented market almost like consulting, and super long sales cycle...

Maybe I should be more mindful of integration cost than I do know.

For context, keygen allegedly has $195.4K revenue and 100 customers in 2024.[1]

[1]: https://getlatka.com/companies/keygen

Any parellogram would work since given four digit number n1n2n3n4, it is divisible by 11 iff n1+n3=n2+n4, and each ni is linear combination of the coords of keypads xi, yi, and thus (n1+n3)/2 = (n2+n4)/2

I tried to read many papers of Stafford Beer and cybernetics to parse some insights on complex systems to use in modern days but failed.

Project Cybersyn was just a dashboard (which was revolutionary back then of course).

Viable System Model was just another systems engineering diagram, which only has meaning to those who are deep into that field.

At least I got 'The purpose of a system is what it does' stuck in my head.

I also had to do this in my previous work and I took the phonetic embeddings of reference and transcribed text and ran a dynamic time warping with them.

Looks like the article is saying goal of 4 out of 6 is better than just setting 1 goal because missing 1 out of 1 really demotivates you.

So in the case of N divisible by 3, there are impossible end states. But can you still go ahead and declare that you will sort your library within the possible end states? If so how would one prove that one did not step outside of possible states without showing the cards themselves?

Maybe one could first divide the library into 3 piles and sort within each piles first.

The solution for IMO 2022 is barely a 1/7 solution. It just says ‘ might not satisfy the inequality for all y’ without a proof. That was the point of the question.

I am an idiot for running this in an unsandbox environment as it decided to rm -rf all files to restart from error, deleting a whole lot of important files.

It's still there!

https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/main/Python/future.c#...

Interestingly I have recently watched a video of Feynmann essentially saying "I cannot explain it to you because you don't have relevant background knowledge" to a question of "What makes magnets repel or pull each other?". Which agrees with the latter.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MO0r930Sn_8

I have such fond memories of talking to interesting people in IRC back in the days. I recently felt an urge to feel such companionship and satisfy my intellectual curiousity with interesting conversation, but found that freenode and libera is mostly dead. Perhaps the success of discord contributed to its demise.

What happens if proposed MCTSr algorithm is applied to GPT-4? It doesn't seem too hard to run that experiment.

I found a playlist of how to make these kind of animation, taught by the author.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=et-3Ho9RTR8&list=PLQFc-Dxlf4...

I've heard about membrane protein enables interaction with outside molecules that are random walking near the cell membrane, but seeing it as an animation really hit me that that's how things work.

Asking about itself returns this:

> "Citation Needed is an experimental feature developed in 2024"

- The provided passages do not contain any information about a feature called 'Citation Needed' being developed in 2024.

- Wikipedia

- Discouragement in education

- not be relied

I know I'm not using it for intended purposes but it seemed funny.

Why are there so many links to irrelevant wikipedia links, such as [wood], [woman], and [boon]? Did they just run a software to tag every noun with a wikipedia article?

I sense some connection to the concept of [the right level of abstraction](https://www.johndcook.com/blog/2018/09/04/the-right-level-of...)

I too would like to work with smart people. The answer.ai article about how great invention is made was very inspiring. This article tells me that I could have made some different life choices to achieve this, and ultimiately it is on my hand to behave differently.

It gravely saddens me that this inspiration will fade off after a few days of getting distracted by endless meetings.

The mentioned Xerox copier incident was not an OCR failure, but the copier actively changed the numbers in the original image due to its image compression algorithm.

> Mistaking side-effects of the system for the goals of the system.

Reminds me of the saying 'The purpose of a system is what it does'[1], which offers a viewpoint that if the side-effects and the goals conflict often, the side-effect itself should be considered as the goal.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_purpose_of_a_system_is_wha...