qiuwu

In fact, LLM still in a copilot stage, which u should give idea and watch the result, verify whether it fit for your idea, and the truth.

Coz, LLM models tends to accept whatever you are right or not. So, during the time, always providing end-to-end verify for your target result is key.

AI Power is key foundation as Huang said. How many flops per W is another key cost for TCO of AI.

Exp. in LLM, pretrain and serving cost running on the AI power foundation, the ratio between USA-China is about ~0.053 VS ~0.13 USD/kWh. US cost is ~20%-2.4x larger than China.

So, in this game at the basic AI power layer, US way lagged behind. Mark Zuckerberg's Meta so far is lowest ROI in the race of LLM foundation, so why he dis approves is reasonable. Meta is touching the Bottom boundary of ROI in LLM.

Ref: https://energyandclimateindex.com/en/u-s-electricity-prices-...

Anti-China: K3 is propaganda and benchmaxxed, no matter how anthropic and openai reactor for these, it just a smoke signal.

Pro-China: K3 is good choice for better and affordable choice to smash down the Big three ruling.

It seems benchmark still far lagging beyond real abilities of LLM.

Does that count? Arena is real people, but only common parts, or might be a standard of another scope, i.e. personal interest or tast.

If comes to scientific side, the measure is really easy strap into a bias.

And the ground truth benchmark of LLM is still lacking.

HumanEval done, SWEBench done... Since it will lasting on and on, but task completion of LLM remain hard to be achieved esp. for high complexity task?

Just investor and Big Three of LLM fool of ppl?

OK, huge title with little detail.

Can't believe until i saw a comment 'Less dependence on China', then i got it.

Believe in what you want to believe, not depends on truth.

Good points. Another step to be a middleware translator between LLM abilities to specific application area.

It might lead to good or miss leading.

While LLM ability boundry extends, it might invalid for next turn.

Best Qiuwu