1,219 karma · joined November 4, 2010
This needs to be patched asap.
Can we agree that future titles should read "[LLM] helped solve X" ?
More and more it feels like a nation's kWh throughput is the new metric to track its global influence in manufacturing, industry, and financial services. In other words electric power now equates to global power.
By not crediting and personifying the LLM, one (re)takes full human responsibility over the produced works and stated claims. As a result one won’t become an “agent” for the LLM.
The title could have been Don’t blame the LLM.
When we first started using LLMs professionally it was fine to hide behind disclaimers. Now with widespread adoption it’s time to step out of the LLM’s shadow and take credit/blame again.
Let’s zoom in on your reply, the people who are interested and look at it and use it. What will they be able to do with it?
I know it’s a bold statement but look at this timing and their valuations going south.
OTOH garage-startup acquisitions are acquihires.
Any time a CEO publishes such empty, wordy essays, it's probably earnings reporting time. I can't shake the feeling it's a public subreply at one of or a cluster of doubting investors, who started to doubt the CEOs vision for the company, or find the lack of one on a certain topic concerning.