5,259 karma · joined April 22, 2019
This is a well established playbook - it was used with nuclear. It’s being used with oil transport.
It’s literally the same script.
It creates a system that diminishes risk, but simultaneously diminishes incentives for improvement.
I’ve been there: no job = food pantry + food stamps.
I live in a nice area. Since we are wealthy, our local economy has quite a bit of surplus. The food pantries regularly have organic and high end food. Plenty of people with money go there just because - why not?
The poorer parts of the county don’t have as much surplus, so they’re food pantries had old cheese and peanut butter.
I’m not sure what the solution is.
I remember food shortages during Covid. Nowhere near as bad as toilet paper shortages.
I can go without chocolate for a few days. Weeks, maybe. But if it becomes months, I get crabby.
Demand for food plummets when it is no longer fresh. Throwing food away is politically toxic. This creates major problems.
As people get richer they don’t want more food, they want better food. Fresher and more meat based. Which is fine. But means the food when you talk about food “that which prevents us from starving to death” you are quite divorced from actual demand.
People don’t price food based on its anti-starvation capabilities.
Either they follow traditional diets, or they buy for convenience (highly processed), or they are health nuts who live off rice, beans, and kale.
Nobody is trying to maximize calories. Very few people are trying to match their food intake to their amount physical exertion.
All these ontological and teleological models are divorced from how food is actually valued: market “taste” is insanely important under normal circumstances.
Our agriculture sector won’t succeed if it’s based around preventing famine.
The ironic thing is the money usually goes missing. It gets given to some VIPs brother, who is supposed to give it to VIP, but doesn’t.
The important thing is it not go missing while you are watching it. It can go missing later - just not on your watch.
Cars fixed that. And introduced other problems. But there are always trade offs.
Things have been getting better over time. Good enough for me.
The real source of “economic equality” is a ready supply of jobs for blue collar workers - oil, fishing, tourism, etc.
And the fact poor people leave, and don’t come in the first place.
I’ve heard similar things about Sweden: social welfare to avoid massive deaths by ice.
By the time Matrix came around, punk was out. Not a bad thing. Things come and go.
But sadly the cyber and punk parts got confused: Steampunk and Biopunk, which aren’t very punky.
I’m usually not a genre stickler, but I just got done reading anthology of early 80s cyberpunk punk. It was shocking. Really shocking. It was more about heavy metal and raves than technology.
Then add a telescope or sextant.
This is lots of fun, if you’re into that sort of thing.
But taking it away was worse.
Once “not using it” isn’t an option, government intervention becomes reasonable.