Even down to injecting an ad into the response as a joke.
83 karma · joined February 12, 2019
Even down to injecting an ad into the response as a joke.
So to log into my bank I have to load the website on my device, enter my username / password, have it send the SMS 2FA, switch to my home SIM card, wait to receive the text message, switch back to my EU SIM card, ensure internet works, then submit the 2FA code to finally log in.
That assumes I haven't forgotten something to poke the SIM card out with. I couldn't find eSIM last time I went to Portugal.
Their "unsubscribe" link at the bottom of the emails also doesn't work which is unacceptable.
It looks like the funds were drained within an hour of you loading the bounty. People have made giant lookup tables of brainwallet passwords and monitor the corresponding addresses for transactions. Reddit user u/btcrobinhood is known for doing this and returning the funds.
Please check for me, because I'm in a similar situation but have been hesitant to try logging back in.
"you [the licensee] may remove that term."
The licensee, meaning me, or the defendants in this case, can remove any terms which impose further restrictions. The licensor (Neo4j) has given written consent to do so.
All screensaver software that I've seen supports displaying an image / slide show which I will simply set to a black image. Another common feature is just displaying black.
Note: in Windows both of these are quite easy.
It also turns my display off, which is not what I want: https://i.imgur.com/z5BIqGj.png
Seems like it's not as simple as @nxbp claims.
Note, I'm using Debian Sid. Gnome 3.36.2 on Wayland.
Just recently I tried and failed to simply set up a screensaver that turns my screen black (not off!) to save my display from burn-in. Eventually I just gave up. You can't do this with stock GNOME. I also tried xscreensaver (but the Debian-specific instructions in the man page are out of date) and xfce4-screensaver, both didn't work.
I've been using Debian GNU/Linux since Feb 2016 and consider myself adept but still couldn't figure this very simple task out.
Is the hypothetical problem so bad that solving it is worth the ambiguity between octal numbers and the extra effort for readers to parse 02022 as year?
When you get past a certain number of notes, this becomes an issue. You might be trying to search for a concept you have a dedicated note of, but your search results are drowned out by normal usage of the word in other notes' contents.
The list of possible answers can be very long. When they don't recognize your device, you select the answer from a subset.
> The alternative is upload everything unencrypted to providers who then scan there
No, the alternative is to not do any scanning.
> If there is a data error and the CRC check fails, however, the receiver will not reply with an ACK, and the transmitter is required to resend the data with the same toggle bit. The transmitter will continue to resend the same data with the same toggle bit until the receiver ACKs its reception.
If you bought all the tickets, do you think you'd have over 100% chance of winning?
Edit: looks like leephillips beat me to it
USB employs two error checking methods to ensure that data is sent correctly:
https://web.archive.org/web/20130615145009/http://www.totalp...