qpricjalcbeu

But then you're trying to time the market which goes against the passiveness approach that most people sign up to when they buy these sort of ETFs.

Idk, I kinda agree with Matt Levine. The purpose of these ETFs is conceptually to track the "largest X companies", so including SPCX is just staying true to that.

If there's an issue I think it's earlier in the IPO pipeline.

But how is that better than a single agent searching those "angles" sequentially?

Unless they are orthogonal they most likely require similar context anyway so multiple sub agent is just wasteful.

And in my experience the sub agent performance is usually worse than just a single agent.

Zuck was part of that team.

Yeah, no thanks. I cannot think of a worse company to trust with additional personal data.

Weren't they caught multiple times gaming the benchmark even more so then the rest?

So convert those buildings to giant dorms. Lots of younger people would be more than happy with such an option (as long as it's priced accordingly of course)

Can also combine with capsule hotels.

They aren't cynical, just disingenuous.

Google was providing cloud computing to the DoD before 2017 - there's no real morale difference between providing lower level compute vs providing a higher level AI algo other than giving yourself an excuse by adding one layer of abstraction (obfuscating?).

Very convenient to suddenly decide it's enough after collecting a massive paycheck for 10 years.